RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728702
Brazilian authors don't cite Brazilian authors: Nothing has changed since 1994[*]
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Abstract
Objective To outline the profile of self-citations from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Rev Bras Ortop) and citations of this journal in other medical orthopaedic journals with general or specific content in a knowledge area of the specialty.
Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study of the frequency of self-citations and citations from Rev Bras Ortop in five other medical orthopaedic journals from different countries, all published in English. The last 15 articles published in 2020 in each of the six journals were analyzed. The references used in each of them were evaluated to identify the journal in which they were originally published. The frequency of distribution of the four main journals cited, their position, and the relative percentage to the total number of citations were observed and recorded in each of the six journals. The number of times that the Rev Bras Ortop was cited in each of the selected foreign journals was assessed using its absolute and relative frequencies.
Results The total number of citations evaluated in this study was 2,527 (ranging from 386 to 486 per magazine). Rev Bras Ortop showed a low rate of self-citation (2.6%), being the sixth journal cited in the journal itself (10 out of a total of 386 references). Moreover, Rev Bras Ortop was not mentioned in any of the other five medical journals included in the study (absolute frequency 0, relative frequency 0).
Conclusion Rev Bras Ortop has a low reference of itself, with a self-citation rate of 2.6% in the studied period, showing that the Brazilian orthopaedic surgeons do not mention the Brazilian orthopaedic surgeon who publishes in the journal. We suggest the elaboration and implementation of strong strategies to improve the journal's visibility in the world academic-scientific scenario. In addition, it is essential that Brazilian orthopaedic surgeons understand this reality and assist directly and effectively to change this scenario.
* Work developed by the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Prof. Nova Monteiro, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ and Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 07. Februar 2021
Angenommen: 19. Februar 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. April 2021
© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Asnake M. The importance of scientific publication in the development of public health. Cien Saude Colet 2015; 20 (07) 1972-1973
- 2 Morley P, Urquhart C. Publishing trends in medical journal literature: the views of medical staff in an NHS teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Health Info Libr J 2004; 21 (02) 121-124
- 3 Hudzik B. What makes a good medical journal great?. CMAJ 2016; 188 (07) 531
- 4 Garba S, Ahmed A, Mai A, Makama G, Odigie V. Proliferations of scientific medical journals: a burden or a blessing. Oman Med J 2010; 25 (04) 311-314
- 5 Suiter AM, Sarli CC. Selecting a journal for publication: criteria to consider. Mo Med 2019; 116 (06) 461-465
- 6 Not-so-deep impact. Nature 2005; 435 (7045): 1003-1004
- 7 Sundaram K, Warren J, Anis HK, Klika AK, Piuzzi NS. Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30 (04) 629-635
- 8 Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295 (01) 90-93
- 9 Björk BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012; 10: 73
- 10 Suzuki K, Edelson A, Iversen LL, Hausmann L, Schulz JB, Turner AJ. A learned society's perspective on publishing. J Neurochem 2016; 139 (Suppl. 02) 17-23
- 11 Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. [Last accessed in January 2021] from https://www.scielo.br/revistas/rbort/iaboutj.htm
- 12 Lech O. Os autores brasileiros não citam os autores brasileiros. [Editorial]Rev Bras Ortop 1994;29(09)
- 13 Lech O. Autores nacionais não citam os autores nacionais–parte 2. Comunicação Pessoal; 2020
- 14 The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. [Last accessed in January 2021] from https://www.ovid.com/product-details.11933.html
- 15 The Bone & Joint Journal. [Last accessed in January 2021] from: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/journal/bjj
- 16 Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Túrcica. [Last accessed in January 2021] from https://www.aott.org.tr/
- 17 Der Unfallchirurg. [Last accessed in January 2021] from https://www.springer.com/journal/113
- 18 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Last accessed in January 2021 from https://www.jshoulderelbow.org/
- 19 Marusić M. Why physicians should publish, how easy it is, and how important it is in clinical work. Arch Oncol 2003; 11 (02) 59-64
- 20 Balhara YP. Indexed journal: What does it mean?. Lung India 2012; 29 (02) 193
- 21 Seglen PO. Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (03) 224-229
- 22 Kurmis AP. Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (12) 2449-2454
- 23 Whitehouse GH. Impact factors: facts and myths. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (04) 715-717
- 24 Chloros GD, Giannoudis VP, Giannoudis PV. Peer-reviewing in surgical journals: revolutionize or perish?. Ann Surg 2021
- 25 Rupp M, Anastasopoulou L, Wintermeyer E, Malhaan D, El Khassawna T, Heiss C. Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (03) 509-517
- 26 Smith R. The trouble with medical journals. J R Soc Med 2006; 99 (03) 115-119
- 27 Wilkinson J. How to find the right journal for your research (using actual data). [Last accessed in January 2021] from: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/article/how-to-find-the-right-journal-for-your-research-using-actual-data/
- 28 Chomsky-Higgins K, Miclau TA, Mackechnie MC. et al. Barriers to clinical research in Latin America. Front Public Health 2017; 5: 57
- 29 Urrutia J, Zamora T, Prada C. The fifty most cited Latin-American articles in the orthopaedic literature. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (08) 1723-1729
- 30 Metze K. Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor: a vicious circle that is detrimental to science. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010; 65 (10) 937-940
- 31 Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (06) 2234-2242