Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735580
Single Ophthalmology Program Trends in Resident Surgical and Research Productivity by Gender, Underrepresented Minority Status, and Welcoming a Child
Funding This study was supported in part by the NEI P30 EY002162—Core Grant for Vision Research and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY. The authors have no additional financial disclosures.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033285/202102/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0041-1735580_292ra-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to identify differences for cataract surgery, total procedural volume, and publication rates between residents by gender, underrepresented minority (URM) status, and welcoming a child during ophthalmology residency.
Design This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study.
Participants A total of 89 residents graduating from 2002 to 2020 at a single program were included.
Methods A multiple linear regression model was created to determine factors predictive of the number of cataract surgeries performed as the primary surgeon, total procedural volume, number of publications, or first author publications. Independent variables included resident gender, URM status, PhD degree, welcoming a child during residency, and graduation year.
Results Of the 89 graduating residents included in this study, identifying as female (45 women, 50.6%) and as URM (eight identifying as URM, 9.0%) was not associated with a difference in surgical or research volume. Female residents performed a mean (SD) of 240.1 (55.1) cataract surgeries while male residents performed 210.6 (46.1) cataract surgeries. Residents identifying as URM completed 228.1 (41.9), while non-URM residents completed 234.8 (51.9) cataract surgeries. Since 2008, eight female residents (22.2%) and two male residents (6.9%) added children to their families. Welcoming a child to the family was also not associated with decreased surgical or publication volume. Number of cataract surgeries, total procedures, and number of publications did increase over time (p <0.001), as each graduation year was associated with 5.4 (95% CI: 3.9, 7.1) more cataract surgeries and 30.5 (95% CI: 25.7, 36.9) more procedures. Each year was also associated with 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.38) more publications and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.28) more first author publications.
Conclusion Surgical and research productivity has increased, and female residents and residents who identify as URM did not have fewer cataract surgeries or procedures. Welcoming a child also did not correlate with differences in surgical or procedural volume. Programs should continue to promote equitable surgery and procedural distributions as well as identify more targeted strategies to encourage and recruit underrepresented medical students into ophthalmology.
Keywords
ophthalmology - surgical volume - cataract surgery - publication rate - gender - underrepresented minorityPublication History
Received: 17 June 2021
Accepted: 05 August 2021
Article published online:
10 November 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Gong D, Winn BJ, Beal CJ. et al. Gender differences in case volume among ophthalmology residents. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137 (09) 1015-1020
- 2 Reyes-Capo DP, Yannuzzi NA, Chan RVP, Murray TG, Berrocal AM, Sridhar J. Gender differences in self-reported procedural volume among vitreoretinal fellows. Retina 2021; 41 (04) 867-871
- 3 Underrepresented in Medicine Definition. AAMC. Accessed April 26, 2021 at: https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/diversity-inclusion/underrepresented-in-medicine
- 4 Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Wilson MR. Current and future status of diversity in ophthalmologist workforce. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134 (09) 1016-1023
- 5 French DD, Margo CE, Campbell RR, Greenberg PB. Volume of cataract surgery and surgeon gender: the Florida Ambulatory Surgery Center Experience 2005 through 2012. J Med Pract Manage 2016; 31 (05) 297-302
- 6 Feng PW, Ahluwalia A, Adelman RA, Chow JH. Gender differences in surgical volume among cataract surgeons. Ophthalmology 2021; 128 (05) 795-796
- 7 Wang KM, Lee B, Woreta FA. et al. Parental leave policy for ophthalmology residents: results of a nationwide cross-sectional study of program directors. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (03) 785-794
- 8 Valikodath NG, Fausett BV, Oren GA, Whitney K, Woodward MA, Mian SI. Impact of a dedicated research rotation during ophthalmology residency. J Acad Ophthalmol 2017; 9 (01) e1-e6
- 9 Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS One 2018; 13 (11) e0207274
- 10 Nieblas-Bedolla E, Williams JR, Christophers B, Kweon CY, Williams EJ, Jimenez N. Trends in race/ethnicity among applicants and matriculants to US surgical specialties, 2010-2018. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (11) e2023509
- 11 Rojek AE, Khanna R, Yim JWL. et al. Differences in narrative language in evaluations of medical students by gender and under-represented minority status. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (05) 684-691
- 12 Agawu A, Fahl C, Alexis D. et al. The influence of gender and underrepresented minority status on medical student ranking of residency programs. J Natl Med Assoc 2019; 111 (06) 665-673