The Journal of Knee Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Knee Surg 2023; 36(04): 345-353
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733882

Original Article

Does the Addition of iPACK Block to Adductor Canal Block Provide Improved Analgesic Effect in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jou-Hua Wang

¹Department of Orthopedics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

,

Hsuan-Hsiao Ma

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

,

Te-Feng Arthur Chou

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

,

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

,

Cheng-Fong Chen

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

,

Po-Kuei Wu

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

,

Wei-Ming Chen

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (iPACK) block was proposed in recent years to relieve posterior knee pain. Since adductor canal block (ACB) and iPACK involve different branches of the sensory nerves, it is theoretically feasible to combine iPACK block and ACB to relief pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aim to validate the efficacy of adding iPACK block to ACB in the setting of a multimodal pain management protocol following TKA. A comprehensive literature review on Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed was performed. Eight studies (N = 1,056) that compared the efficacy of iPACK block + ACB with ACB alone were included. Primary outcomes consisted of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at rest or during activity at various time points. Secondary outcomes include opioids consumption, walking distance, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Compared to ACB alone, VAS scores at rest (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –2.05 to –0.30) and during activity (SMD: –0.26; 95% CI: –0.49 to –0.03) on the day of surgery were lower in the iPACK block + ACB group. However, the difference did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Opioids consumption at postoperative 24 hours was lower in the iPACK + ACB group (SMD: –0.295; 95% CI: –0.543 to –0.048). VAS score on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2, opioids consumption from 24 to 48 hours, walking distance, and LOS were not different. In conclusion, the addition of iPACK block to ACB in a multimodal pain management protocol can effectively reduce opioids consumption in the early postoperative period. This is a level III, meta-analysis study.

Keywords

Keywords

adductor canal block - analgesia - iPACK block - multimodal - nerve block - pain - total knee arthroplasty

References
1 Sah AP, Liang K, Sclafani JA. Optimal multimodal analgesia treatment recommendations for total joint arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2018; 6 (06) e7
2 Lamplot JD, Wagner ER, Manning DW. Multimodal pain management in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (02) 329-334
3 Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Cozowicz C, Zubizarreta N, Ozbek U, Mazumdar M. The impact of peripheral nerve blocks on perioperative outcome in hip and knee arthroplasty-a population-based study. Pain 2016; 157 (10) 2341-2349
4 Jæger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS. et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38 (06) 526-532
5 Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC. et al. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38 (04) 321-325
6 Horn JL, Pitsch T, Salinas F, Benninger B. Anatomic basis to the ultrasound-guided approach for saphenous nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34 (05) 486-489
7 Abdallah FW, Chan VW, Gandhi R, Koshkin A, Abbas S, Brull R. The analgesic effects of proximal, distal, or no sciatic nerve block on posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2014; 121 (06) 1302-1310
8 Kampitak W, Tansatit T, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S. Optimal location of local anesthetic injection in the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) for posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical and clinical study. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72 (05) 486-494
9 Tran J, Giron Arango L, Peng P, Sinha SK, Agur A, Chan V. Evaluation of the iPACK block injectate spread: a cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; rapm-2018-100355
10 Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Gurava Reddy AV. Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28 (07) 1391-1395
11 VanderWielen BA, Fitzsimmons AJ, Kovacs AJ, Topolski MS. Community hospital implementation of the IPACK block reduces opioid use and length of stay after total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth 2020; 65: 109857
12 Li D, Alqwbani M, Wang Q, Liao R, Yang J, Kang P. Efficacy of adductor canal block combined with additional analgesic methods for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (12) 3554-3562
13 Patterson ME, Vitter J, Bland K, Nossaman BD, Thomas LC, Chimento GF. The effect of the IPACK block on pain after primary TKA: a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (6S): S173-S177
14 Vichainarong C, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S, Songborassamee N. Analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45 (11) 872-879
15 Kandarian B, Indelli PF, Sinha S. et al. Implementation of the IPACK (Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) block into a multimodal analgesic pathway for total knee replacement. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72 (03) 238-244
16 Biehl M, Wild L, Waldman K, Haq F, Easteal RA, Sawhney M. The safety and efficacy of the IPACK block in primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective chart review. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67 (09) 1271-1273
17 Ochroch J, Qi V, Badiola I. et al. Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to a multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45 (10) 799-804
18 Tak R, Gurava Reddy AV, Jhakotia K, Karumuri K, Sankineani SR. Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 106 (02) 155-162
19 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
20 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25 (09) 603-605
21 Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2013; 118 (02) 409-415
22 Danoff JR, Goel R, Sutton R, Maltenfort MG, Austin MS. How much pain is significant? Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the Visual Analog Scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (7S): S71-75.e2
23 Wang C, Chen Z, Ma X. Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2019; 72: 16-24
24 Szczukowski Jr MJ, Hines JA, Snell JA, Sisca TS. Femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty patients: a method to control postoperative pain. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (06) 720-725
25 Shah NA, Jain NP, Panchal KA. Adductor canal blockade following total knee arthroplasty-continuous or single shot technique? Role in postoperative analgesia, ambulation ability and early functional recovery: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (08) 1476-1481
26 Keijsers R, van Delft R, van den Bekerom MP, de Vries DC, Brohet RM, Nolte PA. Local infiltration analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: effect on post-operative pain and opioid consumption–a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (07) 1956-1963
27 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF. et al; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41 (06) 1073-1093

Zusatzmaterial

Supplementary Material