CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2022; 57(01): 033-040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736514
Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise
Joelho

Resultado funcional do procedimento de tenodese extra-articular lateral (TEL) como complemento à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior: Uma metanálise[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
,
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
,
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
,
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
,
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
,
1   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia
› Institutsangaben

Resumo

Objetivos O objetivo deste estudo é revisar e analisar sistematicamente o desfecho funcional do procedimento de tenodese extra-articular lateral (TEL) em complemento à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (RLCA) em de estudos com alto nível de evidências.

Métodos Realizamos a pesquisa bibliográfica para estudos clínicos comparando o método TEL como complemento à RCLA com a RLCA isolada. Os resultados principais foram a pontuação no Comitê Internacional de Documentação de Joelho (IKDC, na sigla em inglês), pontuação de Lysholm, e falhas no enxerto. Variáveis contínuas foram relatadas, como médias e intervalos de confiança (ICs) de 95%.

Resultados Seis estudos clínicos com 1,049 pacientes foram incluídos na metanálise. O período de seguimento foi de, em média, 24 meses (intervalo de 6–63 meses). A adição do procedimento TEL à reconstrução do LCA resultou em melhor resultado funcional com base no escore IKDC (p < 0,05). A falha do enxerto foi menor no grupo RLCA mais TEL (16 dos 342 pacientes) em comparação com o grupo apenas RLCA (46 dos 341 pacientes) (p < 0,05).

Conclusão Há evidências de alto nível de que o procedimento TEL como complemento à RLCA é preferível em termos de resultado funcional e falha do enxerto.

Divulgação financeira

Sem apoio financeiro.


* Trabalho desenvolvido no Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonésia.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 19. Februar 2021

Angenommen: 15. Juni 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Januar 2022

© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R. et al. STABILITY Study Group. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (02) 285-297
  • 2 Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (01) 5-47
  • 3 Draganich LF, Reider B, Ling M, Samuelson M. An in vitro study of an intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (03) 262-266
  • 4 Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M, Chronik B, Getgood A. A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3186-3195
  • 5 Musahl V, Herbst E, Burnham JM, Fu FH. The Anterolateral Complex and Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26 (08) 261-267
  • 6 Patel RM, Brophy RH. Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomy, Function, Imaging, and Treatment. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (01) 217-223
  • 7 Grassi A, Zicaro JP, Costa-Paz M. et al. ESSKA Arthroscopy Committee. Good mid-term outcomes and low rates of residual rotatory laxity, complications and failures after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (02) 418-431
  • 8 Ra HJ, Kim JH, Lee DH. Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (07) 923-931
  • 9 Hewison CE, Tran MN, Kaniki N, Remtulla A, Bryant D, Getgood AM. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Rotational Laxity When Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (10) 2022-2034
  • 10 Devitt BM, Bell SW, Ardern CL. et al. The Role of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis and Best-Evidence Synthesis. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (10) 2325967117731767
  • 11 Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R. et al. Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back, Neck Group. 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. Spine 2015; 40 (21) 1660-1673
  • 12 Dejour D, Vanconcelos W, Bonin N, Saggin PRF. Comparative study between mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone, double-bundle hamstring and mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone combined with a modified Lemaire extra-articular procedure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (02) 193-199
  • 13 Lemaire M. Rupture ancienne du ligament croisé antérieur du genou. J Chir (Paris) 1967; 93: 311-320
  • 14 Macintosh D, Darby T. Lateral Substitution Reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58: 142
  • 15 Christel P, Djian P. Plastie extra-articulaire antéro-latérale du genou utilisant une ténodèse courte au fascia lata. [Anterio-lateral extra-articular tenodesis of the knee using a short strip of fascia lata]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2002; 88 (05) 508-513
  • 16 Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D. et al. Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy 2020; 36 (06) 1690-1701
  • 17 Ferretti A, Monaco E, Ponzo A. et al. Combined Intra-articular and Extra-articular Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee: 25 Years Later. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2039-2047
  • 18 Trichine F, Alsaati M, Chouteau J, Moyen B, Bouzitouna M, Maza R. Patellar tendon autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without lateral plasty in advanced-stage chronic laxity. A clinical, prospective, randomized, single-blind study using passive dynamic X-rays. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 58-65
  • 19 Castoldi M, Magnussen RA, Gunst S. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: 19-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (07) 1665-1672
  • 20 Tramer JS, Fidai MS, Kadri O. et al. Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Practice Patterns Across the United States. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (12) 2325967118811063
  • 21 Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Monaco E, De Carli A, D'Arrigo C. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and lateral extra-articular reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (11) 2373-2379
  • 22 Spencer L, Burkhart TA, Tran MN. et al. Biomechanical analysis of simulated clinical testing and reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (09) 2189-2197
  • 23 Ueki H, Katagiri H, Otabe K. et al. Contribution of Additional Anterolateral Structure Augmentation to Controlling Pivot Shift in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (09) 2093-2101
  • 24 Slette EL, Mikula JD, Schon JM. et al. Biomechanical Results of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Procedures of the Knee: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (12) 2592-2611
  • 25 Noyes FR, Barber SD. The effect of an extra-articular procedure on allograft reconstructions for chronic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (06) 882-892
  • 26 Roth JH, Kennedy JC, Lockstadt H, McCallum CL, Cunning LA. Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without extra-articular supplementation by transfer of the biceps femoris tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (02) 275-278
  • 27 Oni OO, Crowder E. A comparison of isokinetics and muscle strength ratios following intra-articular and extra-articular reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament. Injury 1996; 27 (03) 195-197