How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence

Abstract

The “no dose is safe” linear no-threshold (LNT) model forms the basis for radiation safety in radiology practice. This model has its origins in observations of germline mutations in fruit flies exposed to X-rays. After World War II, quantitative risk estimates of radiation injury are primarily derived from the atomic bomb survivor Life Span Study. Current understanding of tissue response to radiation has raised doubts about the validity of LNT model at low doses encountered in the practice of diagnostic radiology. This article traces the evolution of basic radiation safety concepts and provides a bird's eye view of the Life Span Study and other studies which throw light on the matter. The arguments for an alternative, threshold, or even hermetic models of dose response are examined. The relevance of these developments to the nuclear power industry is also outlined.

Keywords

radiation - dose - radiology - safety - history

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Oktober 2021

• References

• 1 Brown P. American martyrs to radiology. Clarence Madison Dally (1865-1904). 1936. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164 (01) 237-239
• 2 Muller HJ. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 1927; 66 (1699): 84-87
• 3 ICRP History Available from. Accessed December 24, 2020 at: https://icrp.org/page.asp?id=210
• 4 Cuttler JM. What becomes of nuclear risk assessment in light of radiation hormesis?. Dose Response 2006; 5 (01) 80-90
• 5 Calabrese EJ, O'Connor MK. Estimating risk of low radiation doses—a critical review of the BEIR VII report and its use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis. Radiat Res 2014; 182 (05) 463-474
• 6 ICRP, 1977. Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 26. 1977 Ann. ICRP 1 (3)
• 7 Douple EB, Mabuchi K, Cullings HM. et al. Long-term radiation-related health effects in a unique human population: lessons learned from the atomic bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2011; 5 (Suppl. 01) S122-S133
• 8 Grant EJ, Brenner A, Sugiyama H. et al. Solid cancer incidence among the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009. Radiat Res 2017; 187 (05) 513-537
• 9 Ozasa K, Grant EJ, Kodama K. Japanese legacy cohorts: the life span study atomic bomb survivor cohort and survivors' offspring. J Epidemiol 2018; 28 (04) 162-169
• 10 Jordan BR. The Hiroshima/Nagasaki survivor studies: discrepancies between results and general perception. Genetics 2016; 203 (04) 1505-1512
• 11 NCR. Health Risks from Exposures to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. National Research Council, Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2006
• 12 Hendee WR, O'Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 2012; 264 (02) 312-321
• 13 Pregnancy and Medical Radiation. ICRP Publication 84. 2000; Ann ICRP;30(1)
• 14 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. 2007 Ann. ICRP 37 (2–4)
• 15 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (22) 2277-2284
• 16 Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ. et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 2011; 258 (03) 889-905
• 17 Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009; 251 (01) 13-22
• 18 Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP. et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380 (9840): 499-505
• 19 McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, Eckel LJ. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90 (10) 1380-1392
• 20 Nair RR, Rajan B, Akiba S. et al. Background radiation and cancer incidence in Kerala, India-Karanagappally cohort study. Health Phys 2009; 96 (01) 55-66
• 21 Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Hum Exp Toxicol 2003; 22 (06) 290-306 , discussion 307, 315–317, 319–323
• 22 Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature 2003; 421 (6924): 691-692
• 23 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). 2008. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Vol. II, Scientific Annex D: Health effects due to radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Accessed December 24, 2020 at: https://www.unsear.org/docs/publications/2008/UNSCEAR_2008_Annexe-D-CORR.pdf
• 24 Wigg DR. Radiation: facts, fallacies and phobias. Australas Radiol 2007; 51 (01) 21-25
• 25 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). 2013 Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. Vol I Scientific AnnexA: levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Accessed December 24, 2020 at: https://www.unsear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annexe_A.pdf
• 26 Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M. et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ 2005; 331 (7508): 77
• 27 Zablotska LB, Lane RS, Thompson PA. A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956-1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data. Br J Cancer 2014; 110 (01) 214-223
• 28 Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D. et al , eds. Dose-Effect Relationships and the Estimation of the Carcinogenic Effects of Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation. Academy of Medicine (Paris) and Academy of Science (Paris) Joint Report No. 2, March 30; 2005
• 29 Kulkarni CB, Pullara SK, Prabhu NK, Patel S, Suresh A, Moorthy S. Comparison of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose⁴) techniques for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinomas using computed tomography. Acad Radiol 2020; S1076-6332 (20) 30483-30489