Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2022; 57(03): 462-466
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731418
Artigo Original

Arthroscopic Bankart Procedure: Clinical Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years

Article in several languages: português | English
Pedro Couto Godinho 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
André Couto Godinho 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
João Victor de Campos Gomes Rondon 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
Francisco Cabral de Oliveira Neto 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
Thiago de Abreu Alves 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
,
Glaydson Gomes Godinho 
1   Serviço de Ombro, Hospital Ortopédico BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the functional outcome of patients submitted to arthroscopic Bankart repair in the long-term.

Methods Retrospective evaluation of 41 patients (45 shoulders) operated between 1996 and 2009 followed-up for a mean period of 14.89 years. Functional scores were analyzed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Carter-Rowe scores, physical examination, and analysis of medical records.

Results The Carter-Rowe score showed an average improvement of 46.11 points, with a final average of 85.89 points, and the UCLA score showed an average improvement of 31.33 points. Ten patients (22.22%) relapsed, with the number of preoperative dislocations being the most correlated factor.

Conclusion It was demonstrated that the number of preoperative dislocations negatively influenced the failure rate.

Keywords

shoulder - joint instability - arthroscopy - recurrence

Financial Support

There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.


Study carried out by the Shoulder Surgery and Rehabilitation Group of Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 15 June 2020

Accepted: 11 February 2021

Article published online:
28 October 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Rollick NC, Ono Y, Kurji HM. et al. Long-term outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet repairs: a systematic review. Open Access J Sports Med 2017; 8 (08) 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Owens BD, Harrast JJ, Hurwitz SR, Thompson TL, Wolf JM. Surgical trends in Bankart repair: an analysis of data from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery certification examination. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (09) 1865-1869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Green MR, Christensen KP. Arthroscopic versus open Bankart procedures: a comparison of early morbidity and complications. Arthroscopy 1993; 9 (04) 371-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hohmann E, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Open versus arthroscopic surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis over the past 20 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (10) 1873-1880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Godinho GG, França FO, Freitas JM. et al. Tratamento artroscópico da instabilidade anterior traumática do ombro: resultados a longo prazo e fatores de risco. Rev Bras Ortop 2008; 43 (05) 157-166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Flinkkilä T, Knape R, Sirniö K, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair: Minimum 10 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (01) 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aboalata M, Plath JE, Seppel G, Juretzko J, Vogt S, Imhoff AB. Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior-Inferior Shoulder Instability at 13-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (04) 782-787
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Castagna A, Markopoulos N, Conti M, Delle Rose G, Papadakou E, Garofalo R. Arthroscopic bankart suture-anchor repair: radiological and clinical outcome at minimum 10 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 2012-2016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vermeulen AE, Landman EBM, Veen EJD, Nienhuis S, Koorevaar CT. Long-term clinical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28 (05) e137-e143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Plath JE, Aboalata M, Seppel G. et al. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dislocation Arthropathy: Radiological Long-term Outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in 100 Shoulders at an Average 13-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (05) 1084-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Zimmermann SM, Scheyerer MJ, Farshad M, Catanzaro S, Rahm S, Gerber C. Long-Term Restoration of Anterior Shoulder Stability: A Retrospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet Procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (23) 1954-1961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elmlund A, Kartus C, Sernert N, Hultenheim I, Ejerhed L. A long-term clinical follow-up study after arthroscopic intra-articular Bankart repair using absorbable tacks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (07) 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ono Y, Dávalos Herrera DA, Woodmass JM. et al. Long-term outcomes following isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 9- to 12-year follow-up. JSES Open Access 2019; 3 (03) 189-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Giordano G. et al. Long-term outcomes after repair of recurrent post-traumatic anterior shoulder instability: comparison of arthroscopic transglenoid suture and open Bankart reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (05) 816-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, Terwee CB, Dijksman LM, Kleinjan G, Willems WJ. Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (11) 2396-2403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bernageau J, Patte D, Debeyre J, Ferrane J. Intérêt du profil glénoïdien dans les luxations récidivantes de l'épaule. Value of the glenoid profil in recurrent luxations of the shoulder. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1976; 62 (02) 142-147
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Samilson RL, Prieto V. Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 (04) 456-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rowe CR. Prognosis in dislocations of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956; 38-A (05) 957-977
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (08) 1136-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973; 32 (05) 413-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bessière C, Trojani C, Carles M, Mehta SS, Boileau P. The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (08) 2345-2351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Storti TM, Lima RA, Costa EBES, Simionatto JE, Simionatto C, Paniago AF. Avaliação pós-operatória de pacientes submetidos ao reparo artroscópico de instabilidade anterior do ombro. Rev Bras Ortop 2020; 55 (03) 339-346
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 van Gastel ML, Willigenburg NW, Dijksman LM. et al. Ten percent re-dislocation rate 13 years after the arthroscopic Bankart procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (12) 3929-3936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Marquardt B, Witt KA, Götze C, Liem D, Steinbeck J, Pötzl W. Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with a bioabsorbable tack. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (12) 1906-1910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 de Almeida Filho IA, de Castro Veado MA, Fim M, da Silva Corrêa LV, de Carvalho Junior AER. Functional assessment of arthroscopic repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Rev Bras Ortop 2012; Mar; 47 (02) 214-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (11) 1470-1477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Thomazeau H, Langlais T, Hardy A. et al. French Arthroscopy Society. Long-term, prospective, multicenter study of isolated Bankart repair for a patient selection method based on the Instability Severity Index Score. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (05) 1057-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hatta T, Yamamoto N, Shinagawa K, Kawakami J, Itoi E. Surgical decision making based on the on-track/off-track concept for anterior shoulder instability: a case-control study. JSES Open Access 2019; 3 (01) 25-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kavaja L, Pajarinen J, Sinisaari I. et al. Arthrosis of glenohumeral joint after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a long-term follow-up of 13 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (03) 350-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Privitera DM, Bisson LJ, Marzo JM. Minimum 10-year follow-up of arthroscopic intra-articular Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (01) 100-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar