RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735299
Concordance Between Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Abnormal Vaginal Discharge in Chilean Women
Concordância entre o diagnóstico clínico e laboratorial de corrimento vaginal anormal em mulheres chilenasAbstract
Objective To determine the concordance between the clinical diagnosis of women with abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) and laboratory results using molecular detection and observation of the vaginal microbiota.
Methods Cross-sectional study conducted in 2018 in Temuco, Chile. A total of 25 midwives from 12 health centers participated. A total of 125 women > 18 years old, volunteers, were recruited. The sample of the posterior vaginal fornix was obtained by speculoscopy. Characteristics of the discharge and of the external and internal genitalia were observed. Gram staining was used to observe vaginal microbiota, blastoconidia and pseudohyphae, and polymerase chain reaction was used for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans. The Cohen kappa coefficient was used in the concordance analysis.
Results Out of a total of 125 women with AVD, 85.6% consulted spontaneously and 14.4% were diagnosed clinically during a routine check-up. Absolute concordance was significant (p = 0.0012), with an agreement of 13.6%. The relative concordance was significant, but fair for bacterial vaginosis (Kappa = 0.21; p = 0.003) and candidiasis (Kappa = 0.22; p = 0.001), and slight for trichomoniasis (Kappa = 0.14; p = 0.009). The percentage of coincidence of the diagnoses (single or mixed) by laboratory and midwives was: bacterial vaginosis 63.2% (12/19), candidiasis 36.5% (27/74), and trichomoniasis 12.5% (4/32). There was 20% coinfection. A total of 36% of the clinical diagnoses of AVD had negative laboratory tests.
Conclusion The vulvovaginitis conditions candidiasis and trichomoniasis appear to be overdiagnosed, and bacterial vaginosis appears to be underdiagnosed by the clinical diagnosis when compared with the laboratory diagnosis. The low concordance obtained shows the importance of complementing the clinical diagnosis with a laboratory study of AVD, particularly in women with failed treatments and/or coinfections with unspecific and varying signs and symptoms.
Resumo
Objetivo Determinar a concordância entre o diagnóstico clínico de mulheres com corrimento vaginal anormal (AVD) e os resultados laboratoriais por meio da detecção molecular e observação da microbiota vaginal.
Métodos Estudo transversal realizado em 2018 em Temuco, Chile. Participaram 25 parteiras de 12 centros de saúde. Um total de 125 mulheres > 18 anos, voluntárias, foram recrutadas. A amostra do fórnice vaginal posterior foi obtida por especuloscopia. Foram observadas características da secreção e da genitália externa e interna. A coloração de Gram foi usada para observar a microbiota vaginal, blastoconídios e pseudo-hifas, e a reação em cadeia da polimerase foi usada para a detecção de Trichomonas vaginalis e Candida albicans. O coeficiente kappa de Cohen foi usado na análise de concordância.
Resultados De um total de 125 mulheres com AVD, 85,6% consultaram espontaneamente e 14,4% foram diagnosticados clinicamente durante um check-up de rotina. A concordância absoluta foi significativa (p = 0,0012), com concordância de 13,6%. A concordância relativa foi significativa, mas razoável para vaginose bacteriana (Kappa = 0,21; p = 0,003) e candidíase (Kappa = 0,22; p = 0,001), e leve para tricomoníase (Kappa = 0,14; p = 0,009). O percentual de coincidência dos diagnósticos (solteiros ou mistos) por laboratório e parteiras foi: vaginose bacteriana 63,2% (12/19), candidíase 36,5% (27/74) e tricomoníase 12,5% (4/32). Houve 20% de coinfecção. Um total de 36% dos diagnósticos clínicos de AVD tiveram exames laboratoriais negativos.
Conclusão As condições de vulvovaginite candidíase e tricomoníase parecem ser sobrediagnosticadas, e a vaginose bacteriana parece ser subdiagnosticada pelo diagnóstico clínico quando comparado com o diagnóstico laboratorial. A baixa concordância obtida mostra a importância de complementar o diagnóstico clínico com estudo laboratorial de AVD, principalmente em mulheres com falha de tratamento e / ou coinfecções com sinais e sintomas inespecíficos e variáveis.
Keywords
vaginal discharge - laboratory diagnosis - bacterial vaginosis - candidiasis - trichomonas vaginalisPalavras-chave
corrimento vaginal - diagnóstico laboratorial - vaginose bacteriana - candidíase - trichomonas vaginalisContributors
All the authors contributed with the project and data interpretation, the writing of the article, the critical review of the intellectual content, and with the final approval of the version to be published.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 11. Mai 2020
Angenommen: 02. August 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. September 2021
© 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Ministerio de Salud. Política Nacional de Salud Sexual y Salud Reproductiva [Internet]. Santiago: MINSAL; 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: https://diprece.minsal.cl/wrdprss_minsal/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/POLITICA-NACIONAL-DE-SALUD-SEXUAL-Y-REPRODUCTIVA-.pdf
- 2 World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections [Internet]. Feb 2004 [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/en/STIGuidelines2003.pdf
- 3 Gannoni G, Bórquez S. Vulvovaginitis e infecciones de transmisión sexual en la adolescencia. Rev Med Clin Las Condes 2011; 22 (01) 49-57 DOI: 10.1016/S0716-8640(11)70392-3.
- 4 Villaseca R, Ovalle A, Amaya F, Labra B, Escalona N, Lizana P. et al. Infecciones vaginales en un Centro de Salud Familiar de la Región Metropolitana, Chile. Rev Chilena Infectol 2015; 32 (01) 30-36 DOI: 10.4067/S0716-10182015000200005.
- 5 Departamento de Salud Municipalidad de Temuco. Plan de salud municipal [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.saludmunicipaltemuco.cl/documentos/Docs/plasam2019.pdf
- 6 Reiter S, Kellogg Spadt S. Bacterial vaginosis: a primer for clinicians. Postgrad Med 2019; 131 (01) 8-18 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1546534.
- 7 Zhu YX, Li T, Fan SR, Liu XP, Liang YH, Liu P. Health-related quality of life as measured with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016; 14: 65 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0470-2.
- 8 Jennings LK, Krywko DM. Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/NBK/NBK499959
- 9 Rein MF. Trichomoniasis. In: Ryan ET, Hill DR, Solomon T, Aronson NE, Endy TP. eds. Hunter's tropical medicine and emerging infectious diseases. 10th ed.. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2020: 731-733
- 10 Sehar N, Ansari KB. Concept and management of leucorrhoea in Unani System of Medicine. IOSR J Pharm 2016; 6 (06) 36-40 . [cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: http://www.iosrphr.org/papers/v6i6/G0663640.pdf
- 11 Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G, Mendling W, Jensen JS. 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against sexually transmitted infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS 2018; 29 (13) 1258-1272 DOI: 10.1177/0956462418785451.
- 12 Poojari VG, Vasudeva A, Dawson S, Kaipa G, Eshwara V, Tellapragada C. et al. Diagnosis of lower genital tract infection in pregnancy: routine midtrimester highvaginal swab followed by gram staining, seems to be the best strategy. CurrWomens Health Rev 2019; 15 (04) 277-38 . [Cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.eurekaselect.com/172414/article?trendmd-shared=3
- 13 Barry MS, Ba Diallo A, Diadhiou M, Mall I, Gassama O, Guèye MDN. et al. Accuracy of syndromic management in targeting vaginal and cervical infections among symptomatic women of reproductive age attending primary care clinics in Dakar, Senegal. Trop Med Int Health 2018; 23 (05) 541-548 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13046.
- 14 Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29 (02) 297-301 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991.
- 15 Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia. Informe Desarrollo Social [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: http://www.desarrollosocialyfamilia.gob.cl/storage/docs/Informe_de_Desarrollo_Social_2019.pdf
- 16 Santos Fonseca RS, Casado Méndez PR, Méndez Jiménez O, Martínez Méndez V, Jiménez Almaguer D, Cordoví Álvarez LC. Effectiveness of the Nugent Score System in the diagnosis to bacterial vaginosis. Rev AMC 2017; 21 (06) 729-739 . Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1025-02552017000600006&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
- 17 Das P, Swain T, Mohanty JR, Sinha S, Padhi B, Torondel B. et al. Higher vaginal pH in Trichomonas vaginalis infection with intermediate Nugent score in reproductive-age women-a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Odisha, India. Parasitol Res 2018; 117 (09) 2735-2742 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-018-5962-z.
- 18 Burgener-Kairuz P, Zuber JP, Jaunin P, Buchman TG, Bille J, Rossier M. Rapid detection and identification of Candida albicans and Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata in clinical specimens by species-specific nested PCR amplification of a cytochrome P-450 lanosterol-α-demethylase (L1A1) gene fragment. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32 (08) 1902-1907 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1902-1907.1994.
- 19 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
- 20 Chauhan V, Shah M, Thakkar S, Patel SV, Marfatia Y. Sexually transmitted infections in women: A correlation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis in cases of vaginal discharge syndrome. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014; 5 (Suppl. 01) S1-S5 DOI: 10.4103/2229-5178.144498.
- 21 Sonkar SC, Wasnik K, Kumar A, Mittal P, Saluja D. Comparative analysis of syndromic and PCR-based diagnostic assay reveals misdiagnosis/ overtreatment for trichomoniasis based on subjective judgment in symptomatic patients. Infect Dis Poverty 2016; 5: 42 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-016-0133-x.
- 22 Tellapragada C, Eshwara VK, Bhat P, Kamath A, Aletty S, Mukhopadhyay C. Screening of vulvovaginal infections during pregnancy in resource constrained settings: Implications on preterm delivery. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10 (04) 431-437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.06.003.
- 23 Rao VL, Mahmood T. Vaginal discharge. Obstetrics, Gynaecol Reprod Med 2020; 30 (01) 11-18 . [cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1751721419302064
- 24 Paladine HL, Desai UA. Vaginitis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician 2018; 97 (05) 321-329 https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0301/p321.pdf
- 25 Lillis RA, Martin DH, Nsuami MJ. Mycoplasma genitalium infections in women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic in New Orleans. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 69 (03) 459-465 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy922.
- 26 Munson E. Molecular diagnostics update for the emerging (if not already widespread) sexually transmitted infection agent Mycoplasma genitalium: just about ready for prime time. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 55 (10) 2894-2902 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.
- 27 Taylor-Robinson D. Mollicutes in vaginal microbiology: Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma genitalium. Res Microbiol 2017; 168 (9-10): 875-881 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.02.009.
- 28 Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida Species. Front Microbiol 2017; 7: 2173 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173.
- 29 Bautista CT, Wurapa EK, Sateren WB, Morris SM, Hollingsworth BP, Sanchez JL. Association of bacterial vaginosis with chlamydia and gonorrhea among women in the US Army. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52 (05) 632-639 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.0.
- 30 Hu Z, Zhou W, Mu L, Kuang L, Su M, Jiang Y. Identification of cytolytic vaginosis versus vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2015; 19 (02) 152-155 DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000076.
- 31 Xu H, Zhang X, Yao W, Sun Y, Zhang Y. Characterization of the vaginal microbiome during cytolytic vaginosis using high-throughput sequencing. J Clin Lab Anal 2019; 33 (01) e22653 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22653.
- 32 Ventolini G, Schrader C, Mitchell E. Vaginal lactobacillosis. J Clin Gynecol Obstet 2014; 3 (03) 81-84 . [cited 2020 Mar 5]. Available from: https://jcgo.org/index.php/jcgo/article/view/294
- 33 Donders GGG, Bellen G, Grinceviciene S, Ruban K, Vieira-Baptista P. Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res Microbiol 2017; 168 (9-10): 845-858 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.004.