Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2021; 10(01): 014-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732770
Original Article

Trends in Resin Composite Restoration Repair Teaching in Dental Colleges in Pakistan

Muhammad Amber Fareed 
1   Adult Restorative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Oman Dental College, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
,
Anam Fayyaz Bashir
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Usman Yousaf
3   Department of Orthodontics, University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University Of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Qaiser Ali Baig
4   Department of Community Dentistry, Dow International Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Ussamah Waheed Jatala
5   Department of Prosthodontics, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Muhammad Sohail Zafar
6   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations Funding This research received no external funding.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The paradigm shift from replacement to repair of defective resin composite restorations to implement minimal intervention approaches has been popular. Therefore, the teaching of composite repair strategies is included in contemporary dental curricula across the globe.

Methods A validated 18-item questionnaire pertaining to existing educational practices related to the teaching of defective composite restorations repair was acquired form dental colleges in Pakistan.

Results The response rate was 63% and the majority of dental colleges (67%) reported that they have included the teaching of composite restorations repair in the curricula, where four colleges (33%) implemented only didactic teaching and eight colleges (66%) reported a combination of didactic teaching and clinical training. The composite repair indications taught included tooth substance conservation 100% (12), reduced cost to patient 84.3% (10) and dentist 100% (12), reduced iatrogenic pulpal damage 100% (12), and reduced chair side treatment time 91.3% (11), restoration-related defects (66% preferred repair), anterior tooth fracture from incisal/proximal margin (80% teach repair), and in case of posterior tooth cusp fracture (20% teach repair). Our results revealed that the choice of mechanical and adhesive substrate surface conditioning depended on case selection.

Conclusion The teaching of defective composite restorations repair was less widespread and certain variations in teaching were identified. Nearly all dental colleges reported to incorporate current evidence of minimum invasive strategies of composite repair in curricula in future.

Keywords

composite repair - defective restoration - minimally invasive dentistry - teaching


Publication History

Article published online:
11 August 2021

© 2021. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142 (06) 612-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kanzow P, Wiegand A. Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (01) 108-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Opdam NJM, Collares K, Hickel R. et al. Clinical studies in restorative dentistry: new directions and new demands. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ritter AV, Lee W, Boushell RW. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th edition. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier 2019
  • 5 Blum IR, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in teaching programmes in United Kingdom and Irish Dental Schools. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002; 10 (04) 151-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Teaching of direct composite restoration repair in undergraduate dental schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Dent Educ 2012; 16 (01) e53-e58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Blum IR, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. The repair of direct composite restorations: an international survey of the teaching of operative techniques and materials. Eur J Dent Educ 2003; 7 (01) 41-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Blum IR, Wilson N. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134 (03) 317-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lynch CD, Blum IR, Frazier KB, Haisch LD, Wilson NHF. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2012; 143 (02) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Blum IR, Mjör IA, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Wilson NHF. Defective direct composite restorations–replace or repair? A survey of teaching in Scandinavian dental schools. Swed Dent J 2003; 27 (03) 99-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39 (03) 210-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, Blum IR. Contemporary teaching of restoration repair at dental schools in Germany - close to universality and consistency. J Dent 2018; 75: 121-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Blum IR, Lynch CD, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Wilson NHF. Repair versus replacement of defective composite restorations in dental schools in Germany. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2011; 19 (02) 56-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tovo CB, de Castilhos ED, Rodrigues-Junior SA. Repair of composite restorations - teaching information from dental schools of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil.. RFO, Passo Fundo 2011; 16 (03) 301-306 DOI: 10.5335/rfo.v16i3.1000.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hasan M, Khan F, Rahman M. Teaching and practice of repair of resin composite restorations in dental institutions of Karachi. JPDA 2011; 20: 216-221
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lynch CD, Hayashi M, Seow LL, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. The management of defective resin composite restorations: current trends in dental school teaching in Japan. Oper Dent 2013; 38 (05) 497-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brunton PA, Ghazali A, Tarif ZH. et al. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania. J Dent 2017; 59: 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Göstemeyer G, Schwendicke F. Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. J Dent 2018; 69: 1-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MCDNJ, Opdam NJM. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - a practice based study. J Dent 2017; 64: 30-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fayyaz A, Fareed MA, Ehsan S, Baig QA, Noor NA. Repair or replacement of defective direct composite restorations: a survey of dentists. J Pak Dent Assoc 2015; 24: 17-21
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P. et al. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43 (02) 279-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kanzow P, Wiegand A. Teaching of composite restoration repair: trends and quality of teaching over the past 20 years. J Dent 2020; 95: 103303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Blum IR. Restoration repair as a contemporary approach to tooth preservation: criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Prim Dent J 2019; 8 (01) 38-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations–criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (01) 28-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fdi World Dental Federation. Repair of restorations: adopted by the General Assembly: September 2019, San Francisco, United States of America. Int Dent J 2020; 70 (01) 7-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar