Proper Head Rotation when Performing Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: An Orthometric Consideration Based on Preoperative MRI

Abstract

Background The classic surgical position for microvascular decompression (MVD) is lateral decubitus with the head rotated 10 degrees away from the affected side. In this study, we measured the angles of the posterior fossa, specifically focusing on the surgical corridors used in MVD surgery for hemifacial spasm (HFS), to identify the proper surgical position.

Method The following parameters were assessed on preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI): petrous angle (PA), sigmoid angle (SA), sigmoid diameter (SD), and root exit zone–sigmoid sinus edge angle (REZ-SEA).

Results The mean PA was 59.7 ± 5.6 degrees, SA was 16.8 ± 8.6 degrees, SD was 13.4 ± 3.5 mm, and the mean REZ-SEA was 59.6 ± 5.8 degrees. The difference between the maximum SA to avoid cerebellar hemisphere injury and the minimum REZ-SEA required to verify the facial nerve REZ is assumed to be the usable range of angles for the operative microscope; the average midpoint of this range was 38.2 ± 6.4 degrees.

Conclusion Turning the patient's head 10 degrees away from the affected side was generally appropriate for performing MVD surgery because it provided a mean microscope angle of 48 degrees. However, some patients had corner values for the sigmoid angle, REZ-SEA, and sigmoid sinus diameter. Rotating a patient's head based on precise calculations from preoperative MRI helps to achieve successful surgery.

Keywords

hemifacial spasm - microvascular decompression - posterior fossa morphometry - surgical position

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. März 2020

Angenommen: 02. November 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2022

• References

• 1 Jannetta PJ, McLaughlin MR, Casey KF. Technique of microvascular decompression. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (05) E5
• 2 Hitotsumatsu T, Matsushima T, Inoue T. Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (06) 1436-1441 , discussion 1442–1443
• 3 McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK. Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (01) 1-8
• 4 Piazza M, Lee JY. Endoscopic and Microscopic Microvascular Decompression. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016; 27 (03) 305-313
• 5 Shimizu K, Matsumoto M, Wada A. et al. Supine No-Retractor Method in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Results of 100 Consecutive Operations. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (03) 202-207
• 6 Shimizu K, Matsumoto M, Wada A, Mizutani T. Lateral basal approach with a supine, no-retractor method for microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (05) 803-806
• 7 Cohen-Gadol AA. Microvascular decompression surgery for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm: naunces of the technique based on experiences with 100 patients and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113 (10) 844-853
• 8 Gardner WJ, Sava GA. Hemifacial spasm—a reversible pathophysiologic state. J Neurosurg 1962; 19 (03) 240-247
• 9 Smith DG, Mumford JM. Petrous angle and trigeminal neuralgia. Pain 1980; 8 (03) 269-277
• 10 Kamiguchi H, Ohira T, Ochiai M, Kawase T. Computed tomographic analysis of hemifacial spasm: narrowing of the posterior fossa as a possible facilitating factor for neurovascular compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62 (05) 532-534
• 11 Jeffery N. Brain expansion and comparative prenatal ontogeny of the non-hominoid primate cranial base. J Hum Evol 2003; 45 (04) 263-284