Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25(04): 538-545
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729884
Review Article

MRI of the Elbow: How to Do It

Shila Pazahr
1   Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Reto Sutter
1   Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Veronika Zubler
1   Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The diagnostic cascade for elbow complaints starts with the physical examination and radiographs that already can clarify or rule out many causes. Depending on the suspected pathology, additional imaging is necessary. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the advantage of accurately demonstrating a broad spectrum of diseases. The main indication for noncontrast MRI of the elbow is chronic epicondylitis. For magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography, it is suspected chondral and osteochondral abnormalities. Indirect MR arthrography is an option when direct arthrography is not practicable. MR arthrography of the elbow with traction is feasible, with promising results for the assessment of the radiocapitellar cartilage.

Keywords

elbow magnetic resonance imaging - elbow arthrography - elbow imaging


Publication History

Article published online:
27 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Laratta J, Caldwell JM, Lombardi J, Levine W, Ahmad C. Evaluation of common elbow pathologies: a focus on physical examination. Phys Sportsmed 2017; 45 (02) 184-190
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hausman MR, Lang P. Examination of the elbow: current concepts. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (12) 2534-2541
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Taljanovic MS, Hunter TB, Fitzpatrick KA, Krupinski EA, Pope TL. Musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: importance of radiography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (07) 403-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Crosby NE, Greenberg JA. Radiographic evaluation of the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (07) 1408-1414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Chronic Elbow Pain. Accessed February 20, 2021 at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69423/Narrative/
    PubMed
  • 6 Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Patterson SD. et al. The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (05) 684-686
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Zubler V, Saupe N, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Elbow stiffness: effectiveness of conventional radiography and CT to explain osseous causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (06) W515–W520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Martinoli C. Elbow US: anatomy, variants, and scanning technique. Radiology 2015; 275 (03) 636-650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Giovagnorio F, Pugliese F. Ultrasound of the elbow. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (11) 605-614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kijowski R, Tuite M, Sanford M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Part II: Abnormalities of the ligaments, tendons, and nerves. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34 (01) 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Grainger AJ, Elliott JM, Campbell RS, Tirman PF, Steinbach LS, Genant HK. Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use. Clin Radiol 2000; 55 (03) 163-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Allen GM, Johnson R. Radiographic/MR imaging correlation of the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2019; 27 (04) 587-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Chung CB, Stanley AJ, Gentili A. Magnetic resonance imaging of elbow instability. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005; 9 (01) 67-76
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Coel M, Yamada CY, Ko J. MR imaging of patients with lateral epicondylitis of the elbow (tennis elbow): importance of increased signal of the anconeus muscle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (05) 1019-1021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fritz RC, Steinbach LS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: Part 3. The elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (324) 321-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kijowski R, De Smet AA. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with medial epicondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34 (04) 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Potter HG, Weiland AJ, Schatz JA, Paletta GA, Hotchkiss RN. Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow: usefulness of MR imaging in diagnosis. Radiology 1997; 204 (01) 185-189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Chauvin NA, Gustas-French CN. Magnetic resonance imaging of elbow injuries in children. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49 (12) 1629-1642
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K. et al. Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (04) 784-791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Quinn SF, Haberman JJ, Fitzgerald SW, Traughber PD, Belkin RI, Murray WT. Evaluation of loose bodies in the elbow with MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4 (02) 169-172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Anderson MW. Imaging of upper extremity stress fractures in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25 (03) 489-504 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Beltran J. MR features of nerve disorders at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5 (03) 545-565
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bäumer P, Dombert T, Staub F. et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography—nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology 2011; 260 (01) 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Keen NN, Chin CT, Engstrom JW, Saloner D, Steinbach LS. Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using magnetic resonance neurography. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (04) 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004; 12 (02) 247-263 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS. Diagnosis of compressive and entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremity: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (03) 525-531
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Festa A, Mulieri PJ, Newman JS, Spitz DJ, Leslie BM. Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting partial and complete distal biceps tendon rupture. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (01) 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Williams BD, Schweitzer ME, Weishaupt D. et al. Partial tears of the distal biceps tendon: MR appearance and associated clinical findings. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (10) 560-564
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Skaf AY, Boutin RD, Dantas RW. et al. Bicipitoradial bursitis: MR imaging findings in eight patients and anatomic data from contrast material opacification of bursae followed by routine radiography and MR imaging in cadavers. Radiology 1999; 212 (01) 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lee HI, Koh KH, Kim JP, Jaegal M, Kim Y, Park MJ. Prominent synovial plicae in radiocapitellar joints as a potential cause of lateral elbow pain: clinico-radiologic correlation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (08) 1349-1356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Johnson D, Stevens KJ, Riley G, Shapiro L, Yoshioka H, Gold GE. Approach to MR imaging of the elbow and wrist: technical aspects and innovation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015; 23 (03) 355-366
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Soft-Tissue Masses. Accessed February 20, 2021 at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69434/Narrative/
    PubMed
  • 33 American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Primary Bone Tumors. Accessed February 20, 2021 at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69421/Narrative/
    PubMed
  • 34 Sonin AH, Tutton SM, Fitzgerald SW, Peduto AJ. MR imaging of the adult elbow. Radiographics 1996; 16 (06) 1323-1336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Jbara M, Patnana M, Kazmi F, Beltran J. MR imaging: Arthropathies and infectious conditions of the elbow, wrist, and hand. Radiol Clin North Am 2006; 44 (04) 625-642 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Murphy BJ. MR imaging of the elbow. Radiology 1992; 184 (02) 525-529
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Potter HG, Hannafin JA, Morwessel RM, DiCarlo EF, O'Brien SJ, Altchek DW. Lateral epicondylitis: correlation of MR imaging, surgical, and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1995; 196 (01) 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kaplan LJ, Potter HG. MR imaging of ligament injuries to the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004; 12 (02) 221-232 , v–vi
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hauptfleisch J, English C, Murphy D. Elbow magnetic resonance imaging: imaging anatomy and evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 24 (02) 93-107
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Schenkels E, Caekebeke P, Swinnen L, Peeters J, van Riet R. Is the flexion-abduction-supination magnetic resonance imaging view more accurate than standard magnetic resonance imaging in detecting distal biceps pathology?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29 (12) 2654-2660
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Giuffrè BM, Moss MJ. Optimal positioning for MRI of the distal biceps brachii tendon: flexed abducted supinated view. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (04) 944-946
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kramer J, Recht MP, Imhof H, Stiglbaüer R, Engel A. Postcontrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18 (02) 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Omoumi P, Mercier GA, Lecouvet F, Simoni P, Vande Berg BC. CT arthrography, MR arthrography, PET, and scintigraphy in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47 (04) 595-615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Delport AG, Zoga AC. MR and CT arthrography of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012; 16 (01) 15-26
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 LiMarzi GM, O'Dell MC, Scherer K, Pettis C, Wasyliw CW, Bancroft LW. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the wrist and elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015; 23: 441-455
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Schwartz ML, al-Zahrani S, Morwessel RM, Andrews JR. Ulnar collateral ligament injury in the throwing athlete: evaluation with saline-enhanced MR arthrography. Radiology 1995; 197 (01) 297-299
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Timmerman LA, Schwartz ML, Andrews JR. Preoperative evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography. Evaluation in 25 baseball players with surgical confirmation. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (01) 26-31 ; discussion 32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Mirowitz SA, London SL. Ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1992; 185 (02) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Nakanishi K, Masatomi T, Ochi T. et al. MR arthrography of elbow: evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of elbow. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25 (07) 629-634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Carrino JA, Smith DK, Schweitzer ME. MR arthrography of the elbow and wrist. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1998; 2 (04) 397-414
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Magee T. Accuracy of 3-T MR arthrography versus conventional 3-T MRI of elbow tendons and ligaments compared with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204 (01) W70-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Fritz RC. MR imaging of osteochondral and articular lesions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5 (03) 579-602
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C, Silvestri E, Tagliafico AS. How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol 2018; 28 (06) 2356-2368
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Buckwalter KACT. CT arthrography. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25 (04) 899-915
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Mak S, Beltran LS, Bencardino J. et al. MRI of the annular ligament of the elbow: review of anatomic considerations and pathologic findings in patients with posterolateral elbow instability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203 (06) 1272-1279
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Gebhard M, Wohlgemuth WA. et al. MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Van Den Broek M, Van Riet R. Intra-articular capacity of the elbow joint. Clin Anat 2017; 30 (06) 795-798
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Rastogi AK, Davis KW, Ross A, Rosas HG. Fundamentals of +. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (03) 484-494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ, Gylys-Morin V. et al. The effect of intra-articular gadolinium-DTPA on synovial membrane and cartilage. Invest Radiol 1990; 25 (02) 179-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Andreisek G, Duc SR, Froehlich JM, Hodler J, Weishaupt D. MR arthrography of the shoulder, hip, and wrist: evaluation of contrast dynamics and image quality with increasing injection-to-imaging time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (04) 1081-1088
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U, Keating D, Oestmann J, Grabbe E. MR arthrography of the shoulder with gadopentetate dimeglumine: influence of concentration, iodinated contrast material, and time on signal intensity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (03) 621-623
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics 2002; 22 (05) 1223-1246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Lohman M, Borrero C, Casagranda B, Rafiee B, Towers J. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique?. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38 (05) 513-516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Lee RKL, Griffith JF, Yuen BTY, Ng AWH, Yeung DKW. Elbow MR arthrography with traction. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1064): 20160378
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Klaan B, Wuennemann F, Kintzelé L, Gersing AS, Weber MA. MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : indications and implementation. [in German]. Radiologe 2019; 59 (08) 710-721
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Winalski CS, Aliabadi P, Wright RJ, Shortkroff S, Sledge CB, Weissman BN. Enhancement of joint fluid with intravenously administered gadopentetate dimeglumine: technique, rationale, and implications. Radiology 1993; 187 (01) 179-185
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Schweitzer ME, Natale P, Winalski CS, Culp R. Indirect wrist MR arthrography: the effects of passive motion versus active exercise. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29 (01) 10-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Vahlensieck M, Peterfy CG, Wischer T. et al. Indirect MR arthrography: optimization and clinical applications. Radiology 1996; 200 (01) 249-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Vahlensieck M, Sommer T, Textor J. et al. Indirect MR arthrography: techniques and applications. Eur Radiol 1998; 8 (02) 232-235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Bergin D, Schweitzer ME. Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (10) 551-558
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Husarik DB, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Jost B, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects—normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. Radiology 2009; 252 (01) 148-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar