RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741100
Spinal Dysraphisms: A New Anatomical–Clinicoradiological Classification
Abstract
Background Spinal dysraphisms refer to the congenital abnormalities of the spine and spinal cord due to aberrations in the processes of gastrulation, primary neurulation, and secondary neurulation. Embryology of many complex spinal dysraphisms are yet poorly understood and there is no agreeable anatomical–clinicoradiological classification with inclusion of recently documented and complex spinal dysraphisms.
Aims and Objectives The main objective of this study was to review the imaging features of spinal dysraphisms with a better understanding of embryological abnormalities and propose a new classification inclusive of all complex and unusual dysraphisms based on anatomical and clinicoradiological correlation.
Materials and Methods This was a retrospective single institutional observational study of 391 cases of spinal dysraphism for 10 years in our institution. Of 391 cases included in the study, 204 were males and 187 were females. Also, 123 cases belonged to the 0–6 months age group, 38 cases belonged to the 7–12 months age group, 156 belonged to the 1–5 years age group, 39 cases belonged to the 6–10 years age group, and 35 cases belonged to 10–20 years age group.
Results An anatomical–clinicoradiological analysis of cases yielded a high proportion of cases of spinal lipomas, including lipomyeloceles and lipomyelomeningoceles (31.3%) and posterior myelomeningocele (14.2%). Anterior myelocoele (0.2%), sacral chordoma(0.2%), and intrasacral meningocele (0.2%) formed the least proportion of cases. A new classification was proposed based on the analysis of acquired data.
Conclusion A structured approach in imaging spinal dysraphism is necessary for imaging evaluation in recent years. The proposed new classification based on clinicoradiological correlation and anatomic location is inclusive of unusual and complex dysraphisms.
Keywords
spinal dysraphism - embryology - magnetic resonance imaging - open spinal dysraphism - closed spinal dysraphismPresentation at a Meeting
Organization: 74th Annual Conference of IRIA: Dr. N. G. Gadekar oration, 2021.
Place: Bengaluru
Date: Jan 21 to 24, 2021
Authors’ Contributions
Conception and design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript editing and reviewing and final approval.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. Januar 2022
© 2022. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Patel S, Barkovich AJ. Analysis and classification of cerebellar malformations. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23 (07) 1074-1087
- 2 Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Cama A. Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 2000; 42 (07) 471-491
- 3 Sadler TW. Embryology of neural tube development. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2005; 135C (01) 2-8
- 4 Moore K. Congenital Abnormalities of the Spine. In: Coley BD. ed. Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2013: 449-60
- 5 Melvin EC, George TM, Worley G. et al; NTD Collaborative Group. Genetic studies in neural tube defects. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000; 32 (01) 1-9
- 6 Chellathurai A, Ayyamperumal B, Thirumaran R, Kathirvelu G, Muthaiyan P, Kannappan S. Segmental spinal dysgenesis-“redefined”. Asian Spine J 2019; 13 (02) 189-197
- 7 Gomi A, Oguma H, Furukawa R. Sacrococcygeal dimple: new classification and relationship with spinal lesions. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (09) 1641-1645
- 8 Pang D, Zovickian J, Oviedo A, Moes GS. Limited dorsal myeloschisis: a distinctive clinicopathological entity. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (06) 1555-1579 , discussion 1579–1580
- 9 Dias MS, Azizkhan RG. A novel embryogenetic mechanism for Currarino's triad: inadequate dorsoventral separation of the caudal eminence from hindgut endoderm. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998; 28 (05) 223-229
- 10 Reutter H, Hilger AC, Hildebrandt F, Ludwig M. Underlying genetic factors of the VATER/VACTERL association with special emphasis on the “Renal” phenotype. Pediatr Nephrol 2016; 31 (11) 2025-2033
- 11 Dias MS, Walker ML. The embryogenesis of complex dysraphic malformations: a disorder of gastrulation?. Pediatr Neurosurg 1992; 18 (05–06): 229-253
- 12 Morota N, Ihara S, Ogiwara H. New classification of spinal lipomas based on embryonic stage. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2017; 19 (04) 428-439
- 13 McLone DG, Knepper PA. The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 1989; 15 (01) 1-12
- 14 Kumar J, Afsal M, Garg A. Imaging spectrum of spinal dysraphism on magnetic resonance: a pictorial review. World J Radiol 2017; 9 (04) 178-190
- 15 Uchino A, Mori T, Ohno M. Thickened fatty filum terminale: MR imaging. Neuroradiology 1991; 33 (04) 331-333 [PMID: 1922748 DOI: 10.1007/BF00587817]
- 16 Brown E, Matthes JC, Bazan III C, Jinkins JR. Prevalence of incidental intraspinal lipoma of the lumbosacral spine as determined by MRI. Spine 1994; 19 (07) 833-836
- 17 Rossi A, Biancheri R, Cama A, Piatelli G, Ravegnani M, Tortori-Donati P. Imaging in spine and spinal cord malformations. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50 (02) 177-200
- 18 Patwardhan V, Patanakar T, Patkar D, Armao D, Mukherji SK. MR imaging findings of intramedullary lipomas. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174 (06) 1792-1793
- 19 Pang D, Zovickian J, Moes GS. Retained medullary cord in humans: late arrest of secondary neurulation. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (06) 1500-1519 , discussion 1519
- 20 Lee SM, Cheon JE, Choi YH. et al. Limited dorsal myeloschisis and congenital dermal sinus: comparison of clinical and MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38 (01) 176-182
- 21 Coleman LT, Zimmerman RA, Rorke LB. Ventriculus terminalis of the conus medullaris: MR findings in children. Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16 (07) 1421-1426
- 22 Alrabeeah A, Gillis DA, Giacomantonio M, Lau H. Neurenteric cysts–a spectrum. J Pediatr Surg 1988; 23 (08) 752-754
- 23 Vieira VLG, Bertholdo D. Klippel-Feil syndrome accompanied by partial cleft of the cervical spine: a not-so-unusual combination?. Radiol Bras 2019; 52 (01) 65-66
- 24 Pang D. Sacral agenesis and caudal spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 1993; 32 (05) 755-778 , discussion 778–779
- 25 Muthukumar N. Thoracic myelocystoceles–two variants. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148 (07) 751-756 , discussion 756
- 26 Chellathurai A, Ayyamperumal B, Thirumaran R, Kathirvelu G, Muthaiyan P, Kannappan S. Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis-“Redefined”. Asian Spine J 2019; 13 (02) 189-197
- 27 Morioka T, Murakami N, Kanata A, Tsukamoto H, Suzuki SO. Retained medullary cord with sacral subcutaneous meningocele and congenital dermal sinus. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36 (02) 423-427
- 28 Kosmaidou-Aravidou Z, Siabalioti G, Karpathios S, Grigori P, Panani A. Prenatal diagnosis of a cervical teratoma with a cytogenetic study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19 (06) 377-379
- 29 D'Amore T, Boyce B, Mesfin A. Chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum: clinical management and prognosis. J Spine Surg 2018; 4 (03) 546-552