Keramikwerkstoffe in der restaurativen Zahnmedizin

Fazit

• Moderne keramische Materialien zeigen deutlich verbesserte Materialeigenschaften.

• Die Festigkeit keramischer Materialien ist entscheidend vom Oberflächenzustand geprägt.

• Eine sorgfältige Politur bestimmt die Lebensdauer einer keramischen Restauration.

• Eine anatoforme Gerüstgestaltung ist bei zirkonoxidgetragenem Zahnersatz unerlässlich.

• Vollkeramik mit hochfesten Materialien eröffnet neue Wege in der Kavitätengestaltung.

• Bei schmelzbegrenzten Kavitäten sollte der klassischen Adhäsivtechnik der Vorzug gegeben werden.

• Mindestschichtstärken von Vollkeramik sollten auch nach der okklusalen Adjustierung eingehalten werden.

• Literatur

• 1 Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508
• 2 Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B et al. Fracture rates and lifetime estimations of CAD/CAM all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 67-73
• 3 Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299-307
• 4 Belli R, Scherrer SS, Reich S et al. In vivo shell-like fractures of veneered-ZrO₂ fixed dental prostheses. Case Stud Eng Fail Anal 2014; 2: 91-99
• 5 Hidaka O, Iwasaki M, Saito M et al. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1336-1344
• 6 Lohbauer U, Müller FA, Petschelt A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 250-256
• 7 Wissenschaftliche Dokumentation IPS e. max® Press. Schaan, Liechtenstein: Ivoclar Vivadent; 2009
• 8 Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD et al. Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 269-273
• 9 Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A et al. Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glassceramic material. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 39-44
• 10 Wiederhorn SM. Influence of water vapor on crack propagation in soda-lime glass. J Am Ceram Assoc 1967; 50: 407-414
• 11 Christensen GJ. Porcelain-fused-to-metal versus zirconia-based ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1036-1039
• 12 Sax C, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 2011; 14: 183-202
• 13 Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 223-227
• 14 Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 237-244
• 15 Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1668-1677
• 16 Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ, de Jager N et al. Prestresses in bilayered allceramic restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87: 139-145
• 17 Lawn BR, Marshall DB. Contact fracture resistance of physically and chemically tempered glass plates – theoretical model. Phys Chem Glass 1977; 18: 7-18
• 18 Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F et al. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 393-398
• 19 Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M et al. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: Adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1312-1320
• 20 Sasse M, Krummel A, Klosa K et al. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 907-915
• 21 Kern M. Keramikschichtstärken neu definiert. ZWR – Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2013; 122: 104-107
• 22 Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Martins LM et al. Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 305-310
• 23 Schmitz JH, Beani M. Effect of different cement types on monolithic lithium disilicate complete crowns with feather-edge preparation design in the posterior region. J Prosthet Dent 2015;
• 24 Arnetzl GV, Arnetzl G. Biomechanische Untersuchung von Inlaygeometrien – Gibt es ein biomechanisches Grundprinzip?. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 119-130
• 25 Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: Systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 751-764
• 26 Rojpaibool T, Leevailoj C. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded to enamel or dentin using different resin cement types and film thicknesses. J Prosthodont 2015;
• 27 Van den Breemer CR, Gresnigt MM, Cune MS. Cementation of glass-ceramic posterior restorations: A systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2015;
• 28 Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 113-127
• 29 Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42: 800-807
• 30 Beier U, Kapferer I, Matkulcik M et al. Klinische Erfahrungen mit silikatkeramischen Restaurationen. Stomatologie 2012; 109: 19-22
• 31 Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2014; 27: 33-43