Download PDF
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2016; 220(03): 95-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106654
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Medikamentöse Thromboembolie-Prophylaxe in Schwangerschaft und Wochenbett: neue Leitlinienempfehlungen & kritischer Leitlinienvergleich

Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Recommendations from Current Guidelines and their Critical Comparison
W. Rath
1   Medizinische Fakultät Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel
,
P. Tsikouras
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
,
G.-F. von Tempelhoff
3   Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St. Vinzenz Hospital Hanau, Hanau
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 05 March 2016

angenommen nach Überarbeitung06 April 2016

Publication Date:
17 June 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Venöse Thromboembolien (VTE) sind weltweit eine der häufigsten mütterlichen Todesursachen. Die steigende Zahl an Schwangeren mit Risikofaktoren hat zu einer signifikanten Zunahme der VTE-Inzidenz geführt. Mortalität und Morbidität infolge VTE sind potentiell vermeidbar, da mehr als 2/3 dieser Frauen identifizierbare Risikofaktoren aufweisen und von einer adäquaten VTE-Prophylaxe profitieren können. Die Eckpfeiler zur Prävention von VTE sind die individuelle und sorgfältige Erfassung von präexistenten und neu auftretenden/transienten Risikofaktoren in der Schwangerschaft, vor und nach der Geburt sowie eine risikoadaptierte medikamentöse Thromboembolie-Prophylaxe. Derzeitige Empfehlungen zur VTE-Prophylaxe basieren nur auf Konsensus-Statements und Expertenmeinungen. Es werden die vor kurzem publizierte AWMF-Leitlinie 003/001 und die Leitlinie Nr. 37a des Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) diskutiert. Die RCOG-Leitlinie empfiehlt eine antenatale Thromboseprophylaxe bei Frauen mit vorangegangener VTE, Hochrisiko-Thrombophilien oder beim Vorliegen von≥4 Risikofaktoren ab Beginn der Schwangerschaft, bei 3 Risikofaktoren ab der 28. SSW. Nach der Geburt sollte bei mittlerem Risiko NMH über mindestens 10 Tage und bei hohem Risiko über 6 Wochen gegeben werden. Nach elektiver Sectio wird prophylaktisches NMH über 10 Tage nur bei zusätzlichen Risikofaktoren empfohlen, das gleiche Vorgehen gilt für alle Frauen mit sekundärer Sectio. Die Gabe von NMH sollte bei Beginn der Wehen, vaginalen Blutungen, vor geplanter Geburtseinleitung oder mindestens 12 Stunden vor einer elektiven Sectio abgesetzt werden, sie kann 4–6 Stunden nach vaginaler Geburt und 6–12 Stunden nach Sectio fortgesetzt werden, sofern kein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko besteht. Die aktuellen Leitlinien empfehlen eine Körpergewichts-adaptierte Prophylaxe mit NMH.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of maternal deaths worldwide. Due to the increasing number of pregnant women with risk factors, the incidence of VTE has risen over the past decades. Mortality and morbidity of VTE are potentially preventable, since more than two-thirds of these women have identifiable risk factors and may benefit from appropriate thromboprophylaxis. The cornerstones for prevention of VTE are the individual and careful assessment of preexisting and new-onset/transient risk factors during pregnancy as well as before and after delivery and a risk-stratified pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Current recommendations for thromboprophylaxis must rely on consensus statements and expert opinions. The recently published German AWMF-Guideline 003/001 and the Green-top Guideline No. 37a from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) are discussed. The RCOG Guideline recommends antenatal thromboprophylaxis in women with previous VTE, high-risk thrombophilia or in the presence of ≥ 4 risk factors from the beginning of pregnancy, in women with 3 current risk factors from 28 weeks of gestation. After delivery women with intermediate risk should receive prophylactic LMWH for at least 10 days and women with high risk for 6 weeks postnatally. All women who have had an elective caesarean section and who have>1 additional risk factor should be given prophylactic NMH as well as all women who have had a caesarean section in labour or an emergency caesarean section. At the onset of labour, in case of any vaginal bleeding, prior to scheduled labour induction or at least 12 h before an elective caesarean section, antenatal LMWH prophylaxis should be discontinued. LMWH prophylaxis can be continued 4–6 h after vaginal delivery and 6–12 h after caesarean delivery when women do not have an increased risk of haemorrhage. Current guidelines recommend weight-based LMWH.

Schlüsselwörter

venöse Thromboembolie - aktuelle Leitlinien - Risikostratifizierung - ante- und postnatale Prophylaxe - niedermolekulares Heparin

Key words

venous thromboembolism - current guidelines - risk stratification - antenatal and postnatal prophylaxis - low molecular weight heparin
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH et al. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 697-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kane EV, Calderwood C, Dobbie R et al. A population-based study of venous thrombosis in pregnancy in Scotland 1980-2005. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 169: 223-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Abbasi N, Balayla J, Laporta DP et al. Trends, risk factors and mortality among women with venous thromboembolism during labour and delivery: a population-based study of 8 million births. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 275-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2: e329-e338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehorst P et al. on behalf of MBRRACE-UK Saving Lives ‘Improving Mother’s’ Care. Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009-2012 Oxford National Published Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford. 2014 ISBN 978-0-9931 267-1-0
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 AG “Mütterliche Sterbefälle” AQUA, Göttingen 2015 www.aqua-institut.de
    PubMed
  • 7 Mc Lintock C. Thromboembolism in pregnancy: Challenges and controversies in the prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism and management of anticoagulation in women with mechanical prosthetic heart values. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 29: 519-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 James AH. Pregnancy and thrombotic risk. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 557-563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr. 2014 16/1 Geburtshilfe vom 23.6.2015 www.aqua-institut.de
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Boorjeily G, Paidas M, Khalil H et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Lancet 2010; 375: 500-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sultan AA, West J, Tata LJ et al. Risk of first venous thromboembolism in and around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study. Br J Haematol 2011; 156: 366-373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sultan AA, Tata LJ, West J et al. Risk factors for first venous thromboembolism around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study from the United Kingdom. Blood 2013; 121: 3953-3961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sultan AA, Tata LJ, Grainge MJ et al. The incidence of first venous thromboembolism in and around pregnancy using linked primary and secondary case data. PLoS One 2013; 8: e7310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marik PE, Plante IA. Venous thromboembolism disease and pregnancy. New Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2025-2033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 37a. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. London: RCOG; April 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Jacobsen AF, Skeldestad FE, Sandset PM. Incidence and risk pattern of venous thromboembolisms in pregnancy and purperium – a register-based case control study. AJOG 2008; 198: 233e1-233e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pomp ER, Unselig AM, Roosendaal FR et al. Pregnancy and postpartum period and prothrombotic defects: risk of venous thrombosis in the MEGA study. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 632-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lewis G. (editor) The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health: Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2003-2005. The Seventh Report of Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007
  • 19 Knight M. on behalf of UKOSS. Antenatal pulmonary embolism: risk factors, management and outcomes. BJOG 2008; 115: 453-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bauersachs RM, Dudenhausen JW, Faridi A et al. Risk stratification and heparin prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in pregnant women. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 1237-1245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: venous thromboembolism. NICE Clinical Guideline 92. London: NICE; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Lindquist PG, Bremme K, Hellgren M. Efficacy of obstetric thromboprophylaxis and long-term risk of recurrence on venous thromboembolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 648-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini H et al. IMPROVE Investigators: Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients. Findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132: 936-945
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Lu Yu-S et al. Underuse of postcesarean thromboembolism prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1197-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rath W, Maul H. Thromboembolie-Prophylaxe in Schwangerschaft und Wochenbett. Frauenarzt 2014; 55: 1068-1080
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bain E, Wilson A, Tooher R et al. Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; CD 001659
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 AWMF-Leitlinie 003/001 (S3): Prophylaxe der venösen Thromboembolie. 2. Komplett überarbeitete Auflage, 15.10.2015 http://leitlinien.net 1-186
    PubMed
  • 28 Bates SM, Greer I, Middledorp S et al. VTE, Thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. 9th (ed.). American College of Chest Physicians: Evidenced-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 Suppl e691S-e735S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kevane B, Donnelly J, Di Alton M et al. Risk factors for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a review. J Perinat Med 2014; 42: 417-425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Guimicheva B, Czuprynska J, Arya R. The prevention of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol 2015; 168: 163-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Chauleur C, Gris JC, Laporte S et al. Use of a Delphi method to facilitate antithrombotic prescription during pregnancy. Thromb Res 2010; 126: 88-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pabinger I, Grafenhofer H, Kyrie PA et al. Temporary increase in the risk for recurrence during pregnancy in women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Blood 2002; 100: 1060-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pabinger I, Grafenhofer H, Kaiider A et al. Risk of pregnancy-associated recurrent venous thromboembolism in women with a history of venous thrombosis. J Throm Haemost 2005; 3: 949-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Brill-Edwards P, Ginsbery JS, Gent M et al. for the Recurrence of Clot in This Pregnancy (ROCIT) Study Group. Safety of withholding antepartum heparin in women with a previous episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1439-1444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 De Stefano V, Martinelli I, Rossi E et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and purperium without antithrombotic prophylaxis. Br J Haematol 2006; 135: 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 White RH, Cheng WI, Zhou H et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism after pregnancy-associated venous unprovoked thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100: 246-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Baglini T. Using the laboratory to predict recurrent venous thrombosis. Int J Lab Hematol 2011; 33: 339-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tosetto A, Jurio A, Manucci M et al. Predicting disease recurrence in patients with a previous unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a proposal prediction score (DASH). J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 1019-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Segal JB, Brotman DJ, Nechocea A et al. Predictive value of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A in adults with venous thromboembolism and in family members of those with a mutation: a systematic review. J Ann Med Assoc 2009; 301: 2472-2485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Coppens M, Reijnders JH, Middledorp S et al. Testing for inherited thrombophilia does not reduce recurrence of venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1474-1477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Palareti G, Legnani C, Cosmi B et al. Predictive value of D-Dimer test for recurrent venous thromboembolism after anticoagulant withdrawal in subjects with a previous idiopathic event and in carriers of congenital thrombophilia. Circulation 2003; 108: 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Liu S, Rouleau J, Joseph KS et al. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Epidemiology of pregnancy – associated venous thromboembolism. A population-based study in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 611-620
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bramham K, Retter A, Robinson SE et al. How I treat heterozygous hereditary antithrombin deficiency in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 550-559
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rogenhofer N, Bohlmann MK, Beuter-Winkler P et al. Prevention, management and extent of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with hereditary antithrombin deficiency. Ann Hematol 2014; 93: 385-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Jacobsen AF, Dahm A, Bergrem A et al. Risk of venous thrombosis in pregnancy among carriers of the factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene G202110A polymorphisms. Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2443-2449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 138. Inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 706-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bezemer ID, van der Meer FIM, Eikenboom JCJ et al. The value of family history as a risk indication for venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 610-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sorensen HT, Rüs AH, Diaz IJ et al. Familiar risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 320-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Barco S, Nijkeuter M, Middledorp S. Pregnancy and venous thromboembolism. Semin Throm Hemost 2013; 39: 549-558
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N et al. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1307-1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Tepper NK, Boulet JL, Whiteman MK et al. Postpartum venous thromboembolism-incidence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 987-996
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Sultan AA, Grainge MJ, West J et al. Impact of risk factors on the timing of first postpartum venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study from England. Blood 2014; 124: 2872-2880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Morris JM, Algert CS, Roberts CL. Incidence and risk factors for pulmonary embolism in the postpartum period. Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 998-1003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lussana F, Dentali F, Abbate R et al. Screening for thrombophilia and antithrombotic prophylaxis in pregnancy: Guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET). Thromb Res 2009; 124: e19-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Mc Lintock C, Brighton T, Chunilas S et al. Recommendation for the prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism. Austr NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52: 3-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 James AH, Jamison MG, Brancazio LR et al. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality. AJOG 2006; 194: 1311-1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Nelson SM. Prophylaxis of VTE in women during assisted reproductive techniques. Thromb Res 2009; 123 (Suppl. 03) S8-S15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Chan WS. The “ART” of thrombosis: a review of arterial and venous thrombosis in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21: 207-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Grandone E, Villani M. Assisted reproductive technologies and thrombosis. Thromb Res 2015; 135 (Suppl. 01) S44-S45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Henrikssen P, Westerland E, Wallen H et al. Incidence of pulmonary and venous thromboembolism in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: cross sentinel study. BMJ 2013; 346: e8632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Mo YS, Schenker JG. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and thrombotic events. Am J Reprod Immunol 2014; 72: 541-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Rodger M, Hague WM, Kingdom J et al. Antepartum dalteparin versus no antepartum dalteparin for the prevention of pregnancy complications in pregnant women with thrombophilia (TIPPS): a multicentriel open-label randomized trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 1673-1683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Maybury HJ, Waugh JJ, Gornall HA et al. There is a return to non-pregnant coagulation parameters after four not six weeks postpartum following spontaneous vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 114: 192-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Saha P, Stolz D, Atalla RK. Haemostatic changes in the puerperium, 6 weeks post partum’ (HIP Study) – implications for maternal thromboembolism. BJOG 2009; 116: 1602-1612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Atalla RK, Thompson JR, Oppenheimer CA et al. Reactive thrombocytosis after caesarean section and vaginal delivery: implications for maternal thromboembolism and its prevention. BJOG 2000; 107: 411-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Scharf RE, Pestka MA. Medikamentöse Thromboembolie-Prophylaxe in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Hämostaseologie 2014; 34: 277-288
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Middledorp S. Thrombosis in women: what are the knowledge gaps in 2013?. Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (Suppl. 01) 180-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Waurik K, Riess H, van Aken H et al. S1-Leitlinie: Rückenmarksnahe Regionalanästhesie und Thromboembolieprophylaxe/antithrombotische Medikation. Anästh Intensivmed 2014; 55: 464-492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C. Low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood 2005; 106: 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Goto M, Yoshizato T, Tatsumura M et al. Safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis using exoxeparin sodium after cesarean section: a multi-center study in Japan. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 54: 248-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Clark NP, Delate T, Witt DM et al. A descriptive evaluation of unfractionated heparin use during pregnancy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2009; 27: 267-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Watson H, Davidson S, Keeling D. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: second edition. Br J Haematol 2012; 159: 528-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Dahlmann TC. Osteoporotic fractures and the recurrence of thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium in 184 women undergoing thromboprophylaxis with heparin. AJOG 1993; 68: 1265-1270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Sanson BJ, Lensing AW, Prins MH et al. Safety of low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost 1999; 81: 668-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Ismail SK, Norris L, O’Shea S et al. Weight-adjusted LMWH prophylaxis provides more effective thrombin inhibition in morbidly obese pregnant women. Thromb Res 2014; 134: 234-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Overcash RT, Somers AT, La Coursiere DY. Enoxaparin dosis after cesarean delivery in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1371-1376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar