PDF herunterladen
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(06): 332-338
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728755
Research Article

Motivational Interviewing for Hearing Aid Use: A Systematic Meta-Analysis on Its Potential for Adult Patients with Hearing Loss

Alice Q. Liu 
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
Bella Wu
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
Desmond A. Nunez 
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Erratum zu diesem Artikel:

Erratum to: Motivational Interviewing for Hearing Aid Use: A Systematic Meta-Analysis on Its Potential for Adult Patients with Hearing LossJ Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(06): e1-e1
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764384

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study is to conduct a meta-analysis examining the impact of motivational interviewing (MI) on hearing aid (HA) use compared with standard care.

Research Design The research design is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane ENT, Central, Medline, Web of Science, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1988 and 2018 that compared MI to standard care.

Study Sample The study sample consists of four RCTs, investigating a total of 176 patients.

Data Collection and Analysis RevMan 5.3 and a random effect model were used for analysis.

Results The standardized mean difference in data-logged hours of HA use was not statistically significant (0.34 [95% confidence interval or CI: −0.10, 0.78; p = 0.13]). The mean difference for user-reported outcomes on the International Outcome Inventory—Hearing Aids of 0.41 [CI: −1.00, 1.82; p = 0.57] was also not significant.

Conclusion There is no current evidence that MI significantly improves HA use or user-reported outcomes. However, there were limited studies included in this review and further research is indicated.

Keywords

motivational interviewing - hearing aid - amplification

Note

This work was presented at the American Academy of Audiology 2020þHearTECH expo (eConference due to COVID-19).


Disclaimer

Any mention of a product, service, or procedure in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology does not constitute an endorsement of the product, service, or procedure by the American Academy of Audiology.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 05. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Juni 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Vos T, Allen C, Arora M. et al; GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388 (10053): 1545-1602
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gopinath B, Wang JJ, Schneider J. et al. Depressive symptoms in older adults with hearing impairments: the Blue Mountains Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57 (07) 1306-1308
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hickson L, Scarinci N. Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28 (04) 283-290
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Li-Korotky HS. Age-related hearing loss: quality of care for quality of life. Gerontologist 2012; 52 (02) 265-271
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005; 366 (9491): 1111-1120
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Aazh H, Prasher D, Nanchahal K, Moore BC. Hearing-aid use and its determinants in the UK National Health Service: a cross-sectional study at the Royal Surrey County Hospital. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (03) 152-161
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jenstad L, Moon J. Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to hearing aid uptake in older adults. Audiology Res 2011; 1 (01) e25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Nunez DA, Mousavi SM. What determines the older adults use of a hearing aid?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; (Suppl. 01) 128 . Available at: https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/doi/full/10.1177/0194599816655336f
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Acar B, Yurekli MF, Babademez MA, Karabulut H, Karasen RM. Effects of hearing aids on cognitive functions and depressive signs in elderly people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011; 52 (03) 250-252
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Johnson CE, Jilla AM, Danhauer JL. Developing foundational counseling skills for addressing adherence issues in Auditory Rehabilitation. Semin Hear 2018; 39 (01) 13-31
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Manchaiah V, Hernandez BM, Beck DL. Application of transtheoretical (stages of change) model in studying attitudes and behaviors of adults with hearing loss: a descriptive review. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29 (06) 548-560
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ekberg K, Grenness C, Hickson L. Application of the transtheoretical model of behaviour change for identifying older clients' readiness for hearing rehabilitation during history-taking in audiology appointments. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (Suppl. 03) S42-S51
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pryce H, Hall A, Laplante-Lévesque A, Clark E. A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (11) 658-665
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Sciacca A, Meyer C, Ekberg K, Barr C, Hickson L. Exploring audiologists' language and hearing aid uptake in initial rehabilitation appointments. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (02) 110-118
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Knudsen LV, Öberg M, Nielsen C, Naylor G, Kramer SE. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif 2010; 14 (03) 127-154
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Miller WR. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Cogn Psychother 1983; 11 (02) 147-172
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55 (513) 305-312
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Solheim J, Gay C, Lerdal A, Hickson L, Kvaerner KJ. An evaluation of motivational interviewing for increasing hearing aid use: a pilot study. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29 (08) 696-705
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behav Cogn Psychother 2009; 37 (02) 129-140
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Markland D, Ryan RM, Tobin VJ, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing and self–determination theory. J Soc Clin Psychol 2005; 24 (06) 811-831
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2019
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Aazh H. Feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing on hearing-aid use. Int J Audiol 2016; a 55 (03) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ferguson M, Maidment D, Russell N, Gregory M, Nicholson R. Motivational engagement in first-time hearing aid users: a feasibility study. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (Suppl. 03) S23-S33
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Zarenoe R, Söderlund LL, Andersson G, Ledin T. Motivational interviewing as an adjunct to hearing rehabilitation for patients with tinnitus: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (08) 669-676
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Lewis S. Applying the use of motivational tools to auditory rehabilitation (NCT 01843777). 2016 . Published October 7, 2016. Accessed January 21, 2020 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01843777
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Perez E, Edmonds BA. A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools. PLoS One 2012; 7 (03) e31831
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S. et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000; 21 (Suppl. 04) 106S-115S
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Hickson LM, Timm MJ, Worrall LE, Bishop K. Hearing aid fitting: outcome for older adults. Aust J Audiol 1999; 21 (01) 9-21
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Wilson C, Stephens D. Reasons for referral and attitudes toward hearing aids: do they affect outcome?. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003; 28 (02) 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ismail AH, Munro KJ, Armitage CJ, Dawes PD. What do hearing healthcare professionals do to promote hearing aid use and benefit among adults? A systematic review. Int J Audiol 2019; 58 (02) 63-76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Aazh H. Patients' experience of motivational interviewing for hearing aid use: a qualitative study embedded within a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Phonet Audiol 2016; b 2 (01) 1-13
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Mahood Q, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res Synth Methods 2014; 5 (03) 221-234
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Tetzlaff J, Moher D, Pham B, Altman D. Survey of views on including grey literature in systematic reviews. Paper presented at: 16th Cochrane Colloquium, Dublin, Ireland; 2006
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar