Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34(05): 321-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729624
Original Research

Comparison of Single versus Double Lateral Plating in Treatment of Feline Ilial Fractures Using Veterinary Cuttable Plates

Tijn Wiersema
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Ties Koolen
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Evidensia Dierenziekenhuis Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Lars F. H. Theyse
3   Department for Small Animals Soft Tissue and Orthopaedic Surgery Service, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Roelof J. Maarschalkweerd
4   Department of Orthopaedics, Medisch Centrum voor Dieren, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Cornelis D. van Zuilen
4   Department of Orthopaedics, Medisch Centrum voor Dieren, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Sarah J. van Rijn
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of implant failure and the extent of pelvic canal narrowing associated with the fixation of ilial fractures in cats with a single veterinary cuttable plate (SLP) or double veterinary cuttable plates (DLP) applied to the lateral surface of the ilium.

Study Design Radiographic evaluation of feline ilial fractures plated laterally using SLP or DLP. Pelvic canal narrowing directly postoperatively and at 6 weeks follow-up was objectively measured using the sacral index (SI). Radiographs were evaluated for implant failure and fracture healing.

Results Seventy-seven cats satisfied the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine fractures were treated with a SLP and 48 with DLP. Implant failure occurred significantly more (p = 0.001) in the SLP group (14/29) compared with the DLP group (6/48). Follow-up SI was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.048, SLP median: 1.0 range: 0.83–2.4, DLP median: 0.98; range: 0.76–1.45). Median change in SI was −0.04 (range: −1.4 to 0.05) in the SLP group and 0.0 (range: −0.23 to 0.23) in the DLP group. This difference was significantly different (p = 0.031).

Conclusion DLP leads to significantly less implant failure and significantly less pelvic canal narrowing compared with SLP. This difference in pelvic canal narrowing was small and the clinical relevance remains unclear.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. They drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript and are publically accountable for relevant content.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 05. Februar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Juni 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany