Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e210-e215
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740312
Research Article

Sex Disparities in Productivity among Oculoplastic Surgeons

Mckenzee Chiam 
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Mona L. Camacci 
2   Department of Ophthalmology, David & Ilene Flaum Eye Institute University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
,
Alicia Khan
3   School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, Dist. of Columbia
,
Erik B. Lehman
4   Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Seth M. Pantanelli 
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations Financial Disclosure S.M.P. serves in the role of consultant, advisory board member, and Medical Monitor for Carl Zeiss Meditec. He also serves in the role of consultant to Bausch & Lomb. These relationships are not relevant to the present work. Remaining authors have no financial or other interests to disclose.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study is to investigate sex differences in academic rank, publication productivity, and National Institute of Health (NIH) funding among oculoplastic surgeons and whether there is an association between American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) membership and scholarly output.

Methods Sex, residency graduation year, and academic rank were obtained from institutional websites of 113 U.S. ophthalmology programs. H-indices and m-quotients were obtained from the Scopus database. NIH funding information was obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool.

Results Of the 272 surgeons, 74 (30.2%) were females. When adjusted for career duration, differences in female to male proportions were only significant at the rank of assistant professor (assistant: 74.3 vs. 48.5%, p = 0.047; associate: 18.9 vs. 24.6%, p = 0.243; full professor: 13.0 vs. 37.2%, p = 0.114). Women had a shorter career duration than men [10.0 (interquartile range or IQR 12.0) vs. 21.0 (IQR 20.0) years; p < 0.001] and a lower h-index [4.0 (IQR 5.0) vs. 7.0 (IQR 10.0); p < 0.001], but similar m-quotients [0.4 (IQR 0.4) vs. 0.4 (IQR 0.4); p = 0.9890]. Among ASOPRS members, females had a lower h-index than males [5.0 (IQR 6.0) vs. 9.0 (IQR 10.0); p < 0.001] due to career length differences. No difference in productivity between sexes was found among non-ASOPRS members. ASOPRS members from both sexes had higher scholarly output than their non-ASOPRS counterparts. Just 2.7% (2/74) of females compared with 5.3% (9/171) of males received NIH funding (p = 0.681).

Conclusion Sex differences in academic ranks and h-indices are likely due to the smaller proportion of females with long career durations. ASOPRS membership may confer opportunities for increased scholarly output.

Keywords

oculoplastic - ophthalmology - academic rank - publication productivity - NIH funding - disparities - gender


Publication History

Received: 16 May 2021

Accepted: 13 September 2021

Article published online:
05 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA