Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2021; 10(03): 139-143
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736374
Original Article

Push-Out Bond Strength of Composite Polymerization Methods with Universal Adhesive to Coronal Dentin

Horieh Moosavi
1   Department of Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Fatemeh Rezaei 
2   School of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenova Medical Institute, Moscow, Russia
,
Mohammad Fazli
3   Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Farzaneh Rakhshan 
4   Department of Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was funded by the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, supported the study.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This in vitro study was aimed to determine the effect of composite polymerization methods with universal adhesive on push-out bond strength in coronal dentin.

Materials and Methods Using 48 healthy premolar teeth, the almost conical access cavities were excised to the canal entry. Cavity preparations were treated with a universal adhesive in the self-etch mode. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 12). It was used to restore the cavities with a bulk-fill composite; Tetric N-Ceram, a conventional composite; Filtek Z250, a dual-cure composite; Rebilda DC VOCO, and chemical cure composite; Master-Dent. After applying 10,000 thermal cycles, 1-mm incisions were made in coronal dentin, and slices were placed in a UTM machine in a special jig and tested for push-out bond strength at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Games–Howell tests (p < 0.05).

Results The highest mean bond strength was of the conventional composite (18.36 ± 5.63) and the lowest mean of bond strength was for the dual-cure composite (5.10 ± 2.74). There was a significant difference among the means of bond strength for various composite resins curing (p < 0.001).

Conclusion The bulk-fill and conventional light-cured composites had higher bond strength than self- and dual-cured composite resins.

Keywords

push-out - resin composite - universal adhesive

Note

This study was based on the thesis by Dr. Mohammad Fazli.




Publication History

Article published online:
25 October 2021

© 2021. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Mosharrafian S, Sharifi Z. Comparison of push-out bond strength of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite to intracanal dentin in severely damaged primary anterior teeth. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13 (03) 207-214
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moosavi H, Hariri I, Sadr A, Thitthaweerat S, Tagami J. Effects of curing mode and moisture on nanoindentation mechanical properties and bonding of a self-adhesive resin cement to pulp chamber floor. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (06) 708-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hughes KO, Powell KJ, Hill AE, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Delayed photo activation of dual-cure composites: Effect on cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and mechanical properties. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (02) E97-E104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Caixeta RV, Guiraldo RD, Kaneshima EN. et al. Push-out bond strength of restorations with bulk-fill, flow, and conventional resin composites. ScientificWorldJournal 2015; 2015: 452976 DOI: 10.1155/2015/452976.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Meda EM, Rached RN, Ignácio SA, Fornazari IA, Souza EM. Effect of different adhesive strategies and time on microtensile bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (03) 262-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pereira R, Lima DANL, Giorgi MCC, Marchi GM, Aguiar FHB. Evaluation of bond strength, nanoleakage, and marginal adaptation of bulk-fill composites submitted to thermomechanical aging. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21 (03) 255-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Han SH, Park SH. Incremental and bulk-fill techniques with bulk-fill resin composite in different cavity configurations. Oper Dent 2018; 43 (06) 631-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mandava J, Vegesna DP, Ravi R, Boddeda MR, Uppalapati LV, Ghazanfaruddin MD. Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9 (08) e1023-e1028
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chang J, Platt JA, Yi K, Cochran MA. Quantitative comparison of the water permeable zone among four types of dental adhesives used with a dual-cured composite. Oper Dent 2006; 31 (03) 346-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5 (02) 91-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cavalcanti SC, de Oliveira MT, Arrais CA, Giannini M. The effect of the presence and presentation mode of co-initiators on the microtensile bond strength of dual-cured adhesive systems used in indirect restorations. Oper Dent 2008; 33 (06) 682-689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5 (01) 27-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004; 32 (01) 55-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003; 28 (05) 647-660
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Segreto D, Brandt WC, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S. Influence of irradiance on the push-out bond strength of composite restorations photoactivated by LED. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9 (02) 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar