PDF herunterladen
Zentralbl Chir 2016; 141(S 01): S26-S34
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112026
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Emphysemchirurgie – State of the Art 2016

Lung Volume Reduction Surgery – State of the Art 2016
C. Caviezel
1   Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Schweiz
,
D. Franzen
2   Klinik für Pneumologie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Schweiz
,
I. Inci
1   Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Schweiz
,
W. Weder
1   Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Schweiz
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. September 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Bereits Mitte der 90er-Jahre konnte in großen Fallserien gezeigt werden, dass die chirurgische Lungenvolumenreduktion (LVRS) bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Lungenemphysem die Atemnot verringert und die Lungenfunktion und Lebensqualität verbessert. Mit dem National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) Anfang der 2000er-Jahre wurde dies in einer großen randomisierten Studie bestätigt und zudem gezeigt, dass gewisse Patienten dadurch auch länger leben. Die adäquate Patientenselektion ist wohl die essenziellste Voraussetzung für eine erfolgreiche LVRS und gehört in die Hände eines erfahrenen Zentrums mit multidisziplinärer Emphysemkonferenz. Während das apikal betonte, heterogene Emphysem als beste Indikation gilt, gibt es ein ganzes Spektrum an Emphysemmorphologien, welche sich bei richtiger Auswahl ebenfalls für die Chirurgie eignen. Daneben existieren heutzutage mit den verschiedenen bronchoskopischen Verfahren an Evidenz und Qualität wachsende Methoden, welche die multidisziplinäre Behandlungspalette erweitern.

Abstract

In a number of large case series in the mid-1990s, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) was shown to reduce dyspnoea and improve pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema. The large randomised National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) confirmed this in the early 2000s and also demonstrated that selected patients live longer after surgery. Patient selection is crucial to the success of the procedure and should be performed at a specialised experienced centre with a multidisciplinary team approach on emphysema treatment. The upper-lobe predominant heterogeneous type of emphysema is the best indication, but there are other types of emphysema morphology that are also eligible for surgery, if ideally chosen. Nowadays there is also growing evidence for positive effects after different types of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with increasing quality. These methods add to the range of multimodal emphysema treatment.

Schlüsselwörter

Lungenvolumenreduktion - LVRS - Emphysem - COPD

Key words

lung volume reduction - LVRS - emphysema - COPD
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Reich L. Der Einfluss des Pneumoperitoneums auf das Lungenemphysem. Wien Arch f inn Med 1924; 8: 245-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Piaggio-Blanco RA, Piaggio-Blanco RO, Caimi RA. Mejorías sintomáticas del enfisema por el neumoperotoneo. Arch urug de med, cir y especialid 1937; 10: 273-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Carter MG, Gaensler EA, Kyllonen A. Pneumoperitoneum in the treatment of pulmonary emphysema. N Engl J Med 1950; 243: 549-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brantigan OC, Mueller E. Surgical treatment of pulmonary emphysema. Am Surg 1957; 23: 789-804
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bingisser R, Zollinger A, Hauser M et al. Bilateral volume reduction surgery for diffuse pulmonary emphysema by video-assisted thoracoscopy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 875-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cooper JD, Trulock EP, Triantafillou AN et al. Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 106-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cooper JD, Patterson GA, Sundaresan RS et al. Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 1319-1329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Russi EW, Stammberger U, Weder W. Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 208-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Criner GJ, Cordova FC, Furukawa S et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery to pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 2018-2027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pompeo E, Marino M, Nofroni I et al. Reduction pneumoplasty versus respiratory rehabilitation in severe emphysema: a randomized study. Pulmonary Emphysema Research Group. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 948-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2059-2073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Patients at high risk of death after lung-volume-reduction surgery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1075-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McNulty W, Jordan S, Hopkinson NS. Attitudes and access to lung volume reduction surgery for COPD: a survey by the British Thoracic Society. BMJ Open Respir Res 2014; 1: e000023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Berger RL, Decamp MM, Criner GJ et al. Lung volume reduction therapies for advanced emphysema: an update. Chest 2010; 138: 407-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rathinam S, Oey I, Steiner M et al. The role of the emphysema multidisciplinary team in a successful lung volume reduction surgery programme. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46: 1021-1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Weder W, Tutic M, Bloch KE. Lung volume reduction surgery in nonheterogeneous emphysema. Thorac Surg Clin 2009; 19: 193-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Weder W, Thurnheer R, Stammberger U et al. Radiologic emphysema morphology is associated with outcome after surgical lung volume reduction. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 313-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Russi EW, Bloch KE, Weder W. Functional and morphological heterogeneity of emphysema and its implication for selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery. Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 230-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stolk J, Versteegh MI, Montenij LJ et al. Densitometry for assessment of effect of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 1138-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Thurnheer R, Engel H, Weder W et al. Role of lung perfusion scintigraphy in relation to chest computed tomography and pulmonary function in the evaluation of candidates for lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 301-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chandra D, Lipson DA, Hoffman EA et al. Perfusion scintigraphy and patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 937-946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Marchetti N, Criner GJ. Surgical approaches to treating emphysema: lung volume reduction surgery, bullectomy, and lung transplantation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 36: 592-608
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ciccone AM, Meyers BF, Guthrie TJ et al. Long-term outcome of bilateral lung volume reduction in 250 consecutive patients with emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 513-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bloch KE, Weder W, Boehler A et al. Successful lung volume reduction surgery in a child with severe airflow obstruction and hyperinflation due to constrictive bronchiolitis. Chest 2002; 122: 747-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kim V, Criner GJ, Abdallah HY et al. Small airway morphometry and improvement in pulmonary function after lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fessler HE, Permutt S. Lung volume reduction surgery and airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 715-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Criner GJ, Cordova F, Sternberg AL et al. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) Part II: Lessons learned about lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 881-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Stoller JK, Gildea TR, Ries AL et al. Lung volume reduction surgery in patients with emphysema and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 241-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cassina PC, Teschler H, Konietzko N et al. Two-year results after lung volume reduction surgery in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency versus smokerʼs emphysema. Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 1028-1032
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Tutic M, Bloch KE, Lardinois D et al. Long-term results after lung volume reduction surgery in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 408-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McKenna jr. RJ, Benditt JO, DeCamp M et al. Safety and efficacy of median sternotomy versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung volume reduction surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 1350-1360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pompeo E, Mineo TC. Pulmonary Emphysema Research Group. Long-term outcome of staged versus one-stage bilateral thoracoscopic reduction pneumoplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 627-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Oey IF, Morgan MD, Spyt TJ et al. Staged bilateral lung volume reduction surgery – the benefits of a patient-led strategy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37: 846-852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Alifano M, Jayle C, Bertin F et al. Medical and economic evaluation of foreseal bioabsorbable reinforcement sleeves compared with current standard of care for reducing air leakage duration after lung resection for malignancy: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2016; DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001687. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Stammberger U, Klepetko W, Stamatis G et al. Buttressing the staple line in lung volume reduction surgery: a randomized three-center study. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1820-1825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Senbaklavaci O, Wisser W, Jandrasits O et al. [Results of lung-volume reduction surgery in end-stage lung emphysema]. Chirurg 1999; 70: 909-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Brenner M, McKenna jr RJ, Chen JC et al. Relationship between amount of lung resected and outcome after lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 388-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Curtis JL et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes after bilateral lung volume reduction surgery: prediction by quantitative CT. Chest 2001; 119: 1337-1346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tutic M, Lardinois D, Imfeld S et al. Lung-volume reduction surgery as an alternative or bridging procedure to lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 208-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 McKenna jr. RJ, Fischel RJ, Brenner M et al. Use of the Heimlich valve to shorten hospital stay after lung reduction surgery for emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1115-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Meyers BF, Yusen RD, Guthrie TJ et al. Results of lung volume reduction surgery in patients meeting a national emphysema treatment trial high-risk criterion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 829-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Naunheim KS, Wood DE, Krasna MJ et al. Predictors of operative mortality and cardiopulmonary morbidity in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 43-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Weder W, Tutic M, Lardinois D et al. Persistent benefit from lung volume reduction surgery in patients with homogeneous emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bloch KE, Georgescu CL, Russi EW et al. Gain and subsequent loss of lung function after lung volume reduction surgery in cases of severe emphysema with different morphologic patterns. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 845-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Shah PL, Zoumot Z, Singh S et al. Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Davey C, Zoumot Z, Jordan S et al. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves for patients with heterogeneous emphysema and intact interlobar fissures (the BeLieVeR-HIFi study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 1066-1073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Deslée G, Mal H, Dutau H et al. Lung volume reduction coil treatment vs. usual care in patients with severe emphysema: the REVOLENS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 175-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Herth FJ, Valipour A, Shah PL et al. Segmental volume reduction using thermal vapour ablation in patients with severe emphysema: 6-month results of the multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled STEP-UP trial. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 185-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Herth FJ, Noppen M, Valipour A et al. Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in a European cohort. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 1334-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Slebos DJ, Hartman JE, Klooster K et al. Bronchoscopic coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis. Respiration 2015; 90: 136-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Herth FJ, Slebos DJ, Rabe KF et al. Endoscopic lung volume reduction: an expert panel recommendation. Respiration 2016; 91: 241-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hartman JE, Klooster K, Gortzak K et al. Long-term follow-up after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with coils in patients with severe emphysema. Respirology 2015; 20: 319-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Koegelenberg CF, Slebos DJ, Shah PL et al. Time for the global rollout of endoscopic lung volume reduction. Respiration 2015; 90: 430-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Klooster K, ten Hacken NH, Hartman JE et al. Endobronchial valves for emphysema without interlobar collateral ventilation. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2325-2335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Backhus L, Sargent J, Cheng A et al. Outcomes in lung transplantation after previous lung volume reduction surgery in a contemporary cohort. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 1678-1683.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Kostron A, Horn-Tutic M, Franzen D et al. Repeated lung volume reduction surgery is successful in selected patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48: 710-715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Senbaklavaci O, Wisser W, Ozpeker C et al. Successful lung volume reduction surgery brings patients into better condition for later lung transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 363-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Nathan SD, Edwards LB, Barnett SD et al. Outcomes of COPD lung transplant recipients after lung volume reduction surgery. Chest 2004; 126: 1569-1574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Burns KE, Keenan RJ, Grgurich WF et al. Outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery followed by lung transplantation: a matched cohort study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1587-1593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar