Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735929
Simplified Guide to MR Elastography in Early Detection of Hepatic Fibrosis with Case Reports
The New Norm in Assessing Liver Health![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00050590/202103/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0041-1735929_2160582-1.jpg)
Abstract
The current unhealthy diets and sedentary lifestyle have led to increase in the prevalence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome globally. Fatty liver is a common occurrence in metabolic syndrome. The liver health is often ignored due to delayed warning signs. Fatty changes of the liver is one of the common findings in ultrasonography. Ultrasound does not detect fibrosis except when cirrhosis is developed. Early stages of fibrosis are asymptomatic with no significant laboratory or preliminary imaging findings. With fibrosis, the elasticity of the liver is reduced and becomes stiffer. Over the years, many techniques have developed to assess the stiffness of the liver, starting from palpation, ultrasonography, and recently developed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). In this article, we have tried to simplify the concepts of MRE to detect fibrosis and present few case reports. The basic steps involved in generating elastograms and interpretation with some insight on how to incorporate it into the clinical workflow are discussed. MRE is superior to various other available techniques and even offers certain advantages over biopsy. MRE is FDA approved for liver fibrosis since 2009, yet it is hardly used in the Indian setting. MRE is a safe and noninvasive technique to evaluate a large volume of the liver and can be a new norm for the evaluation of fatty liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based elastography techniques hold an exciting future in providing mechanical properties of tissues in various organs like spleen, brain, kidney, and heart.
Publication History
Article published online:
06 October 2021
© 2021. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Bedogni G, Nobili V, Tiribelli C. Epidemiology of fatty liver: an update. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (27) 9050-9054
- 2 Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol 2019; 70 (01) 151-171
- 3 Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 2010; 23 (05) 497-511
- 4 Calzadilla Bertot L, Adams LA. The natural course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17 (05) 774
- 5 Serai SD, Obuchowski NA, Venkatesh SK. et al. Repeatability of MR elastography of liver: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2017; 285 (01) 92-100
- 6 Osna NA, Donohue Jr TM, Kharbanda KK. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and current management. Alcohol Res 2017; 38 (02) 147-161
- 7 Marra F, Lotersztajn S. Pathophysiology of NASH: perspectives for a targeted treatment. Curr Pharm Des 2013; 19 (29) 5250-5269
- 8 Xu L, Gao PY. “Palpation by imaging”: magnetic resonance elastography. Chin Med Sci J/Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih 2006; 21 (04) 281-286
- 9 Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castéra L. et al. Quantitative elastography methods in liver disease: current evidence and future directions. Radiology 2018; 286 (03) 738-763
- 10 Guglielmo FF, Venkatesh SK, Mitchell DG, Liver MR. Liver MR elastography technique and image interpretation: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 2019; 39 (07) 1983-2002
- 11 Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM. et al. Elastography in chronic liver disease: modalities, techniques, limitations, and future directions. Radiographics 2016; 36 (07) 1987-2006
- 12 Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37 (03) 544-555
- 13 Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z. et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13 (03) 440-451.e6
- 14 Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ. et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5 (10) 1207-1213.e2
- 15 Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J. et al. Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (03) 553-561
- 16 Rustogi R, Horowitz J, Harmath C. et al. Accuracy of MR elastography and anatomic MR imaging features in the diagnosis of severe hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35 (06) 1356-1364
- 17 Low RN, Hassanein T. MR elastography: validation and reproducibility of measurements of mean liver stiffness and fibrosis. J Hepatol 2012; 56: S415
- 18 Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Lim SG, Wee A. Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Eur Radiol 2014; 24 (01) 70-78
- 19 Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012; 11 (04) 291-297
- 20 Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: clinical applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013; 37 (06) 887-896
- 21 Low G, Kruse SA, Lomas DJ. General review of magnetic resonance elastography. World J Radiol 2016; 8 (01) 59-72
- 22 Leitão HS, Doblas S, Garteiser P. et al. Hepatic fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis: influence on the MR viscoelastic and diffusion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease. Radiology 2017; 283 (01) 98-107
- 23 Barry CT, Mills B, Hah Z. et al. Shear wave dispersion measures liver steatosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38 (02) 175-182
- 24 Shin SU, Lee JM, Yu MH. et al. Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: usefulness of three-dimensional MR elastography with echo-planar imaging technique. Radiology 2014; 272 (01) 143-153
- 25 Low G, Owen NE, Joubert I. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography in the detection of hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (10) 2851-2858
- 26 Reiss-Zimmermann M, Streitberger KJ, Sack I. et al. High-resolution imaging of viscoelastic properties of intracranial tumours by multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Neuroradiol 2015; 25 (04) 371-378
- 27 Siegmann KC, Xydeas T, Sinkus R, Kraemer B, Vogel U, Claussen CD. Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (02) 318-325
- 28 Kolipaka A, Aggarwal SR, McGee KP. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography as a method to estimate myocardial contractility. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36 (01) 120-127
- 29 Jenkyn TR, Ehman RL, An KN. Noninvasive muscle tension measurement using the novel technique of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). J Biomech 2003; 36 (12) 1917-1921
- 30 Jiang X, Asbach P, Streitberger KJ. et al. In vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance elastography of the uterine corpus and cervix. Eur Radiol 2014; 24 (12) 3025-3033
- 31 Shi Y, Glaser KJ, Venkatesh SK, Ben-Abraham EI, Ehman RL. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41 (02) 369-375