The Effect of “Off Hours” on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in a Diverse U.S. Cohort

Erol Arslan; Brett D. Einerson; Jingwen Zhang; Jun Zhang; D. Ware Branch

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740119

American Journal of Perinatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(01): 089-097
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740119

Original Article

The Effect of “Off Hours” on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in a Diverse U.S. Cohort

Erol Arslan ^*

¹Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah

²Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Van Training and Research Hospital, Van/Turkey

,

Brett D. Einerson

¹Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah

³Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, Utah

,

Jingwen Zhang

⁴Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

,

Jun Zhang

⁴Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

,

D. Ware Branch

¹Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah

³Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, Utah

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the “off-hour effect” on maternal and neonatal adverse events in a large cohort representing U.S. population.

Study Design A secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL) dataset with 208,695 women and 229,385 deliveries was performed. The study included the deliveries of ≥23 gestational weeks from 19 hospitals in the United States from 2002 to 2008. Babies with congenital anomalies were excluded from neonatal outcomes. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients delivered during weekdays versus off hours (nights and weekends). The primary outcomes of the study were composite maternal and composite neonatal adverse events. The secondary outcomes were delivery type and individual maternal and neonatal adverse events including maternal death and perinatal mortality rate. Associations between off hours and all the outcomes were analyzed in bivariable and multivariable analyses. The same analyses were performed in strata by indication for admission (spontaneous labor or induction of labor).

Results Composite maternal adverse events (6.19 vs. 6.06%, p = 0.41) and maternal death (0.01 vs. 0.01%, p = 0.19) were not significantly different between off hours and weekday groups. In contrast, composite neonatal adverse events (6.91 vs. 5.84%, p < 0.001) and perinatal mortality rate (1.03 vs. 0.77%, p < 0.001) were higher in the off-hour group. After adjusting for confounding variables, only the composite neonatal outcome continued to be associated with off hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.16). Stratified analyses showed that the off-hour effect for the neonatal composite outcome was not present in those presenting in spontaneous labor (6.1 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.40).

Conclusion Off-hour delivery was not associated with severe maternal morbidity and was only modestly associated with severe neonatal morbidity. This association was observed in women undergoing induction, not in those presenting in spontaneous labor. These data draw into question the existence of a clinically meaningful and correctable “off-hour effect” in obstetrics.

Key Points

The presence of a significant off-hour effect in obstetrics is still questionable.
If the off-hour effect exists, it seems that not to be related with staffing issues.
There is not a big difference for adverse events at off hours in spontaneously laboring patients.

Keywords

off hours - night - weekend - adverse event - maternal - neonatal

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Aylin P, Yunus A, Bottle A, Majeed A, Bell D. Weekend mortality for emergency admissions. A large, multicentre study. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (03) 213-217
2 Handel AE, Patel SV, Skingsley A, Bramley K, Sobieski R, Ramagopalan SV. Weekend admissions as an independent predictor of mortality: an analysis of Scottish hospital admissions. BMJ Open 2012; 2 (06) e001789
3 Metcalfe D, Castillo-Angeles M, Rios-Diaz AJ, Havens JM, Haider A, Salim A. Is there a “weekend effect” in emergency general surgery?. J Surg Res 2018; 222: 219-224
4 Galyfos G, Sigala F, Bazigos G, Filis K. Weekend effect among patients undergoing elective vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70 (06) 2038-2045
5 Stewart JH, Andrews J, Cartlidge PH. Numbers of deaths related to intrapartum asphyxia and timing of birth in all Wales perinatal survey, 1993-5. BMJ 1998; 316 (7132): 657-660
6 Heller G, Misselwitz B, Schmidt S. Early neonatal mortality, asphyxia related deaths, and timing of low risk births in Hesse, Germany, 1990-8: observational study. BMJ 2000; 321 (7256): 274-275
7 de Graaf JP, Ravelli AC, Visser GH. et al. Increased adverse perinatal outcome of hospital delivery at night. BJOG 2010; 117 (09) 1098-1107
8 Wu YW, Pham TN, Danielsen B, Towner D, Smith L, Johnston SC. Nighttime delivery and risk of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (01) 37.e1-37.e6
9 Palmer WL, Bottle A, Aylin P. Association between day of delivery and obstetric outcomes: observational study. BMJ 2015; 351: h5774
10 Luo ZC, Liu S, Wilkins R, Kramer MS. Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Risks of stillbirth and early neonatal death by day of week. CMAJ 2004; 170 (03) 337-341
11 Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Scott JG, Brockelsby JC, Trussell J. Weekend working: a retrospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal outcomes in a large NHS delivery unit. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 199: 5-10
12 Feldman DS, Bollman DL, Fridman M. et al. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (04) 587.e1-587.e13
13 Srinivas SK, Small DS, Macheras M, Hsu JY, Caldwell D, Lorch S. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (06) 770.e1-770.e9
14 Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM. et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (04) 326.e1-326.e10
15 Report from nine maternal mortality review committees. Accessed November 8, 2021 at: https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/ReportfromNineMMRCs.pdf
16 Chu J, Johnston TA, Geoghegan J. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Maternal collapse in pregnancy and the puerperium: green-top guideline No. 56. BJOG 2020; 127 (05) e14-e52
17 Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL) - 3.13 GB. Accessed November 8, 2021 at: https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/study/2331
18 Pasupathy D, Wood AM, Pell JP, Fleming M, Smith GC. Time of birth and risk of neonatal death at term: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2010; 341: c3498
19 Gijsen R, Hukkelhoven CW, Schipper CM, Ogbu UC, de Bruin-Kooistra M, Westert GP. Effects of hospital delivery during off-hours on perinatal outcome in several subgroups: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012; 12: 92
20 Lyndon A, Lee HC, Gay C, Gilbert WM, Gould JB, Lee KA. Effect of time of birth on maternal morbidity during childbirth hospitalization in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (05) 705.e1-705.e11
21 Reid HE, Hayes D, Wittkowski A, Vause S, Whitcombe J, Heazell A. The effect of senior obstetric presence on maternal and neonatal outcomes in UK NHS maternity units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2017; 124 (09) 1321-1330

Zusatzmaterial

Supplementary Material