Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2021; 12(02): 071-077
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731960
Review Article

A Descriptive Analysis of Capsule Endoscopy Events in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database

Hangyu Ji
1   China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang’anmen Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
,
Shaoli Wang
1   China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang’anmen Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
,
Yang Gong
2   School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction The malfunction of capsule endoscopy (CE) devices is a significant reason for the failure of CE procedures, which could hinder and prevent diagnosis. Unfortunately, malfunction-related adverse events (AEs) caused by CE devices are rarely reported in publications. Although most malfunction-related AEs could not lead to physical harm, they could reduce the efficiency of medical care and increase medical costs. The manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database, a publicly accessible resource for patient safety, contains not only the common complications of CE but also valuable malfunction-related AEs, which have been underutilized. Therefore, the study aims to discover and analyze the possible AEs associated with CE and demonstrate the utility of the MAUDE reports to promote patient safety.

Materials and Methods We acquired MAUDE reports of CE systems from January 01, 2008, to July 31, 2020, through a systematic search strategy. We utilized the manufacturers, brand names, and product codes as search terms from which medical device reports including structured data and narrative texts were extracted, followed by a manual review of the narrative texts, reporter occupation, device involved, event type and the phase of the event; finally, patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed as per CE categories and characteristics.

Results A total of 377 CEs medical device reports were retrieved, and 342 reports were included after reviewing. There were 327 mandatory reports (96%) and 15 voluntary reports (4%). These reports referred to capsule endoscope (n = 213), sensing system (n = 66), patency capsule (n = 38), and capsule delivery device (n = 26). A total of 349 CE-related AEs were identified, including complications (n = 228), malfunction-related AEs (n = 109), and other events (n = 12). The composition of AEs was not the same for the CE devices. Complications were major AEs of capsule endoscope and patency capsule, but malfunction-related AEs were the most common in AEs of sensing systems and capsule delivery devices.

Conclusion MAUDE serves as an invaluable data source for investigating malfunction-related AEs. In addition to common complications, malfunction of CE devices could threaten patient safety in CE procedures. Improving awareness of the malfunction of CE devices and raising adequate training for staff working in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic units could be critical and beneficial in preventing malfunction-related AEs.

Keywords

adverse events - capsule endoscopy - patient safety


Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2021

© 2021. Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 FDA. What is a Serious Adverse Event? Available at: https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event. Accessed June 25, 2021
  • 2 Patient Safety Network (PSNet). Adverse Events, Near Misses, and Errors. Available at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/adverse-events-near-misses-and-errors. Accessed March 8, 2021
  • 3 Jha AK, Larizgoitia I, Audera-Lopez C, Prasopa-Plaizier N, Waters H, Bates DW. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22 (10) 809-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 World Health Organization & World Alliance for Patient Safety. Research Priority Setting Working Group. Summary of the evidence on patient safety : implications for research / Edited by Ashish Jha Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43874 Accessed May 5, 2021
  • 5 Brown SL, Bright RA, Tavris DR. Medical device epidemiology and surveillance: patient safety is the bottom line. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004; 1 (01) 1-2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Matharoo M, Haycock A, Sevdalis N, Thomas-Gibson S. A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5 (01) E83-E89
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Tremaine AM, Avram MM. FDA MAUDE data on complications with lasers, light sources, and energy-based devices. Lasers Surg Med 2015; 47 (02) 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405 (67/85) 417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wang A, Banerjee S, Barth BA. et al. ASGE Technology Committee. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78 (06) 805-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hosoe N, Takabayashi K, Ogata H, Kanai T. Capsule endoscopy for small-intestinal disorders: Current status. Dig Endosc 2019; 31 (05) 498-507
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Blanco-Velasco G, Palos-Cuellar R, Domínguez-García MR. et al. Utility of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2020;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pai AK, Jonas MM, Fox VL. Esophageal capsule endoscopy in children and young adults with portal hypertension. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69 (06) 641-647
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (04) 352-376
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Karargyris A. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19 (24) 3726-3746
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ho KK, Joyce AM. Complications of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2007; 17 (01) 169-178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Rondonotti E. Capsule retention: prevention, diagnosis and management. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5 (09) 198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Boysen M, Ritter M. Small bowel obstruction from capsule endoscopy. West J Emerg Med 2010; 11 (01) 71-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Palmer JS, Marenah K, El F Madani, Jain K, Gupta S. Small bowel perforation following capsule endoscopy: a case report. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93 (06) e69-e70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Yung DE, Plevris JN, Koulaouzidis A. Short article: Aspiration of capsule endoscopes: a comprehensive review of the existing literature. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 29 (04) 428-434
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ensign LG, Cohen KB. A primer to the structure, content and linkage of the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Files. EGEMS (Wash DC 2017; 5 (01) 12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320 (72/37) 768-770
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kang H, Gong Y. Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model. J Biomed Inform 2020; 110: 103556
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Yao B, Kang H, Wang J, Zhou S, Gong Y. Exploring health information technology events from FDA MAUDE database. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2018; 250: 187-191
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kang H, Wang F, Zhou S, Miao Q, Gong Y. Identifying and synchronizing health information technology (HIT) events from FDA medical device reports. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 1048-1052
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Kang H, Yu Z, Gong Y. Initializing and growing a database of Health Information Technology (HIT) events by using TF-IDF and Biterm Topic Modeling. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2017: 1024-1033
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wang E, Kang H, Gong Y. Generating a health information technology event database from FDA MAUDE reports. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2017; 264: 883-887
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Van de Bruaene C, De Looze D, Hindryckx P. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: Where are we after almost 15 years of use?. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7 (01) 13-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wang J, Liang H, Kang H, Gong Y. Understanding health information technology induced medication safety events by two conceptual frameworks. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 158-167
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Lawal OD, Mohanty M, Elder H. et al. The nature, magnitude, and reporting compliance of device-related events for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17 (04) 347-357
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Friedman DCW, Lendvay TS, Hannaford B. Instrument failures for the da Vinci surgical system: a Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database Study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (05) 1503-1508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Thennukonda RA, Natarajan BR. Adverse events associated with ultrasonic scalers: A manufacturer and user facility device experience database analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26 (06) 598-602
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (03) i68-i74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R, Lewis BS. ICCE. ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy 2005; 37 (10) 1065-1067
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sidhu R, Sanders DS, Morris AJ, McAlindon ME. Guidelines on small bowel enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in adults. Gut 2008; 57 (01) 125-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Lee HS, Lim YJ, Kim KO. et al. Research Group for Capsule Endoscopy/Small Bowel Endoscopy. Outcomes and management strategies for capsule retention: a Korean Capsule Endoscopy Nationwide Database Registry Study. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64 (11) 3240-3246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mannami T, Ikeda G, Seno S. et al. Capsule endoscope aspiration after repeated attempts for ingesting a patency capsule. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2015; 9 (03) 347-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Deas Jr T, Sinsel L. Ensuring patient safety and optimizing efficiency during gastrointestinal endoscopy. AORN J 2014; 99 (03) 396-406
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Enns RA, Hookey L, Armstrong D. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2017; 152 (03) 497-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rondonotti E, Herrerias JM, Pennazio M, Caunedo A, Mascarenhas-Saraiva M, de Franchis R. Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62 (05) 712-716
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Hebballi NB, Ramoni R, Kalenderian E. et al. The dangers of dental devices as reported in the food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146 (02) 102-110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Leighton JA, Srivathsan K, Carey EJ. et al. Safety of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100 (08) 1728-1731
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Bandorski D, Höltgen R, Stunder D, Keuchel M. Capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and left heart assist devices. Ann Gastroenterol 2014; 27 (01) 3-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Gurtcheff SE. Introduction to the MAUDE database. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51 (01) 120-123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar