RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726501
Findings from the 2021 Yearbook Section on Health Information Management

Summary
Objectives: To summarize the recent literature and research and present a selection of the best papers published in 2020 in the field of Health Information Management (HIM) and Health Informatics.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature for the IMIA Yearbook HIM section was performed by the two section editors with the help of a medical librarian. We searched bibliographic databases for HIM-related papers using both MeSH headings and keywords in titles and abstracts. A shortlist of the fifteen best candidate papers was first selected by section editors before being peer-reviewed by independent external reviewers.
Results: The three major themes of Health Information Exchange (transmitting, sharing, and accessing patient health-related data and information) (HIE), Data Quality, and Privacy and Security make up 80% of the fifteen papers, with individual papers on personal health records, information governance and the professionalism of the HIM field.
Conclusions: Traditional HIM concerns about HIM practice and workforce as well as issues about the data in electronic health records (EHRs) including data quality, coding, health information exchange among entities within the healthcare systems and privacy and confidentiality continue to be a large part of the HIM research literature. Although there was little research applying these themes to pandemic concerns, HIM professionals have the expertise to make ccontributions to public health informatics research and this research would benefit from their involvement.
Keywords
Health information management - health information exchange - data quality - privacy and security - electronic health records - public health informaticsPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. September 2021
© 2021. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Massoudi BL, Sobolevskaiya D. Keep moving forward: health informatics and information management beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Yearb Med Inform 2021; 75-83
- 2 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Promoting Interoperability Programs [Internet]. 2021 . Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms
- 3 Powell KR, Deroche CB, Alexander GL. Health Data Sharing in US Nursing Homes: A Mixed Methods Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22 (05) 1052-9
- 4 Turvey CL, Klein DM, Nazi KM, Haidary ST, Bouhaddou O, Hsing N. et al. Racial differences in patient consent policy preferences for electronic health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (05) 717-25
- 5 Apathy NC, Holmgren AJ. Opt-in consent policies: potential barriers to hospital health information exchange. Am J Manag Care 2020; 26 (01) e14-e20
- 6 Everson J, Butler E. Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (04) 577-83
- 7 Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T, Dharanikota S. The impact of data entry structures on perceptions of individuals with chronic mental disorders and physical diseases towards health information sharing. Int J Med Inform 2020; 141: 104157
- 8 Mirhashemi SH, Ramezanghorbani N, Asadi F, Rangraz MH. Auditing the accuracy of medical diagnostic coding based on international classification of diseases, tenth revision. Iranian Red Crescent Med J 2020;22(9).
- 9 Cappetta K, Lago L, Potter J, Phillipson L. Under-coding of dementia and other conditions indicates scope for improved patient management: A longitudinal retrospective study of dementia patients in Australia. Health Inf Manag 2020; 1833358319897928
- 10 Sheriffdeen A, Millar JL, Martin C, Evans M, Tikellis G, Evans SM. (Dis)concordance of comorbidity data and cancer status across administrative datasets, medical charts, and self-reports. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20 (01) 858
- 11 Nshimyiryo A, Kirk CM, Sauer SM, Ntawuyirusha E, Muhire A, Sayinzoga F. et al. Health management information system (HMIS) data verification: A case study in four districts in Rwanda. PLoS One 2020; 15 (07) e0235823
- 12 Aldughayfiq B, Sampalli S. Digital Health in Physicians’ and Pharmacists’ Office: A Comparative Study of e-Prescription Systems’ Architecture and Digital Security in Eight Countries. OMICS 2021; 25 (02) 102-22
- 13 Zhou L, Parmanto B. User Preferences for Privacy Protection Methods in Mobile Health Apps: A Mixed-Methods Study. Int J Telerehabil 2020; 12 (02) 13-26
- 14 Walden A, Cortelyou-Ward K, Gabriel MH, Noblin A. To report or not to report health care data breaches. Am J Manag Care 2020; 26 (12) e395-e402
- 15 Alsahafi YA, Gay V, Khwaji AA. Factors affecting the acceptance of integrated electronic personal health records in Saudi Arabia: The impact of e-health literacy. Health Inf Manag 2020; 1833358320964899
- 16 Kwan H, Riley M, Prasad N, Robinson K. An investigation of the status and maturity of hospitals’ health information governance in Victoria, Australia. Health Inf Manag 2020; 1833358320938309
- 17 Thye J, Esdar M, Liebe JD, Jahn F, Winter A, Hübner U. Professionalism of Information Management in Health Care: Development and Validation of the Construct and Its Measurement. Methods Inf Med 2020; 59 (S01): e1-e12