PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(01): 064-074
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729882
Original Article

A Retrospective Comparative Functional and Aesthetic Outcome Study of Muscle versus Cutaneous Free Flaps for Distal Upper Extremity Reconstruction

Benjamin Thomas 
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Jan Warszawski
3   Department for Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Florian Falkner
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Sarah S. Nagel
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Felix Vollbach
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Emre Gazyakan 
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Volker J. Schmidt
4   Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
,
Ulrich Kneser
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Amir K. Bigdeli
1   Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Function and cosmesis are crucial in upper extremity reconstruction. Yet, there persists a lack of outcome evaluations, particularly regarding differences between free flap types.

Methods In a single-center retrospective analysis, outcomes were compared between patients with cutaneous or muscle free flaps for distal upper extremity reconstruction between 2008 and 2018. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand -Score, Michigan-Hand (MHQ), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaires were assessed, motor function was quantified, and self-reported measures of cosmesis were compared, including the Vancouver Scar-Scale (VSS), MHQ aesthetics-subscale (MAS), and Moscona's cosmetic validation-score (CVS).

Results One-hundred forty-one cases were identified, with a shift toward cutaneous flaps over the study period. Muscle flaps were used for larger defects (251 vs. 142 cm2, p = 0.008). Losses, thromboses, and donor-site complications were equally distributed. Partial necroses were more frequent in muscle flaps (11 vs. 1%, p = 0.015). Seventy patients with 53 cutaneous versus 17 muscle flaps were reexamined. There was no difference in the timing of flap coverage (after 16 vs. 15 days, p = 0.79), number of preceding (2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.95), or subsequent operations (19/53 vs. 5/17, p = 0.77). Patients with cutaneous flaps showed higher grip strength (25 vs. 17 kg, p = 0.046) and reported better hand function (MHQ: 58 vs. 47, p = 0.044) and general health (SF-36: 70 vs. 61, p = 0.040), as well as more favorable appearance (MAS: 71 vs. 57, p = 0.044, CVS: 77 vs. 72, p = 0.048), and scar burden (VSS: 0 vs. 3, p < 0.001).

Conclusion Cutaneous flaps yielded better motor function, self-perceived cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in our cohort of distal upper extremity reconstructions.

Keywords

upper extremity - reconstruction - free flap - microsurgery - range of motion - aesthetics - function - patient satisfaction - quality of life

Note

Presented at: 58th Congress of the German Society for Hand Surgery (DGH) 2018 in Mannheim, Germany.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Dezember 2020

Angenommen: 28. März 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Mai 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Scheker LR, Langley SJ, Martin DL, Julliard KN. Primary extensor tendon reconstruction in dorsal hand defects requiring free flaps. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (05) 568-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Scheker LR, Ahmed O. Radical debridement, free flap coverage, and immediate reconstruction of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 2007; 23 (01) 23-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zhang Y, Gazyakan E, Bigdeli AK, Will-Marks P, Kneser U, Hirche C. Soft tissue free flap for reconstruction of upper extremities: a meta-analysis on outcome and safety. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (05) 463-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thomas B, Warszawski J, Bigdeli A, Bickert B, Kneser U. [Retrospektive Matched-Pair-Analyse der Handfunktion nachWeichteildefektdeckung der oberen Extremität mittels freien fasziokutanen versus myokutanen Lappenplastiken]. 59. Kongress der Dtsch Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Mannheim, 11.-13.10.2018. Doi: 10.3205/18dgh072
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Friedrich JB, Katolik LI, Vedder NB. Soft tissue reconstruction of the hand. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (06) 1148-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kovacs L, Grob M, Zimmermann A. et al. Quality of life after severe hand injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2011; 64 (11) 1495-1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ono S, Sebastin SJ, Ohi H, Chung KC. Microsurgical flaps in repair and reconstruction of the hand. Hand Clin 2017; 33 (03) 425-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chim H, Ng ZY, Carlsen BT, Mohan AT, Saint-Cyr M. Soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity: an overview. Hand Clin 2014; 30 (04) 459-473 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dibbs R, Grome L, Pederson W. Free Tissue Transfer for Upper Extremity Reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33 (01) 17-23
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pederson WC. Upper extremity microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (06) 1524-1537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hallock GG. The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma. J Trauma 2002; 53 (01) 61-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Saint-Cyr M, Gupta A. Indications and selection of free flaps for soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 2007; 23 (01) 37-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Adkinson JM, Chung KC. Flap reconstruction of the elbow and forearm: a case-based approach. Hand Clin 2014; 30 (02) 153-163 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cayci C, Carlsen BT, Saint-Cyr M. Optimizing functional and aesthetic outcomes of upper limb soft tissue reconstruction. Hand Clin 2014; 30 (02) 225-238 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Calderon W, Chang N, Mathes SJ. Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (05) 785-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gosain A, Chang N, Mathes S, Hunt TK, Vasconez L. A study of the relationship between blood flow and bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (06) 1152-1162 , discussion 1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ng Z, Salgado C, Moran S, Chim H. Soft tissue coverage of the mangled upper extremity. Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29 (01) 048-054
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vogt PM, Boorboor P, Vaske B, Topsakal E, Schneider M, Muehlberger T. Significant angiogenic potential is present in the microenvironment of muscle flaps in humans. J Reconstr Microsurg 2005; 21 (08) 517-523
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harry LE, Sandison A, Paleolog EM, Hansen U, Pearse MF, Nanchahal J. Comparison of the healing of open tibial fractures covered with either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissue in a murine model. J Orthop Res 2008; 26 (09) 1238-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Harry LE, Sandison A, Pearse MF, Paleolog EM, Nanchahal J. Comparison of the vascularity of fasciocutaneous tissue and muscle for coverage of open tibial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (04) 1211-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liu R, Schindeler A, Little DG. The potential role of muscle in bone repair. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2010; 10 (01) 71-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Koepple C, Kallenberger A-K, Pollmann L. et al. Comparison of fasciocutaneous and muscle-based free flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (12) e2543 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002543.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Knobloch K, Kuehn M, Papst S, Kraemer R, Vogt PM. German standardized translation of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire for patient-related outcome measurement in Dupuytren disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 39e-40e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Knobloch K, Kraemer R, Papst S, Sorg H, Vogt PM. German version of the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: implications for early quality of life following collagenase injection in Dupuytren contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (05) 886e-887e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41 (10) 1359-1366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. The German SF-36 health survey translation and psychometric testing of a generic instrument for the assessment of health-related quality of life. J Public Health (Bangkok) 1995; 3 (01) 21-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, McIver E, Courtemanche DJ. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990; 11 (03) 256-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Moscona RA, Holander L, Or D, Fodor L. Patient satisfaction and aesthetic results after pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13 (12) 1739-1746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66 (02) 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 DGUV, [Messblatt für obere Gliedmassen (nach der Neutral - 0 - Methode)]. German Social Accident Insurance. Accessed April 19, 2021 https://www.dguv.de/medien/formtexte/aerzte/f_4222/f4222.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 DGUV, [Messblatt Finger (nach der Neutral-0-Methode)]. German Social Accident Insurance. Accessed April 19, 2021 https://www.dguv.de/medien/formtexte/aerzte/f_4220/f4220.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bigdeli AK, Thomas B, Falkner F, Gazyakan E, Hirche C, Kneser U. The Impact of indocyanine-green fluorescence angiography on intraoperative decision-making and postoperative outcome in free flap surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (08) 556-566
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 van Bekkum S, de Jong T, Zuidam M, Mureau MAM. Long-term quality of life after free flap upper extremity reconstruction for traumatic injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 213-222
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sabino J, Polfer E, Tintle S. et al. A decade of conflict: flap coverage options and outcomes in traumatic war-related extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (03) 895-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Li K, Zhang Z, Nicoli F. et al. Application of indocyanine green in flap surgery: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (02) 077-086
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ludolph I, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Schmitz M. Enhancing safety in reconstructive microsurgery using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography. Front Surg 2019; 6: 39 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00039.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sofiadellis F, Liu DS, Webb A, Macgill K, Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Fasciocutaneous free flaps are more reliable than muscle free flaps in lower limb trauma reconstruction: experience in a single trauma center. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (05) 333-340
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lee ZH, Abdou SA, Daar DA. et al. Comparing outcomes for fasciocutaneous versus muscle flaps in foot and ankle free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 646-651
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stranix JT, Lee Z-H, Jacoby A. et al. Forty years of lower extremity take-backs: flap type influences salvage outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 1282-1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (01) 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y) 2009; 4 (03) 311-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RW. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (03) 277-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 779e-787e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Seth AK, Iorio ML. Super-thin and suprafascial anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 466-473
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Maruccia M, Fallico N, Cigna E. et al. Suprafascial versus traditional harvesting technique for free antero lateral thigh flap: a case-control study to assess the best functional and aesthetic result in extremity reconstruction. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (08) 851-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Parrett BM, Bou-Merhi JS, Buntic RF, Safa B, Buncke GM, Brooks D. Refining outcomes in dorsal hand coverage: consideration of aesthetics and donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1630-1638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Yan H, Brooks D, Ladner R, Jackson WD, Gao W, Angel MF. Arterialized venous flaps: a review of the literature. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (06) 472-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Walle L, Vollbach FH, Fansa H. [Arterialized venous free flaps for resurfacing hand and finger defects]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2013; 45 (03) 160-166
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Roberts JM, Carr LW, Haley CT, Hauck RM, Michelotti BF. Venous flaps for revascularization and soft-tissue coverage in traumatic hand injuries: a systematic review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 104-109
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Chen C. Choices of soft tissue repairs: the need for outcomes assessments. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45 (07) 767-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar