PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Coloproctology 2021; 41(04): 425-429
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740097
Original Article

The Importance of the Therapeutic Care Plan in Colorectal Surgery

Henrique Carvalho e Silva Figueiredo 
1   Physician and former student of Santa Marcelina College, Department of General Surgery and Coloproctology Service, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Isaac José Felippe Corrêa Neto 
2   Physician specialist in Coloproctology and professor at Santa Marcelina College, Department of General Surgery and Coloproctology Service, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Jéssica Mocerino 
1   Physician and former student of Santa Marcelina College, Department of General Surgery and Coloproctology Service, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Mariana Campello de Oliveira 
1   Physician and former student of Santa Marcelina College, Department of General Surgery and Coloproctology Service, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Laercio Robles 
3   Physician specialist in Coloproctology, professor at Santa Marcelina College and head of the Department of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Coloproctology Service, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction A therapeutic plan is elaborated based on the health needs of each user, allowing a multidisciplinary team to assess diagnoses, treatment options, bonds, and optimal hospitalization time.

Objectives To identify risk management tools already used and implemented in a reference teaching hospital in the city of São Paulo and to analyze their application and risk factors in medium and large colorectal surgery.

Method Observational, longitudinal, and prospective study, with 30 patients with colorectal disease hospitalized in the surgical ward of the coloproctology service and in need of surgical treatment. In the first group, the protocol was applied with the knowledge of the researcher only, and, in the second group, with the knowledge of both the researcher and the attending physicians.

Results Sixty percent of the patients were female with a mean age of 60.93 years and body mass index (BMI) of 26.07 Kg/m2.

After surgery, patients in the first group who did not receive venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in the first 24 hours had an increased risk of having the event compared with those who returned to prophylaxis (p < 0.005), thus suggesting this prophylaxis was a protective factor against thromboembolic event (p = 0.006). This group also had a higher risk of hypoglycemia when no strict control was performed (p = 0.041).

Conclusion The compliance to hospital protocols with application monitoring, notedly in teaching places with annual admission of resident physicians, is a fundamental part of the adequate care of the patient combined with the implementation of therapeutic plans.

Keywords

therapeutic plan - risk management - colorectal surgery


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Januar 2021

Angenommen: 06. August 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Dezember 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 Mattos RA. A integralidade na prática (ou sobre a prática da integralidade). Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20 (05) 1411-1416
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Campos GWS. Subjetividade e administração de pessoal: considerações sobre modos de gerenciar o trabalho em equipes de saúde. In: Merhy EE, Onocko R. organizadores. Agir em saúde: um desafio para o público. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec; 1997: 229-266
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Franco TB, Magalhães Jr HM. In O Trabalho em Saúde: olhando e experienciando o SUS no cotidiano; HUCITEC, 2004-2a. edição; São Paulo, SP.
  • 4 Pinto DM, Jorge MSB, Pinto AGA. et al. Projeto terapêutico singular na produção do cuidado integral: uma construção eletiva. Texto Contexto Enferm 2011; 20 (03) 493-302
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pinheiro R, Mattos RA. Cuidado: as fronteiras da integralidade. Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec/Abrasco; 2004: 57-74
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 McNair AGK, Choh CTP, Metcalfe C. et al. Maximising recruitment into randomised controlled trials: the role of multidisciplinary cancer teams. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44 (17) 2623-2626
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Twelves CJ, Thomson CS, Young J, Gould A. Scottish Breast Cancer Focus Group and Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Entry into clinical trials in breast cancer: the importance of specialist teams. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34 (07) 1004-1007
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kelly SL, Jackson JE, Hickey BE, Szallasi FG, Bond CA. Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34 (01) 57-60
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD. Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work?. Cancer 1997; 79 (12) 2380-2384
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ. et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (10) CD001431
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Volandes AE, Paasche-Orlow MK, Barry MJ. et al. Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009; 338 (01) b2159
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Steel N. Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey. BMJ 2000; 320 (7247): 1446-1447
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77 (04) 219-226
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Strong S, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Wilson C, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. ‘The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual’: a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology. Trials 2016; 17 (01) 212-220
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Helmreich RL, Schaefer HG. Team performance in the operating room. In M. S. Bogner (Ed.), Human error in medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2014: 225-253
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT. et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 2009; 197 (05) 678-685
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Burtscher MJ, Manser T. Team mental models and their potential to improve teamwork and safety: A review and implications for future research in healthcare. Saf Sci 2012; 50 (05) 1344-1354
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Buchlak QD, Yanamadala V, Leveque JC, Sethi R. Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9 (03) 316-326
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350 (9094): 1795-1798
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Silva FG, Tavares-Neto J. Avaliação dos Prontuários Médicos de Hospitais de Ensino do Brasil. Rev Bras Educ Med 2007; 31 (02) 113-121
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hamilton DW, Heaven B, Thomson RG, Wilson JA, Exley C. Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (07) e012559
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Tooher R, Middleton P, Pham C. et al. A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg 2005; 241 (03) 397-415
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Leite SMO, Maia Jr CLS, Silveira AM. Tromboembolismo venoso e câncer colorretal: um desafio para o cirurgião. Relato de caso e revisão de literatura. Rev Bras Coloproctol 2011; 31 (02) 200-204
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Barros-Sena MA, Genestra M. Profilaxia da trombose venosa profunda em pós-operatórios de cirurgias ortopédicas em um hospital do Rio de Janeiro Brasil. Prática Hospitalar; 2008: 150-156
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al; ENDORSE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371 (9610): 387-394
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Rogers Jr SO, Zinner MJ. The role of perioperative hyperglycemia in postoperative infections. Adv Surg 2009; 43 (01) 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kwon S, Thompson R, Dellinger P, Yanez D, Farrohki E, Flum D. Importance of perioperative glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (01) 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Sharma A, Deeb AP, Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Tobacco smoking and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 258 (02) 296-300
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Richards CH, Platt JJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The impact of perioperative risk, tumor pathology and surgical complications on disease recurrence following potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (01) 83-89
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (02) 121-128
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ji HB, Zhu WT, Wei Q, Wang XX, Wang HB, Chen QP. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24 (15) 1666-1678
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Forsmo HM, Pfeffer F, Rasdal A, Sintonen H, Körner H, Erichsen C. Pre- and postoperative stoma education and guidance within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 2016; 36 (Pt A): 121-126
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar