Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 72(03): 205-213
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740539
Original Cardiovascular

Decellularized Pulmonary Xenograft Matrix PplusN versus Cryopreserved Homograft for RVOT Reconstruction during Ross Procedure in Adults

1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Matz Andreas Haugen
2   Independent Researcher, Olso, Norway
,
Dejan Radakovic
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Khaled Hamouda
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Armin Gorski
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Rainer Leyh
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Constanze Bening
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinic Würzburg, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Background Decellularized pulmonary homografts are being increasingly adopted for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in adult patients undergoing the Ross procedure. Few reports presented Matrix PplusN xenograft (Matrix) in a negative light. The objective of this study was to compare our midterm outcomes of Matrix xenograft versus standard cryopreserved pulmonary homograft (CPHG).

Methods Eighteen patients received Matrix xenograft between January 2012 and June 2016, whereas 66 patients received CPHG. Using nonparametric statistical tests and survival analysis, we compared midterm echocardiographic and clinical outcomes between the groups.

Results Except for significant age difference (the Matrix group was significantly older with 57 ± 8 years than the CPHG group, 48 ± 9 years, p = 0.02), the groups were similar in all other baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences in cardiopulmonary bypass times (208.3 ± 32.1 vs. 202.8 ± 34.8) or in cross-clamp times (174 ± 33.9 vs. 184.4 ± 31.1) for Matrix and CPHG, respectively. The Matrix group had significantly inferior freedom from reintervention than the CPHG group with 77.8 versus 98.5% (p = 0.02). Freedom from pulmonary valve regurgitation ≥ 2 was not significantly different between the groups with 82.4 versus 90.5% for Matrix versus CPHG, respectively. After median follow-up of 4.9 years, Matrix xenograft developed significantly higher peak pressure gradients compared with CPHG (20.4 ± 15.5 vs. 12.2 ± 9.0 mm Hg; p = 0.04).

Conclusion After 5 years of clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, the decellularized Matrix xenograft had inferior freedom from reintervention compared with the standard CPHG. Closer follow-up is necessary to avoid progression of valve failure into right ventricular deterioration.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. Juni 2021

Angenommen: 20. September 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Dezember 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany