Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104694
Response to the “Comment on the New DGGG AWMF S3-Guideline on Hysterectomy, or a Plea for LAVH as the Gold Standard for Total Hysterectomy Procedures” by Prof. Rudy Leon De Wilde
Stellungnahme zum „Kommentar zu der neuen DGGG-AWMF-S3-Leitlinie ‚Hysterektomie‘ oder ein Plädoyer für die LAVH als Goldstandard bei der totalen Hysterektomie“ von Prof. Rudy Leon de WildePublication History
Publication Date:
26 April 2016 (online)
I would like to thank Prof. De Wilde for his comment. We particularly appreciate his congratulatory remarks about our work and I would like to take this opportunity to pass on his compliments to all the other members of the Guideline Development Group who voluntarily dedicated so much of their time to bring the task to fruition. I would also like to thank Prof. Kreienberg for suggesting the guideline and thank the board of the DGGG for their decision to ask an external panel to review the guideline (which had already been completed at the end of 2012) and – because of the significance of the guideline for healthcare policies – to commission an evidence report. The fact that we were able to recruit Dr. M. Nothacker with her extensive knowledge of both methodology and gynecology can only be described as a stroke of luck.
-
References
- 1 Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (8) CD003677
- 2 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional procedure overview of laparoscopic techniques for hysterectomy. Online: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg239/evidence/overview-309106333 last access: 11.01.2016
- 3 ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1156-1158
- 4 Gesundheit Austria. Online: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/gesundheit/stationaere_aufenthalte/medizinische_leistungen/index.html last access: 11.01.2016
- 5 ASF. ASF. Online: http://www.sevisa.ch/ last access: 11.01.2016
- 6 AQUA – Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH. Bundesauswertung zum Verfassungsjahr 2012. 15/1 Gynäkologische Operationen 2013. Online: https://www.sqg.de/downloads/Bundesauswertungen/2012/bu_Gesamt_15N1-GYN-OP_2012.pdf last access: 11.01.2016
- 7 Reich H. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 337-344
- 8 Neis KJ, Ulrich K, Zeilmann W et al. Die laparoskopisch-assistierte vaginale Hysterektomie. Der Frauenarzt 1993; 34: 1091-1096
- 9 Semm K. Personal communication. 1991
- 10 Brandner P, Neis KJ. [The significance of laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy—LAVH]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1995; 117: 620-624
- 11 Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3) CD003677
- 12 Woelk JL, Borah BJ, Trabuco EC et al. Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (2 Pt 1) 255-262
- 13 Lonnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22: 78-86
- 14 Donnez J, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy (LASH). J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9: 91-94