CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(04): 820-827
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739547
Original Article

Influence of Various Desensitizing Mouthrinses and Simulated Toothbrushing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: An In Vitro Study and Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, SS Nagara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
,
Parvathi Sudeep
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, SS Nagara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
,
Vinutha Manjunath
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, SS Nagara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
,
B.M. Annapoorna
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, SS Nagara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
,
L. Krishna Prasada
2   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India
,
3   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, SS Nagara, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objectives Bulk-filled composite resins are popularly used for posterior restorations due to various advantages. Routine oral hygiene measures like toothbrushing and the use of various mouthrinses can influence the mechanical properties of composite resins. Desensitizing mouthrinses are widely used as well, to manage dentinal hypersensitivity. Studies on the influence of desensitizing mouthrinses on bulk-filled composites are limited. Hence, the objective of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of toothbrushing and various desensitizing mouthrinses on the surface roughness and microhardness of Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill composite resin.

Materials and Methods Fifty Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill composite resin disks were prepared and were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10). Group 1 (Control): no toothbrushing and no mouthrinse; Group 2: toothbrushing only; Group 3: toothbrushing + HiOra-K mouthrinse; Group 4: toothbrushing + Listerine Sensitive mouthrinse; and Group 5: toothbrushing + Shy-OR mouthrinse. The specimens were brushed with a soft bristle brush using a toothpaste slurry and immersed in respective mouthrinse twice daily for 1 month. The mean surface roughness (average roughness) and microhardness (Vickers Pyramid number) values were determined and the data were tabulated. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Post-hoc Tukey test, and Pearson correlation test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results Specimens treated with HiOra-K mouthrinse exhibited maximum surface roughness (p < 0.05) and specimens treated with Listerine Sensitive exhibited the least microhardness (p < 0.05). A weak negative correlation was found between surface roughness and microhardness for groups 1, 2, and 5, while a weak positive correlation was found for groups 3 and 4.

Conclusions It is suggested that desensitizing mouthrinses containing alcohol or essential oils can lead to increased surface roughness and reduction in microhardness of bulk-fill composites, which could have an undesirable effect on their clinical performance.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 February 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Lopes LS, Sampaio Filho HR, Albuquerque EG, Tardem C, Miranda MS, Barceleiro MO. How do the optical properties of the bulk fill posterior composites change after 2 years of simulated toothbrushing?. Braz Dent Sci 2019; 22 (03) 378-386
  • 2 Mara da Silva T, Barbosa Dantas DC, Franco TT, Franco LT, Rocha Lima Huhtala MF. Surface degradation of composite resins under staining and brushing challenges. J Dent Sci 2019; 14 (01) 87-92
  • 3 Bin Nooh AN, Nahedh HA, AlRefeai M, Alkhudhairy F. The effect of irradiance on the degree of conversion and volumetric polymerization shrinkage of different bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (02) 312-319
  • 4 Shimokawa C, Giannini M, André CB. et al. In vitro evaluation of surface properties and wear resistance of conventional and bulk-fill resin-based composites after brushing with a dentifrice. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (06) 637-647
  • 5 Ivoclar Vivadent AG. Research and Development. Liechtenstein. Brochure. Accessed October 5, 2021 from https://asia.ivoclarvivadent.com/en-as/all-products/composites/tetric-n-line 2019
  • 6 da Silva EM, de Sá Rodrigues CU, Dias DA, da Silva S, Amaral CM, Guimarães JG. Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent 2014; 39 (05) 521-529
  • 7 Trauth KGS, Godoi AP, Colucci V, Corona SAM, Catirse ABCEB. The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26 (03) 209-214
  • 8 Miranda Dde A, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL, Lovadino JR. Effects of mouthwashes on Knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25 (02) 168-173
  • 9 Jyothi K, Crasta S, Venugopal P. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness of a nanofilled resin composite restorative material: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2012; 15 (03) 214-217
  • 10 Molina A, García-Gargallo M, Montero E, Tobías A, Sanz M, Martín C. Clinical efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for the control of dentin hypersensitivity and root sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg 2017; 15 (02) 84-94
  • 11 Prado V, Santos K, Fontenele R, Soares J, Vale G. Effect of over the counter mouthwashes with and without alcohol on sorption and solubility of bulk fill resins. J Clin Exp Dent 2020; 12 (12) e1150-e1156
  • 12 Bahbishi N, Mzain W, Badeeb B, Nassar HM. Color stability and micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite materials after exposure to common beverages. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (03) 787-787
  • 13 Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Eiam-O-Pas K. et al. Surface changes of various bulk-fill resin-based composites after exposure to different food-simulating liquid and beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (02) 126-135
  • 14 Yilmaz E, Mujdeci A. The effect of mouthrinses on surface roughness of two nanohybrid resin composites. Braz Dent Sci 2021; 24 (02) 1-10
  • 15 Shanbhog R, Nikitha BS, Nandlal B, Thippeswamy M. Effect of dentifrice of varying fluoride concentration on surface microhardness of fluorosed enamel: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2016; 17 (04) 257-264
  • 16 Rocha Ade C, Lima Cde, Santos Mdo CM da S, Montes MAJR. Evaluation of surface roughness of a nanofill resin composite after simulated brushing and immersion in mouthrinses, alcohol and water. Mater Res 2010; 13 (01) 77-80
  • 17 Kodaka T, Kuroiwa M, Kuroiwa M. et al. Effects of brushing with a dentifrice for sensitive teeth on tubule occlusion and abrasion of dentin. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 2001; 50 (01) 57-64
  • 18 Gürdal P, Akdeniz BG, Hakan Sen B. The effects of mouthrinses on microhardness and colour stability of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29 (09) 895-901
  • 19 de Azevedo Miranda D, dos Santos Bertoldo CE, Ambrosano GM, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR. Effect of curing light distance and different mouthwashes on the sorption and solubility of a nanofilled composite. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013; 8 (01) 88-102
  • 20 Comba A, Scotti N, Maravić T. et al. Vickers hardness and shrinkage stress evaluation of low and high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12 (07) 1477-1477
  • 21 Tartaglia GM, Tadakamadla SK, Connelly ST, Sforza C, Martín C. Adverse events associated with home use of mouthrinses: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2019; 10: 2042098619854881
  • 22 Dündar M, Çal E, Gökçe B, Türkün M, Özcan M. Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14 (05) 579-586
  • 23 Lassila L, Dupont A, Lahtinen K, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Effects of different polishing protocols and curing time on surface properties of a bulk-fill composite resin. Chin J Dent Res 2020; 23 (01) 63-69
  • 24 Paolone G, Moratti E, Goracci C, Gherlone E, Vichi A. Effect of finishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of full-body bulk-fill resin composites. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (24) 5657
  • 25 Durán G, Tisi JP, Rodríguez G, Henríquez I, Orellana R. The effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface gloss of bulk-fill resin composites. Int J Inter Dent. 2020; 13 (01) 17-20
  • 26 Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Gloss and stain resistance of ceramic-polymer CAD/CAM restorative blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (Suppl. 01) S40-S45
  • 27 Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1991; 70 (09) 1299-1305
  • 28 Martos J, Machado Silveira LF, Silveira CF, Suita de Castro LA, Ferrer-Luque CM. The effect of different organic solvents on the degradation of restorative materials. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (03) 347-351
  • 29 Leal JP, da Silva JD, Leal RFM, Oliveira-Júnior CDC, Prado VLG, Vale GC. Effect of mouthwashes on solubility and sorption of restorative composites. Int J Dent 2017; 2017: 5865691
  • 30 Yap AU, Tan BW, Tay LC, Chang KM, Loy TK, Mok BY. Effect of mouthrinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2003; 28 (06) 740-746
  • 31 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (03) 211-222
  • 32 Münchow EA, Correa MB, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Zanchi CH. Correlation between surface roughness and microhardness of experimental composites with varying filler concentration. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (03) 299-304
  • 33 de Paula AB, de Fúcio SB, Alonso RC, Ambrosano GM, Puppin-Rontani RM. Influence of chemical degradation on the surface properties of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent 2014; 39 (03) E109-E117
  • 34 Gürgan S, Onen A, Köprülü H. In vitro effects of alcohol-containing and alcohol-free mouthrinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24 (03) 244-246
  • 35 Örtengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behaviour of three composite resin materials. J Dent 2001; 29 (01) 35-41
  • 36 Nagem Filho H, D'Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD, Marsola FP. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 2003; 14 (01) 37-41
  • 37 Chung KH. The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. J Dent Res 1990; 69 (03) 852-856