Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(02): 373-380
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735908
Original Article

Surface Treatment Effect on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement

Siripan Simasetha
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Awiruth Klaisiri
2   Division of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
,
Tool Sriamporn
3   Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand
,
Kraisorn Sappayatosok
4   Department of Oral Diagnostic Science, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand
,
Niyom Thamrongananskul
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Dental Research Fund, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC) and resin cement (RC) using different surface treatments.

Materials and Methods LDGC blocks (Vintage LD Press) were prepared, etched with 4.5% hydrofluoric acid, and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10), depending on the surface treatments. The groups were divided as follows: 1) no surface treatment (control), 2) Silane Primer (KS), 3) Signum Ceramic Bond I (SGI), 4) Signum Ceramic Bond I/Signum Ceramic Bond II (SGI/SGII), 5) experimental silane (EXP), 6) experimental silane/Signum Ceramic Bond II (EXP/SGII), and 7) experimental silane/Adper Scotchbond Multi-purpose Adhesive (EXP/ADP). The specimens were cemented to resin composite blocks with resin cement and stored in water at 37 °C for 24 hours. The specimens underwent 5,000 thermal cycles and were subjected to the SBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under the stereo microscope.

Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed with Welch ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc tests (α = 0.05).

Results The highest mean SBS showed in group EXP/ADP (45.49 ± 3.37 MPa); however, this was not significantly different from group EXP/SGII (41.38 ± 2.17 MPa) (p ≥ 0.05). The lowest SBS was shown in the control group (18.36 ± 0.69 MPa). This was not significantly different from group KS (20.17 ± 1.10 MPa) (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusions The different surface treatments significantly affected the SBS value between LDGC and RC. The application of pure silane coupling agent with or without the application of an adhesive improved the SBS value and bond quality.

Keywords

lithium disilicate - resin cement - silane - shear bond strength


Publication History

Article published online:
17 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98 (05) 389-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 el-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67 (02) 97-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2004; 20 (05) 463-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991; 7 (02) 118-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rojpaibool T, Leevailoj C. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded to enamel or dentin using different resin cement types and film thicknesses. J Prosthodont 2017; 26 (02) 141-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Monteiro Júnior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004; 13 (01) 28-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Menees TS, Lawson NC, Beck PR, Burgess JO. Influence of particle abrasion or hydrofluoric acid etching on lithium disilicate flexural strength. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (05) 1164-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (05) 467-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sundfeld Neto D, Naves LZ, Costa AR. et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the bond strength and morphology of the surface and interface of glass ceramics to a resin cement. Oper Dent 2015; 40 (05) 470-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 std. ISO 29022:2013 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched-edge shear bond strength test; 6.4 Insertion into bonding clamp. International Organization for Standardization; 2013/std
  • 12 std. ISO 4049: 2009 Dentistry-Polymer-based restorative materials; 5.2.2 Film thickness, luting materials. International Organization for Standardization; 2009/std
  • 13 Chaijareenont P, Takahashi H, Nishiyama N, Arksornnukit M. Effects of silane coupling agents and solutions of different polarity on PMMA bonding to alumina. Dent Mater J 2012; 31 (04) 610-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV. Enhanced resin-composite bonding to zirconia framework after pretreatment with selected silane monomers. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (03) 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (07) e147-e162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lee HY, Han GJ, Chang J, Son HH. Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics. Restor Dent Endod 2017; 42 (02) 95-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent 2014; 8 (01) 44-52
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27 (02) 89-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110 (05) 402-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lanza MDS, Vasconcellos WA, Miranda GLPD, Peixoto RTRDC, Lanza LD. Different bonding agents effect on adhesive bond strength: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Rev Odontol UNESP 2020; 49: 1-9
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17 (02) 155-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Zinelis S, Silikas N, Eliades G. Silane reactivity and resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2019; 35 (08) 1082-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89 (03) 268-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent 2015; 40 (04) 372-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2017; 4 (01) 10-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bergoli CD, de Carvalho RF, Luz JN, Luz MS, Meincke DK, Saavedra GdeS. Ceramic repair without hydrofluoric acid. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18 (04) 283-287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002; 18 (02) 179-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Naves LZ, Soares CJ, Moraes RR, Gonçalves LS, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods. Oper Dent 2010; 35 (04) 420-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Abduljabbar T, AlQahtani MA, Jeaidi ZA, Vohra F. Influence of silane and heated silane on the bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics - An in vitro study. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32 (03) 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (01) 13-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar