Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Hospital NICU Level in Washington State

Abstract

Objective Rising maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) rates have drawn increasing public health attention. We evaluated patterns of SMM across the Washington State Perinatal Regional Network, in which neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) levels correlate with maternal level of care.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study using de-identified patient and hospital-level rates of SMM diagnoses and procedures for all women who delivered at 58 hospitals from October 2015 to September 2016. Data were obtained from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System, which includes inpatient diagnosis with associated Present on Admission flags, procedure, and discharge information derived from hospital billing systems. Deliveries were stratified by having or not having SMM. For each SMM diagnosis, POA rates were tabulated. Hospital SMM rates (all SMM, transfusion only, and SMM excluding transfusion) were grouped according to their NICU level of care (critical access [CA] and 1–4). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results Of 76,961 deliveries, 908 women (1.2%) had any SMM including 533 with transfusion only and 375 with all other SMM diagnoses/procedures. Rates of SMM were highest at level 1 and level 4 hospitals at 1.3 and 1.5%, respectively. Level 1 and CA hospitals had the highest transfusion rate (1.0%), while level 2, 3, and 4 hospitals had progressively lower rates (0.8, 0.7, and 0.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). Level 4 hospitals had the highest rate of SMM diagnoses/procedures (1.0%). Among SMM diagnoses, the percentage with POA was lowest in level 1/CA hospitals (23%) and similar across level 2, 3, and 4 hospitals (39%).

Conclusion SMM diagnoses occur most frequently at the centers providing the highest level of care, likely attributable to the regional referral system. However, transfusion rates are increased in level 1/CA hospitals. Efforts to decrease SMM should focus on equipping level 1/CA hospitals with tools to decrease maternal morbidity and improve referral systems.

Key Points

• SMM occurs most frequently at highest level of care.

• Higher transfusion rates occur at lower care level hospitals.

• Most SMM POA occurs at higher level of care.

Keywords

regional referral - present on admission - maternal morbidity - quality improvement

Publication History

Received: 10 November 2020

Accepted: 17 June 2021

Article published online:
16 July 2021

• References

• 1 MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Cabral H, Morton C. Recent increases in the U.S. maternal mortality rate: disentangling trends from measurement issues. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 447-455
• 2 Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe maternal morbidity in the United States. Accessed 25 May 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/severematernalmorbidity.html
• 3 Council on Patient Safety in Women's Healthcare. Severe maternal morbidity review – AIM. Accessed October 9, 2019 at: https://safehealthcareforeverywoman.org/patient-safety-tools/severe-maternal-morbidity-review/#link_acc-1-5-d
• 4 Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review. Obstetric care consensus no. 5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e54-e60
• 5 Levels of maternal care. Obstetric care consensus no. 9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134: e41-e55
• 6 Health WSDO. Washington State Perinatal and Neonatal Level of Care (LOC). 2018 Guidelines. Accessed April 2018 at: https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/Pubs/950154.pdf
• 7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Severe maternal morbidity indicators and corresponding ICD codes during delivery hospitalizations. Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Accessed October 18, 2019 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/smm/severe-morbidity-ICD.htm
• 8 Snow CL, Holtzman L, Waters H. et al. Research Triangle Institute, accuracy of coding in the hospital-acquired conditions-present on admission program final report, June 30, 2012. Accessed November 19, 2019 at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAcqCond/Downloads/Accuracy-of-coding-Final-Report.pdf
• 9 Bateman BT, Robinson JN. Getting risk prediction right. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (03) 437-439
• 10 Coffey R, Milenkovic M, Andrews RM. The case for the present-on-admission (POA) indicator. 2006 HCUP methods series report # 2006–01 online. June 26, 2006. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed November 17, 2019 at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2006_1.pdf
• 11 CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program Fiscal Year. 2020 Fact Sheet. Accessed November 19, 2019 at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Downloads/HAC-Reduction-Program-Fact-Sheet.pdf
• 12 Easter SR, Robinson JN, Menard MK. et al. Potential effects of regionalized maternity care on U.S. hospitals. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (03) 545-552
• 13 Council on Patient Safety in Women's Healthcare. Patient safety bundles – AIM. Accessed November 9, 2020 at: https://safehealthcareforeverywoman.org/council/patient-safety-bundles/maternal-safety-bundles/
• 14 California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. QI initiatives. Accessed November 9, 2020 at: https://www.cmqcc.org/qi-initiatives/