CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2021; 06(01): e35-e39
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729640
Original Article

Free Tissue Transfer in Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Chelsi Robertson
1   School of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana
,
Charles Patterson
2   Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; New Orleans, Louisiana
,
Hugo St. Hilaire
2   Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; New Orleans, Louisiana
,
Frank H. Lau
2   Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; New Orleans, Louisiana
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Pressure ulcers (PUs) affect 2.5 million people in the United States annually and incur health-care costs of 11 billion dollars annually. Stage III/IV PU often require local flap reconstruction. Unfortunately, PU recurrence is common following reconstruction; recurrence rates as high as 82% have been reported. When local flap options are inadequate, free tissue transfer may be indicated but the indications have yet to be delineated. To develop evidence-based guidelines for the use of free flaps in PU reconstruction, we performed a systematic review.

Methods A systematic review of the available English-language, peer-reviewed literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles were manually reviewed for relevance.

Results Out of 272 articles identified, 10 articles were included in the final analysis. Overall, this systematic review suggests that free-flap PU reconstruction yields fewer recurrences compared with local flaps (0–20 vs. 13–82%). Further, several types of free flaps for PU reconstruction were identified in this review, along with their indications.

Conclusion Free tissue transfer should be considered for recurrent PU. We offer specific recommendations for their use in PU reconstruction.

Financial Disclosure Statement

No funding was received for this article.




Publication History

Received: 19 October 2020

Accepted: 15 February 2021

Article published online:
28 June 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Chiu Y-J, Liao W-C, Wang T-H. et al. A retrospective study: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the outcomes after pressure sores reconstruction with fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, and perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (08) 1038-1043
  • 2 Bauer JD, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG. Pressure Sores. In: Thorne CHM, Beasley RW, Sherrell J, Bartlett Sp, Gurtner G. eds. Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006
  • 3 Mervis JS, Phillips TJ. Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81 (04) 881-890
  • 4 Bauer J, Phillips LG. MOC-PSSM CME article: Pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (1, suppl): 1-10
  • 5 Bass MJ, Phillips LG. Pressure sores. Current Problems in Surgery 2007; 42 (02) 101-143
  • 6 Keys KA, Daniali LN, Warner KJ, Mathes DW. Multivariate predictors of failure after flap coverage of pressure ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (06) 1725-1734
  • 7 Thiessen FE, Andrades P, Blondeel PN. et al. Flap surgery for pressure sores: should the underlying muscle be transferred or not?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (01) 84-90
  • 8 Disa JJMD, Carlton JMMD, Goldberg NHMD. Efficacy of operative cure in pressure sore patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (02) 272-278
  • 9 Tavakoli K, Rutkowski S, Cope C. et al. Recurrence rates of ischial sores in para- and tetraplegics treated with hamstring flaps: an 8-year study. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (06) 476-479
  • 10 Relander M, Palmer B. Recurrence of surgically treated pressure sores. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1988; 22 (01) 89-92
  • 11 Larson DL, Hudak KA, Waring WP, Orr MR, Simonelic K. Protocol management of late-stage pressure ulcers: a 5-year retrospective study of 101 consecutive patients with 179 ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (04) 897-904
  • 12 Evans GRD, Dufresne CR, Manson PN. Surgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center: is it efficacious?. Adv Wound Care 1994; 7 (01) 40-46
  • 13 Kierney PC, Cardenas DD, Engrav LH, Grant JH, Rand RP. Limb-salvage in reconstruction of recalcitrant pressure sores using the inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (01) 111-116
  • 14 Kierney PC, Engrav LH, Isik FF, Esselman PC, Cardenas DD, Rand RP. Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 765-772
  • 15 Schryvers OI, Stranc MF, Nance PW. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers: 20-year experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (12) 1556-1562
  • 16 He J, Xu H, Wang T, Ma S, Dong J. Treatment of complex ischial pressure sores with free partial lateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps in paraplegic patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (05) 634-639
  • 17 Küntscher MVMD, Erdmann D, Homann H-HMD, Steinau H-UMD, Levin SLMD, Germann G. The concept of fillet flaps: classification, indications, and analysis of their clinical value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 885-896
  • 18 Roulet S, Le Nail L-R, Vaz G. et al. Free fillet lower leg flap for coverage after hemipelvectomy or hip disarticulation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (01) 47-54
  • 19 Kwon R, Rendon JL, Janis JE. Pressure sores. In: Song DH, Neligan PC, Liu DZ. eds. Plastic Surgery: Lower Extremity, Trunk, and Burns. Vol. 4. 4th ed.. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2018: 350-380
  • 20 Kuo P-J, Chew K-Y, Kuo Y-R, Lin P-Y. Comparison of outcomes of pressure sore reconstructions among perforator flaps, perforator-based rotation fasciocutaneous flaps, and musculocutaneous flaps. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (07) 547-553
  • 21 Hallock GG. Closure of an ischial pressure sore using a free gastrocnemius musculocutaneous flap with a long venous pedicle. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48 (07) 504-506
  • 22 Park S, Koh KS. Superior gluteal vessel as recipient for free flap reconstruction of lumbosacral defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (07) 1842-1849
  • 23 Yoon S, Jeong E, Lázaro HA. Multidisciplinary approach to an extended pressure sore at the lumbosacral area. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43 (06) 586-589
  • 24 Chang L-R, Lee J-W. Free flap coverage of gluteal defect using posteriorly translocated deep femoral vessels as recipient. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (03) 157-159
  • 25 Hung SJ, Chen HC, Wei FC. Free flaps for reconstruction of the lower back and sacral area. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (02) 72-76
  • 26 Jones JW. Reinnervated medial gastrocnemius free flap for closure of a recurrent ischial pressure sore: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (05) 397-400
  • 27 Feliciano B, Paige KT, Beshlian KM. Latissimus dorsi free flaps for complex ischiosacral defects. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (05) 648-650
  • 28 de la Fuente TP, González I, Calderón-Muñoz F. The role of medial gastrocnemius free flap in coverage of ischial pressure sore in paraplegic patients. Int J Surg 2008; 6 (06) e72-e76
  • 29 Lemaire V, Boulanger K, Heymans O. Free flaps for pressure sore coverage. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (06) 631-634