Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(02): 149-159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725105
Original Article

The Selection of Facelift Approach on the Basis of Midfacial Ptosis

Vito C. Quatela 
1   PLLC—Otolaryngology Division, Rochester, New York
,
Nigar N. Ahmedli
1   PLLC—Otolaryngology Division, Rochester, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Facial aging in the midface has been described to encompass both soft tissue descent and volumetric change. Currently, there is no established and widely accepted grading system for midfacial ptosis. We propose a simplified grading system for midfacial ptosis ranging from mild to severe in terms of Grades I through III. Using this classification system, we describe an algorithm to help select the facelift approach most appropriate for each patient. The sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system rhytidectomy, deep plane rhytidectomy, and subperiosteal midface lift techniques are described in detail. The nuances of the selection process also include a discussion on the various approaches to the orbital fat, namely a transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty with skin pinch versus a lower lid blepharoplasty with fat transposition, as well as the aging neck. Furthermore, we integrate the addition of postoperative adjunctive procedures which include injectables, chemical peels, and dermabrasion to address facial rejuvenation from not only a gravitational aspect but also the volumetric and textural components.

Keywords

midface - facelift - ptosis


Publication History

Article published online:
03 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Wan D, Amirlak B, Rohrich R, Davis K. The clinical importance of the fat compartments in midfacial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 1 (09) e92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wulc AE, Sharma P, Czyz CN. The anatomic basis of midfacial aging. In: Hartstein ME, Wulc AE, Holck DEE. eds. Midfacial Rejuvenation. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media; 2012: 15-28
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 441-449 , discussion 450–451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gosain AK, Amarante MT, Hyde JS, Yousif NJ. A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implications for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (04) 622-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1367-1376 , discussion 1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Donofrio LM. Fat distribution: a morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26 (12) 1107-1112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE, Ristow B. The youthful cheek and the deep medial fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 2107-2112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1804-1809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rohrich RJ, Arbique GM, Wong C, Brown S, Pessa JE. The anatomy of suborbicularis fat: implications for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 946-951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (04) 753-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mendelson BC, Hartley W, Scott M, McNab A, Granzow JW. Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31 (05) 419-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shaw Jr RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF. et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 374-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: verification of Lambros's theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (02) 479-488 , discussion 489–490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Farkas JP, Pessa JE, Hubbard B, Rohrich RJ. The science and theory behind facial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (01) e8-e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Quatela VC, Antunes MB. Transtemporal midface lifting to blend the lower eyelid-cheek junction. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42 (01) 103-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Catherine Weng MD, Vito Quatela MD. Achieving a youthful midface: examination of midface anatomy improvement following lower blepharoplasty with fat transposition and transtemporal midface lift with lower lid skin pinch. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (10) N416-N428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hamra ST. Arcus marginalis release and orbital fat preservation in midface rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (02) 354-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hoenig JF, Knutti D, de la Fuente A. Vertical subperiosteal mid-face-lift for treatment of malar festoons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 522-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Graham HD, Quatela VC, Sabini P. Endoscopic approach to the brow and midface. In: Papel ID. ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: Thieme; 2008: 227-242
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Darcy SJ, Miller TA, Goldberg RA, Villablanca JP, Demer JL, Rudkin GH. Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of orbital changes with age and associated contributions to lower eyelid prominence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (03) 921-929 , discussion 930–931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Smith SR, Jones D, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Beddingfield III FC. Duration of wrinkle correction following repeat treatment with Juvéderm hyaluronic acid fillers. Arch Dermatol Res 2010; 302 (10) 757-762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jeong GJ, Han HS, Ahn GR. et al. Validation of the midface volume deficit scale using a new photo-guideline in the Asian population. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019; 32 (04) e12938
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hollander E. Plastische (kosmetische) Operation: Kritische Darstellung ihres gegenwärtigen Standes. In: Klemperer G, Klemperer F. (eds), vol. 9. Berlin: Neue Deutsche Klinik, Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1932: 1-17
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Skoog T. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hamra ST. A study of the long-term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: short-term success but long-term failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 940-951 , discussion 952–959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jacono AA, Stong BC. Anatomic comparison of the deep-plane face-lift and the transtemporal midface-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (05) 339-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Litner JA, Adamson PA. Limited vs extended face-lift techniques: objective analysis of intraoperative results. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 186-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Quatela V, Montague A, Manning JP, Antunes M. Extended superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2020; 28 (03) 303-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Marotta JC, Quatela VC. Lower eyelid aesthetics after endoscopic forehead midface-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (04) 267-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Couch SM, Buchanan AG, Holds JB. Orbicularis muscle position during lower blepharoplasty with fat repositioning. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (06) 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Alghoul M, Bitik O, McBride J, Zins JE. Relationship of the zygomatic facial nerve to the retaining ligaments of the face: the Sub-SMAS danger zone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 245e-252e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela VC. Anatomical guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (02) 150-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Quatela VC, Jacono AA. The extended centrolateral endoscopic midface lift. Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19 (02) 199-208
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Quatela VC, Azzi JP, Antunes MB. Endoscopic-assisted facelifting. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 413-421
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Shah AR, Rosenberg D. Defining the facial extent of the platysma muscle: a review of 71 consecutive face-lifts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (06) 405-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Goodman GJ, Bekhor P, Rich M, Rosen RH, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2011; 4: 197-205
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Hsu AK, Frankel AS. Modification of chin projection and aesthetics with onabotulinumtoxin A injection. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (06) 522-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Yamauchi PS. Selection and preference for botulinum toxins in the management of photoaging and facial lines: patient and physician considerations. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010; 4: 345-354 . Published 2010 Sep 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rohrich RJ, Mohan R. Role of ancillary procedures in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (06) e2075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar