Abstract
Context Lack of awareness among the students in the medical field is the greatest challenge
to overcome in the emergence of contemporary interventional radiology (IR).
Objectives We aimed to conduct a survey among medical students of Jazan University to explore
their knowledge about IR, interest in IR as a future career, and preferred methods
of training in IR.
Materials and Methods This was a cross-sectional, self-directed questionnaire study. The target population
was all medical students at Jazan University. Surveys were sent to 600 students. The
questionnaire consisted of 11 closed and open-ended questions.
Statistical Analysis We calculated the size of the sample using the Raosoft Sample Size Calculator Web
site. Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistics.
Results A total of 270 students responded (45%); more than half of the respondents (58.5%)
were in the preclinical stage, while the rest were in the clinical stage. About 62.5%
of clinical students and 66.4% preclinical students reported that their perception
regarding the terminology of IR was good or excellent. Regarding the identification
of interventional radiologists, 50.9% from the clinical students thought them to be
radiologists and 50% from preclinical students also identified them as such.
About 29.5% from the clinical students and 27.8% from the preclinical students thought
them special surgeons, and 31.3% clinical students compared with 30.4% preclinical
students believed they are vascular surgeons working with X-rays. About 19.6% clinical
students compared with 17.7% preclinical students said they are general surgeons working
with X-rays, and 48.2% clinical students compared with 45.6% preclinical students
said they are special radiologists who work with percutaneous techniques. There was
a significant difference (p = 0.041) in the responses between preclinical and clinical students regarding knowledge
about what this medical specialty does. About 60.8% of clinical students reported
that their knowledge and information regarding IR are efficient in comparison to 39.2%
of preclinical students.
Conclusion This study demonstrated that the basic knowledge among Jazan medical students is
poor. About half of the respondents were clinical students who understood the radiology
specialty, compared with one-third of preclinical students. This could impact the
student’s decision toward IR as a future career.
Keywords
awareness - interventional radiology - medical students - Jazan
