Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2021; 10(01): 030-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732776
Original Article

Effect of Different Adhesion Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems to Sound and Artificial Caries-Affected Dentin

Omnia M. Sami
1   Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Essam A. Naguib
1   Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Rasha H. Afifi
1   Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Shaymaa M. Nagi
2   Oral and Dental Research Division, Restorative and Dental Materials Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
› Author Affiliations Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Bonding to different dentin substrates influences resin composite restoration outcomes. This study investigated the influence of different adhesion protocols on the shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems to sound and artificial caries-affected dentin (CAD).

Materials and Methods Occlusal enamel of 80 premolars were wet grinded to obtain flat midcoronal dentin. Specimens were equally divided according to the substrate condition: sound and CAD by subjecting to pH-cycling for 14 days. Each dentin substrate was bonded with the adhesive systems used in this study: Single Bond universal adhesive or Prime&Bond universal (applied either in etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesion protocol). Adhesive systems were utilized according to manufacturers’ instructions, then resin composite was built up. Specimens were tested for shear bond strength. The data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance, and failure modes were determined using stereomicroscope.

Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two tested adhesive systems on artificially created CAD with different adhesion protocols. On sound dentin, Single Bond universal, either in the etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesion protocols, revealed higher statistically significant shear bond strength mean values compared with CAD.

Conclusion Single Bond universal adhesive in an etch-and-rinse adhesion protocol improved only bonding to sound dentin, while no added positive effect for the etching step with Prime&Bond universal adhesive was found when bonded to both sound and CAD substrates. The influence of CAD on the performance of the universal adhesives was material-dependent.

Keywords

caries-affected dentin - microshear - multimode - universal dental adhesives - adhesion protocols


Publication History

Article published online:
11 August 2021

© 2021. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Costa AR, Garcia-Godoy F, Correr-Sobrinho L. et al. Influence of different dentin substrate (caries-affected, caries-infected, sound) on long-term μTBS. Braz Dent J 2017; 28 (01) 16-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J. et al. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81 (08) 556-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8 (01) 1-17
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Shibata S, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN. et al. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives on normal and caries-affected dentin. Dent Mater J 2016; 35 (02) 166-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Nagi SM. Durability of solvent-free one-step self-etch adhesive under simulated intrapulpal pressure. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7 (04) e466-e470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Rocha RO. The bonding performance of a universal adhesive to artificially-created caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19 (04) 317-321
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Shadman N, Farzin-Ebrahimi S, Mortazavi-Lahijani E, Ghaderi A. Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to normal and caries-affected dentin. Journal OHOE 2015; 4: 87-93
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C. et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 2004; 83 (03) 216-221
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of universal dental adhesives. J Clin. Exp 2017; 9: 892-896
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Isolan CP, Valente LL, Münchow EA. et al. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Appl Adhes Sci 2014; 2: 25-35
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Soares FZM. Influence of water storage on bond strength of multimode adhesive systems to artificially induced caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 92-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Joves GJ, Inoue G, Nakashima S, Sadr A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Mineral density, morphology and bond strength of natural versus artificial caries-affected dentin. Dent Mater J 2013; 32 (01) 138-143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Drobac M, Stojanac I, Ramić B, Premović M, Petrović L. Shear bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentin of simplified “etch-and-rinse” and “self-etch” adhesives and the hybrid layer micromorphology. Vojnosanit Pregl 2019; 76: 675-683
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL. Rocha RO, Maxnuck Soares FZ. The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives. J Conserv Dent 2018; 21 (02) 136-141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Müller C, Teixeira GS, Krejci I, Bortolotto T, Susin AH. Effect of caries-affected dentin on one-step universal and multi-step etch-and-rinse adhesives’ bond strength. Rev Odontol UNESP 2017; 46: 273-277
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Ghajari MF, Ghasemi A, Badiee M, Abdolazimi Z, Baghban AA. Microshear bond strength of scotchbond universal adhesive to primary and permanent dentin. Front Dent 2019; 16 (03) 173-180
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA. et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci 2019; 61 (04) 549-553
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Goud KM, Arun J, Nishanth P, Deepak BS, Nandini TN. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three dental adhesives under dry and wet bonding conditions. J Int Oral Health 2016; 8: 267-271
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ahmed AA, Hassan MM, Abdalla AI. Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin used in total-etch and self-etch modes. Tanta Dent. J 2019; 15: 91-98
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Montagner AF, Carvalho MP, Susin AH. Microshear bonding effectiveness of different dentin regions. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26 (02) 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43 (07) 765-776
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T. et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40 (06) 475-484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Razmjouei F, Soltani M. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy characteristics of universal adhesive in primary tooth dentin: an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018; 15 (04) 264-270
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar