RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727228
Disparities in Trial of Labor among Women with Twin Gestations in the United States
Funding L.M.Y. was supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development with NICHD K12 HD050121-11 at the time when the study was conducted.Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to examine clinical and demographic factors associated with trial of labor (TOL) among women with twin gestations eligible for a vaginal delivery.
Study Design This was a population-based cohort study of women giving birth to twin gestations in the United States (2012–2014). Inclusion criteria for the analysis included live births greater than 23 weeks' gestation and a cephalic presenting twin. Women with prior cesarean delivery were excluded. Women were categorized by whether they underwent a TOL. Clinical and demographic characteristics associated with TOL status were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Secondary analyses with stratification by parity and by second twin presentation were performed.
Results Of 90,000 women eligible for inclusion, a minority (39.3%) underwent TOL. Women who had a greater gestational age at delivery were more likely to have a TOL. In contrast, several demographic factors were associated with decreased likelihood of TOL, including maternal age >35 years and identifying as Hispanic or Asian compared with non-Hispanic White. No differences in odds of TOL were observed for women who were identified as non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White, nor were other demographic factors such as marital status, insurance status, or educational attainment associated with undergoing TOL. Clinical factors associated with decreased odds of TOL included nulliparity, obesity, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Results did not substantively change when stratified by parity or second twin presentation, nor did findings differ in the subgroup who delivered at 32 weeks of gestation or greater.
Conclusion In this large population of women with twins who were eligible for a TOL, a minority of individuals attempted a vaginal delivery. Demographic and clinical factors such as older maternal age, Asian or Hispanic racial or ethnic identification, nulliparity, and obesity are associated with decreased odds of undergoing TOL.
Key Points
-
Understanding disparities in trial of labor among patients with twins is key to promoting equity.
-
Older maternal age and identifying as Hispanic or Asian were associated with lower odds of TOL.
-
Nulliparity, obesity, and hypertension were associated with decreased odds of TOL.
Note
This abstract was presented as a poster presentation at the 2017 Society for Reproductive Investigation 65th Annual Scientific Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 15-18, 2017.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 11. August 2020
Angenommen: 02. März 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. April 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Bibbo C, Robinson JN. Management of twins: vaginal or cesarean delivery?. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58 (02) 294-308
- 2 Barrett JFR, Hannah ME, Hutton EK. et al; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (14) 1295-1305
- 3 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (04) e131-e146
- 4 Hofmeyr GJ, Barrett JF, Crowther CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12) CD006553
- 5 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2018
- 6 Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, El-Sayed YY, Blumenfeld YJ. Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (05) 1095-1101
- 7 Bateni ZH, Clark SL, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. et al. Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006-2013. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 205: 120-126
- 8 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
- 9 Drassinower D, Timofeev J, Huang CC, Landy HJ. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (02) 160.e1-160.e7
- 10 Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The Black-White disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 2007; 97 (02) 247-251
- 11 Caughey AB. Reducing primary cesarean delivery: can we prevent current and future morbidity and mortality?. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (11) 717-718
- 12 User Guide to the 2013 Natality Public Use File. 2014 . Accessed October 26, 2016 at: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/userGuide2013.pdf
- 13 User Guide to the 2014 Natality Public Use File. 2015 . Accessed October 26, 2016 at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/natality/NatalityPublicUseUserGuide2014.pdf
- 14 Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death (2003 revision). 2006 . Accessed September 12, 2016 at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/guidetocompletefacilitywks.pdf
- 15 Calculate your body mass index. Accessed August 19, 2016 at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmicalc
- 16 Gunatilake RP, Perlow JH. Obesity and pregnancy: clinical management of the obese gravida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (02) 106-119
- 17 Easter SR, Taouk L, Schulkin J, Robinson JN. Twin vaginal delivery: innovate or abdicate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (05) 484-488.e4
- 18 Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, Barrett JF, Hannah ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (01) 220-227
- 19 Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27 (02) 153-164
- 20 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; (191) 1-397