Dual Energy CT – a Novel Technique for Diagnostic Testing of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis

Abstract

Background The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis is increasing. Established methods to diagnose this condition include X-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dual energy CT (DECT) is a modern technology for the imaging of bone oedema/bruises and has been used in injuries of the extremities and spine. It is unclear whether this technique can also be used in fragility fractures of the pelvis. The aim of this study was to perform a literature research and survey of the “AG Becken III” members of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) on the usefulness of DECT in fractures of the pelvis.

Material and Methods A PubMed-based literature search on DECT comprised the key words “Dual Energy CT”, “Pelvis/Pelvic”, “Insufficiency” and “Fractures” and their combinations. Thirty-two publications were reviewed completely (full text). Finally, 15 articles were chosen and included in the current study. The survey of the members of the “AG Becken III” was based on a questionnaire and aimed to determine the popularity and potential benefits of DECT in comparison to established diagnostic options.

Results No studies on the use of DECT in fragility fractures of the pelvis were identified; the few articles found referred to fractures of the extremities and spine. The response rate to the questionnaire was 25/83 (30.1 %). The participants had a mean personal experience of 8.4 years/151.6 interventions in pelvic surgery. Although some respondents had heard of DECT, this technique – if available – was only used in other indications. However, the potential benefit of DECT was recognised, especially in the acute diagnostic testing of fragility fractures. There is limited consensus on the optimal diagnostic test (CT vs. MRI) of pelvic fractures.

Conclusion Although DECT is already established for other indications and is regarded as a promising method by all respondents of the “AG Becken III”, DECT is not yet routinely used for diagnostic testing of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Potential advantages of DECT include its greater sensitivity than CT in detecting bone oedema with equal radiation exposure. Unlike MRI, it is available 24 hours/7 days.

Key words

dual energy CT - fragility fracture - pelvis

• References/Literatur

• 1 Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Pressemiteilung: Lebenserwartung für Jungen 78 Jahre, für Mädchen 83 Jahre Nr. 072. 04.03.2016 Im Internet: https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2016/03/PD16_072_12621.html Stand: 23.06.2016
• 2 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, AG Becken III. Auswertung aus dem Beckenregister der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. 26.02.2016 Im Internet: http://www.dgu-online.de/ueber-uns/arbeitsplattformen/arbeitsgemeinschaften/ag-becken-iii.html Stand: 25.05.2016
• 3 Stuby F, Schäffler A, Haas T. et al. Insuffizienzfrakturen des Beckenrings. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 351-364
• 4 Imhof H, Halpern B, Herneth A, Friedrich K, Metzner M, Müller-Mang C, Nöbauer-Huhmann J, Prayer D, Sommer O, Wolf F. Pareto-Reihe Radiologie Wirbelsäule. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006
• 5 Bohndorf K, Imhof H, Wörtler K. Radiologische Diagnostik der Knochen und Gelenke. 3. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2014
• 6 Omoumi P, Becce F, Racine D. et al. Dual-energy CT: basic principles, technical approaches, and applications in musculoskeletal imaging (part 1). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19: 431-437
• 7 Coursey C, Nelson R, Boll D. et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging?. Radiographics 2010; 30: 1037-1055
• 8 Faby S, Kuchenbecker S, Sawall S. et al. Performance of todayʼs dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: a simulation study. Med Phys 2015; 42: 4349-4366
• 9 Wang C, Tsai J, Chuang M. et al. Bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures: detection with dual-energy CT. Radiology 2013; 269: 525-533
• 10 Bierry G, Venkatasamy A, Kremer S. et al. Dual-energy CT in vertebral compression fractures: performance of visual and quantitative analysis for bone marrow edema demonstration with comparison to MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43: 485-492
• 11 Ai S, Qu M, Glazebrook KN. et al. Use of dual-energy CT and virtual non-calcium techniques to evaluate post-traumatic bone bruises in knees in the subacute setting. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43: 1289-1295
• 12 Pache G, Krauss B, Strohm P. et al. Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions–feasibility study. Radiology 2010; 256: 617-624
• 13 Reddy T, McLaughlin PD, Mallinson PI. et al. Detection of occult, undisplaced hip fractures with a dual-energy CT algorithm targeted to detection of bone marrow edema. Emerg Radiol 2015; 22: 25-29
• 14 Karaca L, Yuceler Z, Kantarci M. et al. The feasibility of dual-energy CT in differentiation of vertebral compression fractures. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20150300
• 15 Kaup M, Wichmann J, Scholtz J. et al. Dual-energy CT-based display of bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: impact on diagnostic accuracy of radiologists with varying levels of experience in correlation to MR imaging. Radiology 2016; 280: 510-519