J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(01): 041-046
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729883
Original Article

Reliability of Temporal Vascular Anastomosis and Techniques for Better Outcomes

Kentaro Tanaka
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Nobuko Suesada
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Tsutomu Homma
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hiroki Mori
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Mutsumi Okazaki
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Although there are several potential recipient vessels in the neck, those in the temporal region are limited. In skull base reconstruction, there are difficulties associated with the anastomosing recipient vessels in the neck region since long nutrient vessels are needed in the flap. We evaluated the reliability of temporal vascular anastomosis by comparing surgical outcomes between reconstructive methods and examined which surgical procedures may achieve better results.

Methods We examined the medical records of free tissue transfer cases between April 2007 and March 2018. Seventy-three surgeries were performed in the temporal region, including skull base reconstruction in 48, head and neck reconstruction (without skull base) in 16, and secondary surgery for head deformities in nine cases. In total, 445 neck surgeries were performed. Postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed.

Results The postoperative complication rates were 8.2 and 2.7% for all temporal and neck surgeries, respectively. There were no arterial complications in the temporal region and all of the six postoperative anastomotic complications were due to venous thrombosis. In contrast, there were 12 cases of vascular anastomotic complications, with six cases each of arterial and venous thrombosis in the neck. In the temporal region, the complication rate was 2.1% for skull base reconstruction, 11% for secondary revision, and 25% in head and neck reconstruction. The corresponding values for middle temporal vein (MTV) usage rates were 54, 22, and 25%. In skull base reconstruction, a coronal incision was made in all cases. A more frequent use of the MTV was associated with a reduced complication rate.

Conclusion The low complication rate in the temporal region was attributed to the wide surgical field and low tension of anastomotic vessels. Multiple venous anastomoses, including those of the MTV, are recommended to prevent complications.

Note

A part of this study was presented at the 10th Congress of the World Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, WSRM 2019, 12 − 15 June 2019, Bologna, Italy.




Publication History

Received: 08 January 2021

Accepted: 28 March 2021

Article published online:
29 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Xu H, Jazayeri L, Matros E, Henderson PW. Anatomy, exposure, and preparation of recipient vessels in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 97-110
  • 2 Imanishi N, Nakajima H, Minabe T, Chang H, Aiso S. Venous drainage architecture of the temporal and parietal regions: anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and vein. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2197-2203
  • 3 Hansen SL, Foster RD, Dosanjh AS, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY, Leon P. Superficial temporal artery and vein as recipient vessels for facial and scalp microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) 1879-1884
  • 4 Halvorson EG, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Wallin EF, Mehrara BJ. Superficial temporal recipient vessels in microvascular orbit and scalp reconstruction of oncologic defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (06) 383-387
  • 5 Li J, Shen Y, Wang L, Wang JB, Sun J, Haugen TW. Superficial temporal versus cervical recipient vessels in maxillary and midface free vascularized tissue reconstruction: our 14-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (08) 1786-1793
  • 6 Doscher M, Charafeddine AH, Schiff BA. et al. Superficial temporal artery and vein as recipient vessels for scalp and facial reconstruction: radiographic support for underused vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (04) 249-253
  • 7 Shimizu F, Lin MP, Ellabban M, Evans GR, Cheng MH. Superficial temporal vessels as a reserve recipient site for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in vessel-depleted neck. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (02) 134-138
  • 8 Shih HS, Hsieh CH, Feng GM, Feng WJ, Jeng SF. An alternative option to overcome difficult venous return in head and neck free flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (09) 1243-1247
  • 9 Yano T, Okazaki M, Yamaguchi K, Akita K. Anatomy of the middle temporal vein: implications for skull-base and craniofacial reconstruction using free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (01) 92e-101e
  • 10 Yano T, Tanaka K, Iida H, Kishimoto S, Okazaki M. Usability of the middle temporal vein as a recipient vessel for free tissue transfer in skull-base reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (03) 286-289
  • 11 Venkatesh V, Fracol M, Turin S, Ellis M, Alghoul M. Utilization of intraparotid segments of superficial temporal vessels for head and scalp free flap microanastomosis: a clinical, histological, and cadaveric study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 253-260
  • 12 Choi JW, Kim YC, Jeon DN. et al. Impact of recipient vein selection on venous patency and free flap survival in 652 head and neck reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 73-81
  • 13 Vaca EE, Purnell CA, Gosain AK, Alghoul MS. Postoperative temporal hollowing: is there a surgical approach that prevents this complication? A systematic review and anatomic illustration. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (03) 401-415