RSS-Feed abonnieren
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727293
Contusion Index is an Important Tool for the Management of Traumatic Intracerebral Hematoma
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00029202/202201/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0041-1727293-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective This article evaluates outcome of traumatic intracerebral hematomas in terms of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) after medical or surgical management according to contusion index.
Materials and Methods This descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan from January 2017 to December 2018. Total number of patients with traumatic intracerebral contusions included in this study was 60 with age between 5 and 75 years. Both male and female were included. Patients with other coexisting traumatic intracranial hematomas like extradural hematoma, subdural hematoma, and polytrauma were excluded from this study. Contusion index of patients were calculated by noncontrast-enhanced computed tomography brain. On arrival patient GCS was documented. The management protocol, that is, conservative or surgical, was provided to individual patient according to contusion index as calculated. Outcome of management was assessed in terms of GCS.
Results Patients with contusion index of 0 to 4 were managed conservatively. Patients with contusion index of 6 were offered surgical management. Patients with contusion index of 9 had poor outcome with both conservative and surgical management.
Conclusion Contusion index can be used reliably as a tool for management of isolated traumatic intracerebral hematomas
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Juli 2021
© 2021. Neurotrauma Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Adams JH, Scott G, Parker LS, Graham DI, Doyle D. The contusion index: a quantitative approach to cerebral contusions in head injury. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1980; 6 (04) 319-324
- 2 Han JS, Kaufman B, Alfidi RJ. et al Head trauma evaluated by magnetic resonance and computed tomography: a comparison. Radiology 1984; 150 (01) 71-77
- 3 Marshall LF, Klauber MR. The outcome of severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 28-36
- 4 Kraus JF. Epidemiology of head injury. In: Copper PR. Ed. Head Injury. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987: 1-19
- 5 Macpherson BC, MacPherson P, Jennett B. CT evidence of intracranial contusion and haematoma in relation to the presence, site and type of skull fracture. Clin Radiol 1990; 42 (05) 321-326
- 6 Adams JH. The neuropathology of head injuries. In: Vinkemn PJ, Bruyn GH. eds Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 23. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1975: 35-65
- 7 Gudeman SK, Kishore PR, Becker DP. et al Computed tomography in the evaluation of incidence and significance of post-traumatic hydrocephalus. Radiology 1981; 141 (02) 397-402
- 8 Boom WH, Tuazon CU. Successful treatment of multiple brain abscesses with antibiotics alone. Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7 (02) 189-199
- 9 Illingworth RD. Operative surgery. 8th ed Greensberg Handbook of Neurosurgery 270-272
- 10 Stein SC, Ross SE. Moderate head injury: a guide to initial management. J Neurosurg 1992; 77 (04) 562-564
- 11 Jennett B, Teasdale G, Galbraith S. et al Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977; 40 (03) 291-298
- 12 Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, Keihm J, Chabal S, Winn HR. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med 1990; 323 (08) 497-502
- 13 Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD. et al Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 1981; 54 (06) 751-762