Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2021; 62(03): e208-e220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740142
Artículo de Revisión | Review Article

Pressure and Contact Area in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review[*]

Article in several languages: español | English
Julio Contreras 
1   Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Instituto Traumatológico, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
3   Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Clínica BUPA, Santiago, Chile
,
Rodrigo Liendo 
4   Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
5   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
,
Cristóbal Maccioni
3   Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Clínica BUPA, Santiago, Chile
,
Manuel Beltrán 
1   Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Instituto Traumatológico, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To provide a comprehensive synopsis and analysis of biomechanical studies on the magnitude and distribution of pressure at the tendon-footprint interface of rotator cuff tears reported in the literature in the last five years.

Methods The research was performed according to the methods described in the Cochrane Manual. The results are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus. The search was performed on June 1st, 2020. We identified and included ex vivo basic science studies and published biomechanical studies that evaluated the magnitude and distribution of pressure at the tendon-footprint interface of rotator cuff tears repaired between January 2015 and June 2020. Systematic searches on the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were performed using the terms and Boolean operators: (Rotator Cuff OR Supraspinatus OR Infraspinatus OR Subscapularis OR Teres Minor) AND Pressure AND Footprint. In the Embase database, respecting its syntax, the following was used: Rotator Cuff AND Pressure AND Footprint.

Results In total, 15 of the 87 articles found fulfilled all the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis.

Conclusion The pressure and contact area would be biomechanically optimized with an equivalent transosseous double-row repair, without knots in the medial row, and with the use of tapes for its execution, specific repair concepts for delaminated tears, and a limitation of abduction in the immediate postoperative period.

Keywords

rotator cuff - pressure - suture - suture techniques - tendon injuries - tendons

* Research conducted at Instituto Traumatológico, Santiago, Chile.




Publication History

Received: 28 June 2020

Accepted: 06 August 2021

Article published online:
22 December 2021

© 2021. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 Jancuska J, Matthews J, Miller T, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ. A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Rotator Cuff. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (09) 2325967118797891
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Collin P, Colmar M, Thomazeau H. et al. Clinical and MRI Outcomes 10 Years After Repair of Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (21) 1854-1863
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Collin P, Thomazeau H, Walch G. et al. Clinical and structural outcome twenty years after repair of isolated supraspinatus tendon tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28 (01) 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Piper CC, Hughes AJ, Ma Y, Wang H, Neviaser AS. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (03) 572-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Rossi LA, Rodeo SA, Chahla J, Ranalletta M. Current Concepts in Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Biomechanical, Functional, and Structural Outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (09) 2325967119868674
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Chona DV, Lakomkin N, Lott A. et al. The timing of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (11) 2054-2059
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Haque A, Pal Singh H. Does structural integrity following rotator cuff repair affect functional outcomes and pain scores? A meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow 2018; 10 (03) 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (02) 219-224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jensen PT, Lambertsen KL, Frich LH. Assembly, maturation, and degradation of the supraspinatus enthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (04) 739-750
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Desmoineaux P. Failed rotator cuff repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (1S): S63-S73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cicak N, Klobucar H, Bicanic G, Trsek D. Arthroscopic transosseous suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (05) 565.e1-565.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Park MC, Cadet ER, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS. Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (08) 1154-1159
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hohmann E, König A, Kat CJ, Glatt V, Tetsworth K, Keough N. Single- versus double-row repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears using suture anchors. A systematic review and meta-analysis of basic biomechanical studies. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28 (05) 859-868
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE. “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (12) 1360.e1-1360.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mazzocca AD, Bollier MJ, Ciminiello AM. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs over time. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (05) 592-599 Erratum in: Arthroscopy. 2010; 26(6): 867
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Higgins JPT, Green S. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.9 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
  • 17 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Caldow J, Richardson M, Balakrishnan S, Sobol T, Lee PV, Ackland DC. A cruciate suture technique for rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (02) 619-626
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Dyrna F, Beitzel K, Pauzenberger L. et al. A Superolaterally Placed Anchor for Subscapularis “Leading-Edge” Refixation: A Biomechanical Study. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (05) 1306-1313.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Huntington L, Coles-Black J, Richardson M. et al. The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A comparative biomechanics study. Injury 2018; 49 (11) 2047-2052
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, Chun YM. Footprint Contact Area and Interface Pressure Comparison Between the Knotless and Knot-Tying Transosseous-Equivalent Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (01) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Liu RW, Lam PH, Shepherd HM, Murrell GAC. Tape Versus Suture in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Biomechanical Analysis and Assessment of Failure Rates at 6 Months. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (04) 2325967117701212
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Liu VK, Bouwmeester TM, Smith GCS, Lam PH. Biomechanical comparison of knotless wide suture double-row SutureBridge rotator cuff repair to double-row standard suture repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29 (08) 1621-1626
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ng SHA, Tan CHJ. Double-row repair of rotator cuff tears: Comparing tendon contact area between techniques. World J Orthop 2020; 11 (01) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Park JS, McGarry MH, Campbell ST. et al. The optimum tension for bridging sutures in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (09) 2118-2125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Park MC, Peterson AB, McGarry MH, Park CJ, Lee TQ. Knotless Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Improves Biomechanical Self-reinforcement Without Diminishing Footprint Contact Compared With Medial Knotted Repair. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (08) 1473-1481
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Pauzenberger L, Heuberer PR, Dyrna F. et al. Double-Layer Rotator Cuff Repair: Anatomic Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule and Rotator Cuff Improves Biomechanical Properties in Repairs of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (13) 3165-3173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Simmer Filho J, Voss A, Pauzenberger L. et al. Footprint coverage comparison between knotted and knotless techniques in a single-row rotator cuff repair: biomechanical analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Smith GCS, Lam PH. Shoulder abduction diminishes self-reinforcement in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair in both knotted and knotless techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (12) 3818-3825
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Smith GCS, Bouwmeester TM, Lam PH. Knotless double-row SutureBridge rotator cuff repairs have improved self-reinforcement compared with double-row SutureBridge repairs with tied medial knots: a biomechanical study using an ovine model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (12) 2206-2212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Stone AV, Luo TD, Sharma A, Danelson KA, De Gregorio M, Freehill MT. Optimizing the Double-Row Construct: An Untied Medial Row Demonstrates Equivalent Mean Contact Pressures in a Rotator Cuff Model. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (04) 2325967120914932
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Urch E, Lin CC, Itami Y. et al. Improved Rotator Cuff Footprint Contact Characteristics With an Augmented Repair Construct Using Lateral Edge Fixation. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (02) 444-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified Mason-Allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (11) 2440-2447
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J. et al. Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (02) 377-386
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Burkhart SS, Adams CR, Burkhart SS, Schoolfield JD. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (03) 274-281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Christoforetti JJ, Krupp RJ, Singleton SB, Kissenberth MJ, Cook C, Hawkins RJ. Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (04) 523-530
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Liem D, Dedy NJ, Hauschild G. et al. In vivo blood flow after rotator cuff reconstruction in a sheep model: comparison of single versus double row. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (02) 470-477
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Bisson LJ, Manohar LM. A biomechanical comparison of the pullout strength of No. 2 FiberWire suture and 2-mm FiberWire tape in bovine rotator cuff tendons. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (11) 1463-1468
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 De Carli A, Lanzetti RM, Monaco E, Labianca L, Mossa L, Ferretti A. The failure mode of two reabsorbable fixation systems: Swivelock with Fibertape versus Bio-Corkscrew with Fiberwire in bovine rotator cuff. J Orthop Sci 2012; 17 (06) 789-795 Erratum in: J Orthop Sci. 2012; 17(6): 830
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Dines JS, Blackburn A, Crues J, Tibone JE. Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (08) 1496-1503
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (06) 1184-1193
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Yoo JC, Rhee YG, Shin SJ. et al. Subscapularis tendon tear classification based on 3-dimensional anatomic footprint: a cadaveric and prospective clinical observational study. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (01) 19-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Sonnabend DH, Yu Y, Howlett CR, Harper GD, Walsh WR. Laminated tears of the human rotator cuff: a histologic and immunochemical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10 (02) 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Nimura A, Kato A, Yamaguchi K. et al. The superior capsule of the shoulder joint complements the insertion of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (07) 867-872
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (06) 1229-1240
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Baleani M, Ohman C, Guandalini L. et al. Comparative study of different tendon grasping techniques for arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006; 21 (08) 799-803
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (02) 403-410
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Park MC, McGarry MH, Gunzenhauser RC, Benefiel MK, Park CJ, Lee TQ. Does transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair biomechanically provide a “self-reinforcement” effect compared with single-row repair?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (12) 1813-1821
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Mook WR, Greenspoon JA, Millett PJ. Arthroscopic Double-Row Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair with a Knotless Self-Reinforcing Technique. Open Orthop J 2016; 10: 286-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Kim SH, Kim J, Choi YE, Lee HR. Healing disturbance with suture bridge configuration repair in rabbit rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25 (03) 478-486
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar