PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(12): 1367-1372
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739430
Original Article

Cesarean Birth Morbidity among Women with SARS-CoV-2

Rodney McLaren Jr.
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
,
Viktoriya London
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
,
Sujatha Narayanamoorthy
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
,
Fouad Atallah
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
,
Michael Silver
3   Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
,
Howard Minkoff 
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of women with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who underwent cesarean births.

Study Design This was a matched cohort study of pregnant women who had a cesarean birth between March 15, 2020, and May 20, 2020. Cases included women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. For every case, two patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 were matched by maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, primary or repeat cesarean birth, and whether the procedure was scheduled or unscheduled. We compared rates of adverse postcesarean complications (intraoperative bladder or bowel injury, estimated blood loss more than or equal to 1,000 mL, hemoglobin drop more than 3 g/dL, hematocrit drop more than 10%, need for blood transfusion, need for hysterectomy, maternal intensive care unit admission, postoperative fever, and development of surgical site infection), with the primary outcome being a composite of those outcomes. We also assessed duration of postoperative stay. Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the primary outcome between both groups.

Results Between March and May 2020, 202 women who subsequently underwent cesarean birth were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of those 202, 43 (21.3%) patients were positive. They were matched to 86 patients who tested negative. There was no significant difference in the rate of composite adverse surgical outcomes between the groups (SARS-CoV-2 infected 27.9%, SARS-CoV-2 uninfected 25.6%; p = 0.833). There was a higher rate of postoperative fevers (20.9 vs. 5.8%; p = 0.015), but that did not result in a longer length of stay (p = 0.302).

Conclusion Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 who underwent a cesarean birth did not have an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes, other than fever, compared with pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2.

Key Points

  • Women with SARS-CoV-2 had more postoperative fevers.

  • Length of stay did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status.

  • Composite postoperative outcome did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status.

Keywords

cesarean birth - COVID-19 - novel coronavirus - postoperative outcome - SARS-CoV-2

Note

This study was presented as a virtual poster presentation at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's 41st Annual Pregnancy Meeting on January 29, 2021.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. November 2020

Angenommen: 04. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Dashboard. Accessed November 1, 2020 at: https://covid19.who.int
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Accessed November 1, 2020 at: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fcases-updates%2Fcases-in-us.html#cases_casesper100klast7days
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Luthi S. Surgeon General advises hospitals to cancel elective surgeries. Accessed June 17, 2020 at: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/14/surgeon-general-elective-surgeries-coronavirus-129405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Liu WC, Lin CS, Yeh CC. et al. Effect of influenza vaccination against postoperative pneumonia and mortality for geriatric patients receiving major surgery: a nationwide matched study. J Infect Dis 2018; 217 (05) 816-826 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix616.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Li X, Wang X, Li S, Zeng M, Li D. Viral respiratory infection, a risk in pediatric cardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21 (07) e431-e440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 London V, McLaren Jr R, Atallah F. et al. The relationship between status at presentation and outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (10) 991-994
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 London V, McLaren Jr R, Stein J. et al. Caring for pregnant patients with COVID-19: practical tips getting from policy to practice. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (08) 850-853
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Abdelmaseeh TA, Azmat CE, Oliver TI. Postoperative fever. [Updated August 15, 2020]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Smid MC, Vladutiu CJ, Dotters-Katz SK, Boggess KA, Manuck TA, Stamilio DM. Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (06) 614.e1-614.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shea SK, Soper DE. Prevention of cesarean delivery surgical site infections. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2019; 74 (02) 99-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e168-e186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323 (13) 1239-1242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT. et al. Characteristics of women of reproductive age with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by pregnancy status - United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69 (25) 769-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mullins E, Evans D, Viner RM, O'Brien P, Morris E. Coronavirus in pregnancy and delivery: rapid review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55 (05) 586-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yan J, Guo J, Fan C. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women: a report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (01) 111.e1-111.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chen L, Li Q, Zheng D. et al. Clinical characteristics of pregnant women with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (25) e100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Breslin N, Baptiste C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (02) 100118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Della Gatta AN, Rizzo R, Pilu G, Simonazzi G. Coronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy: a systematic review of reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (01) 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lokken EM, Walker CL, Delaney S. et al. Clinical characteristics of 46 pregnant women with a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (06) 911.e1-911.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Juan J, Gil MM, Rong Z, Zhang Y, Yang H, Poon LC. Effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcome: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 (01) 15-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pereira A, Cruz-Melguizo S, Adrien M, Fuentes L, Marin E, Perez-Medina T. Clinical course of coronavirus disease-2019 in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99 (07) 839-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Savasi VM, Parisi F, Patanè L. et al. Clinical findings and disease severity in hospitalized pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pierce-Williams RAM, Burd J, Felder L. et al. Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: a United States cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (03) 100134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fox NS, Melka S. COVID-19 in pregnant women: case series from one large New York City Obstetrical Practice. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (10) 1002-1004
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goldfarb IT, Clapp MA, Soffer MD. et al. Prevalence and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness in symptomatic pregnant and postpartum women stratified by Hispanic ethnicity. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 300-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Andrikopoulou M, Madden N, Wen T. et al. Symptoms and critical illness among obstetric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Khoury R, Bernstein PS, Debolt C. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 241 births to women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at five New York City Medical Centers. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y. et al; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (18) 1708-1720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Martínez-Perez O, Vouga M, Cruz Melguizo S. et al. Association between mode of delivery among pregnant women with COVID-19 and maternal and neonatal outcomes in Spain. JAMA 2020; 324 (03) 296-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Mota Pinto A, Donato H. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Med Port 2019; 32 (03) 219-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kino T, Yamamoto Y, Saigusa Y, Aoki S, Miyagi E. Adverse pregnancy outcomes related to preterm cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 234: 89-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hammad IA, Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Abuhamad AZ. Peripartum complications with cesarean delivery: a review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network publications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27 (05) 463-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (03) 271.e1-271.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Smid MC, Kearney MS, Stamilio DM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean wound complications in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32 (14) 1336-1341
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (04) 299-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (01) 156-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar