Prediction of Postoperative Day 1 Hemoglobin Level after Cesarean Delivery

Abstract

Objective To create a prediction model for postoperative hemoglobin levels after cesarean delivery, which could reduce routine use of postoperative laboratory test.

Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent cesarean delivery (primary or repeat) at or more than 23 weeks' gestation at a single academic center. The cohort was randomly divided into a training cohort to develop a prediction model and a validation cohort to test the model in a 2:1 ratio. Variables with p-value <0.10 were considered for the mixed multivariable linear regression model in a backward stepwise fashion. We obtained the best cut-off point of the predicted hemoglobin level to detect severe anemia (postoperative hemoglobin level less than 7.0 g/dL) in the training cohort. A receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under a curve was created. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the model in the validation cohort using the best cut-off point obtained in the training cohort as well as postoperative hemoglobin of 10.0 g/dL.

Results Of 2,930 women, 1,954 (66.6%) and 976 (33.3%) were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts. The final model included preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative platelet level, quantitative blood loss, height, weight, magnesium administration, labor, and general anesthesia. The best cut-off to predict severe anemia was predicted hemoglobin level of 8.57 g/dL in the training cohort. Using this cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity in the validation cohort were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56–91%) and 87% (95% CI: 85–89%), respectively. The use of postpartum hemorrhage yielded the sensitivity of 58% (95% CI: 37–77%) and specificity 79% (95% CI: 76–81%), respectively.

Conclusion We developed a validated model to predict the postoperative day 1 hemoglobin levels after cesarean delivery that could assist with identifying women who may not need postoperative laboratory tests.

Key Points

• Postoperative laboratory tests are routine.

• A prediction model may allow reduce routine tests.

• We developed an accurate mathematical model.

Keywords

cesarean delivery - laboratory test - postoperative anemia - prediction

Authors' Contributions

T.K. and H.S. conceived the idea for the study. T.K. wrote the article and is the corresponding author of the study. T.K., H.S., and E.C. contributed to the interpretation of the data. T.K., H.S., A.A., A.T., and E.C. critically revised earlier drafts of the article for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board of MedStar Research Institute approved this study.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. November 2020

Angenommen: 04. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. November 2021

• References

• 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2019; 68 (13) 1-47
• 2 Horowitz E, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Rabinerson D, Feldberg D, Kaplan B. Routine hemoglobin testing following an elective cesarean section: is it necessary?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14 (04) 223-225
• 3 Chamsy DJ, Louie MY, Lum DA, Phelps AL, Mansuria SM. Clinical utility of postoperative hemoglobin level testing following total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (03) 224.e1-224.e7
• 4 Api O, Unal O, Api M. et al. Do asymptomatic patients require routine hemoglobin testing following uneventful, unplanned cesarean sections?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281 (02) 195-199
• 5 Butwick AJ, Walsh EM, Kuzniewicz M, Li SX, Escobar GJ. Patterns and predictors of severe postpartum anemia after cesarean section. Transfusion 2017; 57 (01) 36-44
• 6 Kawakita T, Iqbal SN, Landy HJ, Huang JC, Fries M. Reducing cesarean delivery surgical site infections: a resident-driven quality initiative. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) 282-288
• 7 Allison P. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1999
• 8 Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM. et al. Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA 2016; 316 (19) 2025-2035
• 9 Swenson CW, Lanham MS, Morgan DM, Berger MB. Predicting postoperative day 1 hematocrit levels after uncomplicated hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 130 (01) 19-22
• 10 Lindheimer MD, Katz AI. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Annu Rev Med 1989; 40: 233-250
• 11 Yang JM, Yang YC, Wang KG. Central and peripheral hemodynamics in severe preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75 (02) 120-126
• 12 Naef III RW, Chauhan SP, Chevalier SP, Roberts WE, Meydrech EF, Morrison JC. Prediction of hemorrhage at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83 (06) 923-926
• 13 Andrews WW, Ramin SM, Maberry MC, Shearer V, Black S, Wallace DH. Effect of type of anesthesia on blood loss at elective repeat cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9 (03) 197-200