Radiographic Study in Patients Submitted to Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasties: Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years^[*]

Abstract

Objective Radiographic evaluate if there are signs of early loosening of the cementless total knee arthroplasties Amplitude-Score® (Amplitude Surgical SAS, Valence, France), checking with a follow-up time ranging from 2 to 5.75 years (mean of 3.75 years).

Methods Descriptive longitudinal investigation of observational nature, non-comparative, through a static radiographic study of annual control, of a case series, in a single center, all operated on by the same surgeon (S.M.). All cementless arthroplasties that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria performed from March 2012 to October 2014 were included.

Results Among the 46 cementless knee arthroplasties evaluated in 40 patients, no radiographic signs of early loosening were verified.

Conclusion Cementless arthroplasty promotes optimal osteointegration, with no early release, and it is essential that the surgical technique is perfectly respected.

Keywords

arthroplasty, replacement, knee - arthrosis - knee prosthesis - cementation

^* Study carried out at the Knee Surgery Service of the Instituto de Fraturas, Ortopedia e Reabilitação (IFOR), São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. April 2020

Angenommen: 01. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Oktober 2021

• Referências

• 1 Silva PMGO. Prótese total do joelho – a história da arte: revisão bibliográfica [dissertação]. Covilhã: Universidade da Beira Interior; 2010
• 2 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
• 3 Harwin SF, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Mont MA. Outcomes of a newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty design. Orthopedics 2015; 38 (10) 620-624
• 4 Harwin SF, Kester MA, Malkani AL, Manley MT. Excellent fixation achieved with cementless posteriorly stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (01) 7-13
• 5 Lombardi Jr AV, Berasi Jr CC, Berend KR. Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (04, Suppl 1): 25-29
• 6 Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (01) 53-64
• 7 O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design : five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (08) 1362-1371
• 8 Noble PC, Conditt MA, Thompson MT. et al. Extraarticular abrasive wear in cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416) 120-128
• 9 Bert JM, McShane M. Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 73-78
• 10 Clarke MT, Green JS, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Cement as a risk factor for deep-vein thrombosis. Comparison of cemented TKR, uncemented TKR and cemented THR. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (04) 611-613
• 11 Nilsson KG, Kärrholm J, Carlsson L, Dalén T. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (01) 9-20
• 12 Gao F, Henricson A, Nilsson KG. Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study. Knee 2009; 16 (03) 200-206
• 13 Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto OdeA, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10 (10) CD006193
• 14 Aebli N, Krebs J, Schwenke D, Hii T, Wehrli U. Progression of radiolucent lines in cementless twin-bearing low-contact-stress knee prostheses: a retrospective study. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (06) 783-789
• 15 Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 9-12
• 16 Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (09) 1158-1163
• 17 Hungerford DS, Kenna RV, Krackow KA. The porous-coated anatomic total knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1982; 13 (01) 103-122
• 18 Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Lewis PL, Nott L. The Miller-Galante knee prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthrosis. A comparison of the results of partial fixation with cement and fixation without any cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (03) 402-408
• 19 Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Ceramic coating improves tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (08) 882-889
• 20 Tírico LEP, Pasqualin T, Pécora JO, Gobbi RG, Pécora JR, Demange MK. Study on implant stability in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (04) 230-234
• 21 Brown TE, Harper BL, Bjorgul K. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (05) 380-387
• 22 Bagsby DT, Issa K, Smith LS. et al. Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (08) 1727-1731
• 23 Stähelin T, Kessler O, Pfirrmann C, Jacob HA, Romero J. Fluoroscopically assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (04) 513-515