Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2022; 32(01): 010-015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741411
Original Article

Evaluation of Uterocervical Angle and Cervical Length as Predictors of Spontaneous Preterm Birth

Pramod Kumar Singh 
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Resham Srivastava
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Ishan Kumar 
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Sangeeta Rai
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Saurabh Pandey
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Ram C. Shukla
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Ashish Verma
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, IMS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim The aim of this article was to evaluate uterocervical angle (UCA) and cervical length (CL) measured at 16 to 24 weeks of gestation using transvaginal sonography (TVS) as predictors of spontaneous preterm birth.

Methods In this prospective study, TVS was performed in 159 primigravidas with a singleton, uncomplicated pregnancy at 16 to 24 weeks of gestation to measure the anterior UCA and CL. All the cases were followed until labor to document gestational age at delivery.

Results The risk of spontaneous preterm birth was higher in women with obtuse UCA (>95 degrees) with sensitivity of 86.7%, specificity of 93.0%, positive predictive value of 83.0%, negative predictive value of 94.6%, and p-value of <0.001. The difference between the means was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). UCAs ≥105degrees and 95 to 105 degrees were found to be significantly associated with spontaneous preterm births at <34 weeks and 34 to 37 weeks, respectively. CL <2.5 cm was found to predict spontaneous preterm births at <37 weeks with sensitivity of 31.1%, specificity of 95.6%, and p-value of <0.001. UCA was found to be a better predictor of spontaneous preterm birth with a higher coefficient of variation (56.4%) when compared with CL (16.9%).

Conclusions UCA proved to be a novel ultrasound parameter that can serve as a better predictor of spontaneous preterm births in comparison to CL. A strong correlation exists between obtuse UCA and a risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

Keywords

uterocervical angle - cervical length - spontaneous preterm birth - transvaginal sonography


Publication History

Article published online:
28 February 2022

© 2022. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Cunningham FG, Leveno KG, Bloom SL, Spong CY. Preterm labor. In: Cunningham F, Leveno KG, Bloom SL, Spong CY. eds. William Obstetrics. 24th edition.. New York: McGraw-Hill Education/Medical; 2014. 42. 829-830
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Wendy LW, Katherine WF. Cervical ultrasound and preterm birth. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau W, Levine D. eds. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 4th edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2011. 45. 1527-1528
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 House M, McCabe R, Socrate S. Using imaging-based, three-dimensional models of the cervix and uterus for studies of cervical changes during pregnancy. Clin Anat 2013; 26 (01) 97-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Myers KM, Feltovich H, Mazza E. et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy. J Biomech 2015; 48 (09) 1511-1523
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Greco E, Gupta R, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester screening for spontaneous preterm delivery with maternal characteristics and cervical length. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31 (03) 154-161
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Son M, Grobman WA, Ayala NK, Miller ES. A universal mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length screening program and its associated reduced preterm birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (03) 365.e1-365.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Temming LA, Durst JK, Tuuli MG. et al. Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (04) 523.e1-523.e8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Sochacki-Wójcicka N, Wojcicki J, Bomba-Opon D, Wielgos M. Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46 (03) 377-378
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C. et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 376.e1-376.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sepúlveda-Martínez A, Díaz F, Muñoz H, Valdés E, Parra-Cordero M. Second-trimester anterior cervical angle in a low-risk population as a marker for spontaneous preterm delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther 2017; 41 (03) 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Farràs Llobet A, Higueras T, Calero IZ. et al. Prospective evaluation of the uterocervical angle as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99 (11) 1511-1518
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Llobet F, Reginc'os, Higueras T. The utero cervical angle and its relationship with pre term birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 31 (14) 1881-1884
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Spong CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (2 Pt 1): 405-415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Yoshida K, Jiang H, Kim M. et al. Quantitative evaluation of collagen crosslinks and corresponding tensile mechanical properties in mouse cervical tissue during normal pregnancy. PLoS One 2014; 9 (11) e112391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Myers K, Socrate S, Tzeranis D, House M. Changes in the biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human cervical stroma during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (Suppl. 01) S82-S89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 (02) 172-175
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 (09) 567-572
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A. et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (02) 124.e1-124.e19
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sur B, Misra S, Dash S. Evaluation of the anterior cervical angle of the uterus to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6: 2323-2327
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Boelig RC, Orzechowski KM, Berghella V. Cervical length, risk factors, and delivery outcomes among women with spontaneous preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (17) 2840-2844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Celik E, To M, Gajewska K, Smith GC, Nicolaides KH. Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31 (05) 549-554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Dagdeviren E, Aslan Çetin B, Aydogan Mathyk B, Koroglu N, Topcu EG, Yuksel MA. Can uterocervical angles successfully predict induction of labor in nulliparous women?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 228: 87-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Daskalakis G. Assessment of uterocervical angle width as a predictor of preterm birth: a systematic review of literature. BioMed Res Int 2018; 18: 374-378
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lynch TA, Szlachetka K, Seligman NS. Ultrasonographic change in uterocervical angle is not a risk factor for preterm birth in women with a short cervix. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (11) 1058-1064
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Knight JC, Tenbrink E, Onslow M, Patil AS. Uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of preterm birth in twin gestation. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (07) 648-654
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Buck JN, Orzechowski KM, Berghella V. Racial disparities in cervical length for prediction of preterm birth in a low risk population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (15) 1851-1854
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Thain S, Yeo GSH, Kwek K, Chern B, Tan KH. Spontaneous preterm birth and cervical length in a pregnant Asian population. PLoS One 2020; 15 (04) e0230125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar