Robotic Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Linsen T. Samuel; Jaret M. Karnuta; Aditya Banerjee; Isaac Briskin; William A. Cantrell; Joseph W. George; Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda; Atul F. Kamath; Anton Khlopas; Alison Klika; Viktor E. Krebs; Nathan W. Mesko; Michael A. Mont; Trevor G. Murray; Nicolas S. Piuzzi; Paras Shah; Kim Stearns; Assem A. Sultan; Robert M. Molloy

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731323

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Table of Contents

J Knee Surg 2023; 36(01): 105-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731323

Original Article

Robotic Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Linsen T. Samuel

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Jaret M. Karnuta

²School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Aditya Banerjee

²School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Isaac Briskin

³Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

William A. Cantrell

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Joseph W. George

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Atul F. Kamath

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Anton Khlopas

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Alison Klika

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Viktor E. Krebs

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Nathan W. Mesko

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Michael A. Mont

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Trevor G. Murray

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Nicolas S. Piuzzi

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Paras Shah

²School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Kim Stearns

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Assem A. Sultan

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

,

Robert M. Molloy

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare (1) operative time, (2) in-hospital pain scores, (3) opioid medication use, (4) length of stay (LOS), (5) discharge disposition at 90-day postoperative, (6) range of motion (ROM), (7) number of physical therapy (PT) visits, (8) emergency department (ED) visits, (9) readmissions, (10) reoperations, (11) complications, and (12) 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in propensity matched patient cohorts who underwent robotic arm-assisted (RA) versus manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using a prospectively collected institutional database, patients who underwent RA- and manual TKA were the nearest neighbor propensity score matched 3:1 (255 manual TKA:85 RA-TKA), accounting for various preoperative characteristics. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal–Wallis, Pearson's Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests, when appropriate. Postoperative pain scores, opioid use, ED visits, readmissions, and 1-year PROMs were similar between the cohorts. Manual TKA patients achieved higher maximum flexion ROM (120.3 ± 9.9 versus 117.8 ± 10.2, p = 0.043) with no statistical differences in other ROM parameters. Manual TKA had shorter operative time (105 vs.113 minutes, p < 0.001), and fewer PT visits (median [interquartile range] = 10.0 [8.0–13.0] vs. 11.5 [9.5–15.5] visits, p = 0.014). RA-TKA had shorter LOS (0.48 ± 0.59 vs.1.2 ± 0.59 days, p < 0.001) and higher proportion of home discharges (p < 0.001). RA-TKA and manual TKA had similar postoperative complications and 1-year PROMs. Although RA-TKA patients had longer operative times, they had shorter LOS and higher propensity for home discharge. In an era of value-based care models and the steady shift to outpatient TKA, these trends need to be explored further. Long-term and randomized controlled studies may help determine potential added value of RA-TKA versus manual TKA. This study reflects level of evidence III.

Keywords

robotic arm-assisted - total knee arthroplasty - manual - postoperative outcomes - propensity score matched - patient-reported outcome measure

Full Text

References

References
1 Elmallah RK, Cherian JJ, Jauregui JJ, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Beaver WB, Mont MA. Determining health-related quality-of-life outcomes using the SF-6D preference-based measure in patients following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (07) 1150-1153
2 Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A. et al. Determining cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee arthroplasty using the Short Form-6D utility measure. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (02) 351-354
3 Roth A, Khlopas A, George J. et al. The effect of body mass index on 30-day complications after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7S): S242-S248
4 George J, Chughtai M, Khlopas A. et al. Readmission, reoperation, and complications: total hip vs total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (03) 655-660
5 Mont MA, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Newman JM, Deren M, Sultan AA. Value proposition of robotic total knee arthroplasty: what can robotic technology deliver in 2018 and beyond?. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018; 15 (09) 619-630
6 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M. et al. Does the robotic arm and preoperative CT planning help with 3D intraoperative total knee arthroplasty planning?. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (08) 742-749
7 Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, Chughtai M, Molloy RM, Mont MA. Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (07) 2002-2006
8 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi N. et al. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 17-21
9 Naziri Q, Cusson BC, Chaudhri M, Shah NV, Sastry A. Making the transition from traditional to robotic-arm assisted TKA: What to expect? A single-surgeon comparative-analysis of the first-40 consecutive cases. J Orthop 2019; 16 (04) 364-368
10 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Ehiorobo JO. et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformity. Surg Technol Int 2019; 34: 497-502
11 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. et al. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 2-5
12 Marchand RC, Khlopas A, Sodhi N. et al. Difficult cases in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a case series. J Knee Surg 2017; 31 (01) 27-37
13 Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1132-1141
14 Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (03) 239-250
15 Sultan AA, Samuel LT, Khlopas A. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty more accurately restored the posterior condylar offset ratio and the Insall-Salvati index compared to the manual technique; a cohort-matched study. Surg Technol Int 2019; 34: 409-413
16 Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2496-2501
17 Sultan AA, Piuzzi N, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Mont MA. Utilization of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty for soft tissue protection. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14 (12) 925-927
18 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
19 Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (07) 930-937
20 Marchand RC. et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30: 849-853
21 Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Hozack WJ. et al. Patient-reported functional and satisfaction outcomes after robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective multicenter investigation. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (07) 685-690
22 Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64
23 Kronzer VL, Jerry MR, Ben Abdallah A. et al. Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures. Qual Life Res 2017; 26 (08) 2093-2102
24 Cleveland O, Piuzzi NS, Strnad G. et al; OME Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedics. Implementing a scientifically valid, cost-effective, and scalable data collection system at point of care: the Cleveland clinic OME cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (05) 458-464
25 Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication?. World J Surg 2008; 32 (06) 939-941
26 Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR. et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56 (01) e1-e25
27 Kaufman MG, Meaike JD, Izaddoost SA. Orthopedic prosthetic infections: diagnosis and orthopedic salvage. Semin Plast Surg 2016; 30 (02) 66-72
28 Patel R. Aseptic failure in total knee arthroplasty. In: Rodríguez-Merchán EC, Oussedik S. eds. Total Knee Arthroplasty. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015: 183-196
29 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Anis HK. et al. One-year patient outcomes for robotic-arm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (11) 1063-1068
30 Piuzzi NS, Strnad GJ, Sakr Esa WA. et al; Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Group. The main predictors of length of stay after total knee arthroplasty: patient-related or procedure-related risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (12) 1093-1101
31 Cool CL, Jacofsky DJ, Seeger KA, Sodhi N, Mont MA. A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8 (05) 327-336
32 Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Robarts SF. Modelling knee range of motion post arthroplasty: clinical applications. Physiother Can 2010; 62 (04) 378-387
33 Carvalho E, Bettger JP, Goode AP. Insurance coverage, costs, and barriers to care for outpatient musculoskeletal therapy and rehabilitation services. N C Med J 2017; 78 (05) 312-314