Partial Flap Loss in Gender Affirming Phalloplasty

Abstract

Background Flaps used in phalloplasty are larger than described for other indications, with a design that is tubularized up to two times. While the incidence of partial flap loss (PFL) is well described, current literature lacks granularity comparing donor sites and techniques with minimal discussion of etiology and management. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with PFL in phalloplasty.

Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent phalloplasty by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2016 and 2020. PFL was defined as any patient requiring sharp excision of necrotic tissue and reconstruction. Patient variables (demographics, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, comorbidities), flap variables (donor site, design, dimensions, perforator number) and intraoperative variables (use of vasopressors, intraoperative fluid volume) were collected.

Results Of 76 phalloplasties, 6 patients suffered PFL (7.9%). 5/6 patients were radial forearm free flap tube-within-tube (TWT) and 1/5 patients were pedicled anterolateral thigh TWT. 4/6 cases involved the shaft only and were treated with excision ± Integra and full-thickness skin grafting. 2 cases of PFL involved the urethral extension requiring excision of the necrotic segment.

Conclusion PFL occurred in 7.9% of cases and was solely found in the TWT cohort. The majority of cases involved the shaft, sparing the urethral segment. Cases in the acute postoperative period appeared to be related to macrovascular venous congestion, while cases in the subacute period appeared to be due to microvascular arterial ischemia.

Keywords

phalloplasty - transgender - gender affirmation - free flap

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Januar 2021

Angenommen: 12. Mai 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Juli 2021

• References

• 1 Hage JJ, De Graaf FH. Addressing the ideal requirements by free flap phalloplasty: some reflections on refinements of technique. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (09) 592-598
• 2 Morrison SD, Massie JP, Dellon AL. Genital sensibility in the neophallus: getting a sense of the current literature and techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (02) 129-137
• 3 Felici N, Felici A. A new phalloplasty technique: the free anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (02) 153-157
• 4 Hage JJ, Bouman FG, de Graaf FH, Bloem JJ. Construction of the neophallus in female-to-male transsexuals: the Amsterdam experience. J Urol 1993; 149 (06) 1463-1468
• 5 Cylinder I, Heston A, Jedrzejewski B, Sikora Z, Peters B, Berli JU. Partial flap loss in transgender phalloplasty using the anterolateral thigh or forearm - a systematic literature review. Plast Aesthet Res 2020; 7: 58
• 6 Coleman EB, Botzer M, Cohen-Kettenis P. et al. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgenderism 2012; 13: 165-232
• 7 Garcia MM, Christopher NA, De Luca F, Spilotros M, Ralph DJ. Overall satisfaction, sexual function, and the durability of neophallus dimensions following staged female to male genital gender confirming surgery: the Institute of Urology, London U.K. experience. Transl Androl Urol 2014; 3 (02) 156-162
• 8 Danker S, Esmonde N, Berli JU. “Staging” in phalloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2019; 46 (04) 581-590
• 9 Küenzlen L, Nasim S, van Neerven S. et al. Multimodal evaluation of functional nerve regeneration in transgender individuals after phalloplasty with a free radial forearm flap. J Sex Med 2020; 17 (05) 1012-1024
• 10 Wirthmann AE, Majenka P, Kaufmann MC. et al. Phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals by Gottlieb and Levine's free radial forearm flap technique-a long-term single-center experience over more than two decades. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 235-241
• 11 Danker S, Annen AW, Cylinder I, Esmonde NO, Berli JU. Technical Description and Microsurgical Outcomes in Phalloplasty Using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery and Locoregional Veins. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146: 196e-204e
• 12 Chen ML, Safa B. Single-stage phalloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2019; 46 (04) 567-580
• 13 Biemer E. Penile construction by the radial arm flap. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15 (03) 425-430
• 14 Chang TS, Hwang WY. Forearm flap in one-stage reconstruction of the penis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (02) 251-258
• 15 Morrison SD, Perez MG, Carter CK, Crane CN. Pre- and post-operative care with associated intra-operative techniques for phalloplasty in female-to-male patients. Urol Nurs 2015; 35 (03) 134-138
• 16 Xu KY, Watt AJ. The pedicled anterolateral thigh phalloplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (03) 399-406
• 17 Esmonde N, Bluebond-Langner R, Berli JU. Phalloplasty flap-related complication. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (03) 415-424
• 18 Heston AL, Esmonde NO, Dugi III DD, Berli JU. Phalloplasty: techniques and outcomes. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8 (03) 254-265
• 19 Inoue Y, Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the forearm: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (02) 195-210
• 20 Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW. The functional angiosome: clinical implications of the anatomical concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (04) 721-733
• 21 De Wolf E, Claes K, Sommeling CE. et al. Free bipedicled radial forearm and posterior interosseous artery perforator flap phalloplasty. J Sex Med 2019; 16 (07) 1111-1117
• 22 Luenam S, Prugsawan K, Kosiyatrakul A, Chotanaphuti T, Sriya P. Neural anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap. J Hand Microsurg 2015; 7 (01) 49-54
• 23 Garaffa G, Ralph DJ, Christopher N. Total urethral construction with the radial artery-based forearm free flap in the transsexual. BJU Int 2010; 106 (08) 1206-1210