The Association between the Number of Vacuum Pop-Offs and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Abstract

Objective Obstetrical vacuum manufacturers have long recommended a maximum of two to three pop-offs be allowed before abandoning the procedure. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the safety of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery in relation to the number of pop-offs to support this recommendation. Our objective was to examine whether the number of pop-offs in a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent a trial of a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery at a single tertiary care institution between October 2005 and June 2014. Maternal and fetal factors associated with the number of pop-offs were examined in bivariable analyses. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the independent association of the number of pop-offs with adverse neonatal outcomes.

Results Of the 1,730 women who met inclusion criteria, 1,293 (74.7%) had no pop-offs, 240 (13.9%) had one pop-off, 128 (7.4%) had two pop-offs, and 69 (4.0%) had three or more pop-offs. Neonatal scalp/facial lacerations, intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, central nervous system depression, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were all associated with the number of pop-offs in bivariable analyses. In multivariable analyses, compared to no pop-offs, having any vacuum pop-offs was associated with an increased odds of adverse neonatal outcomes. However, there was not a consistent dose–response relationship.

Conclusion While having vacuum pop-offs in a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes, there did not appear to be a dose-dependent association with the number of pop-offs.

Key Points

• There are no specific guidelines on how many pop-offs can be allowed before abandoning a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

• Having any vacuum pop-offs was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

• There was no dose-dependent association between number of pop-offs and adverse neonatal outcomes.

Keywords

vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery - vacuum - pop-off - dislodgment - detachment - obstetrician

Note

This study was presented orally at the 38th annual meeting of the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Dallas, TX, January 29–February 3, 2018.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. Oktober 2020

Angenommen: 02. März 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Ali UA, Norwitz ER. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2 (01) 5-17
• 2 National Vital Statistics Reports Vol 66, No.1. Births: final data for 2015. . Accessed April 7, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_01.pdf
• 3 Kiwi Complete Vacuum Delivery System with PalmPump Instructions for use. Accessed September 15, 2020 at: http://clinicalinnovations.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Kiwi-IFU.pdf
• 4 McQuivey RW. Vacuum-assisted delivery: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 16 (03) 171-180
• 5 Johanson R, Menon V. Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2 (02) CD000446
• 6 Teng FY, Sayre JW. Vacuum extraction: does duration predict scalp injury?. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (02) 281-285
• 7 Ghidini A, Stewart D, Pezzullo JC, Locatelli A. Neonatal complications in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: are they associated with number of pulls, cup detachments, and duration of vacuum application?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295 (01) 67-73
• 8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 219: Operative vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135: e149-e159
• 9 Mityvac M-Style Mushroom Cup Directions for Use. . Accessed September 15, 2020 at: https://www.coopersurgical.com/Products/Detail/mityvac-vacuum-assisted-delivery-system
• 10 Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N. et al. Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (03) 626-633
• 11 Krispin E, Aviram A, Salman L, Chen R, Wiznitzer A, Gabbay-Benziv R. Cup detachment during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and birth outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296 (05) 877-883
• 12 Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 2003; 110 (06) 610-615
• 13 Miller ES, Lai Y, Bailit J. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network*. Duration of operative vaginal delivery and adverse obstetric outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (05) 503-510
• 14 Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (04) 896-902
• 15 Vacca A. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46 (02) 124-127
• 16 Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Brockelsby JC, Scott JG. Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (04) 796-803
• 17 Bofill JA, Rust OA, Devidas M, Roberts WE, Morrison JC, Martin Jr JN. Neonatal cephalohematoma from vacuum extraction. J Reprod Med 1997; 42 (09) 565-569
• 18 Castro MA, Hoey SD, Towner D. Controversies in the use of the vacuum extractor. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27 (01) 46-53