Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2016; 48(02): 97-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109694
Originalarbeit

Erfolg und Präzision in der Lingualtechnik – Der erste Ein-/Abdruck zählt

Success and Precision in Lingual Orthodontics – The First Impression Counts
A. Foltin
1   Fachbereich Kieferorthopädie, Bernhard-Gottlieb-Universitätszahnklinik Wien, Österreich
,
D. Wiechmann
2   Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
3   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis Bad Essen, Deutschland
,
H-P. Bantleon
1   Fachbereich Kieferorthopädie, Bernhard-Gottlieb-Universitätszahnklinik Wien, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Vollständig individualisierte linguale Apparaturen gewährleisten voraussagbare und präzise Behandlungsergebnisse für jegliche Art von Malokklusion. Voraussetzung für den Behandlungserfolg sind 3 essentielle Punkte: die fehlerfreie Präzisionsabformung, die strikte Einhaltung des Klebeprotokolls unter Anwendung des richtigen Equipments und die genaue Befolgung des empfohlenen Behandlungsprotokolls. Von Anfang an erfordert dies ein hohes Maß an Präzision auch seitens des Behandlers.

Abstract

Completely customized lingual appliances ensure predictable and precise treatment results for all types of malocclusion. Prerequisite for successful treatment are 3 essential points: accurate PVS-impressions, strict adherence to the bonding-protocol using the proper equipment and the attentive abidance with the recommended treatment protocol. A high level of precision is required from the practitioner right from the beginning.

Schlüsselwörter

indirekte Beklebung - Lingualtechnik - vollständig individualisierte linguale Apparatur - WIN-Apparatur - Klebeprotokoll

Key words

indirect bonding - lingual orthodontics - completely customized lingual appliance - WIN appliance - bonding protocol


Publication History

Article published online:
20 July 2016

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Knösel M, Klang E, Helms HJ. et al. Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances. Eur J Orthod DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv069. 2015; [Epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wiechmann D, Klang E, Helms HJ. et al. Lingual appliances reduce the incidence of white spot lesions during orthodontic multibracket treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 414-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beyling F, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Lingual orthodontics for children and adolescents: improvement of the indirect bonding protocol. Head Face Med 2013; 9: 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 van der Veen MH, Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R. et al. Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference?. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 298-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Thalheim A, Schwestka-Polly R. Klinische Umsetzbarkeit eines Setups in der lingualen Orthodontie. Clinical Realisation of a Setup in Lingual Orthodontics. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2008; 40: 277-282
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pauls AH. Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 2010; 71: 348-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Grauer & Proffit Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 433-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deguchi T, Terao F, Aonuma T. et al. Assessment of lingual and labial appliances compared with cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, and objective grading system in Angle Class II extraction cases. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 400-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hohoff A, Stamm T, Ehmer U. Comparison of the effect on oral discomfort of two positioning techniques with lingual brackets. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 226-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slater RD. Speech and discomfort during lingual orthodontic treatment. J Orthod 2013; 40 (Suppl. 01) S34-S37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Pancherz H. et al. Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance – a pilot study. Head Face Med 2010; 6: 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lossdörfer S, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Control of lower incisor inclination with a completely customized lingual appliance for dentoalveolar compensation of class III malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 2013; 74: 381-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lossdörfer S, Bieber C, Schwestka-Polly R. et al. Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation. Head Face Med 2014; 10: 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Demling A, Dittmer MP, Schwestka-Polly R. Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems. Head Face Med 2009; 5: 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Haufe S, Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R. Torquekapazität unterdimensionierter und slotfüllender Bögen bei einer vollständig individuellen lingualen Apparatur. Torque Capacity of Undersized and Slot-Filling Archwires and Completely Customized Lingual Appliances Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2015; 47: 175-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wiechmann D. Anwendungsbereiche der Lingualtechnik und Integration in die kieferorthopädische Praxis. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2015; 47: 200-201
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Foltin A, Wiechmann D, Bantleon H-P. 10 Punkte zur Optimierung des Patientenkomforts im Rahmen einer Lingualbehandlung. 10 Points to Increase Patient Comfort During Lingual Orthodontic Treatment. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2016; 48: 11-15
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar