Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112573
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses
Publication History
submitted: 19 January 2016
accepted after revision: 06 June 2016
Publication Date:
30 August 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/201610/lookinside/thumbnails/13780_10-1055-s-0042-112573-1.jpg)
Background and study aims: The differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is currently suboptimal in centers that are not equipped with rapid on-site evaluation. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) enables real-time in vivo microscopic imaging during endoscopy. This study aimed to describe nCLE interpretation criteria for the characterization of pancreatic masses, with histopathological correlation, and to perform the first validation of these criteria.
Patients and methods: A total of 40 patients were evaluated by EUS-FNA combined with nCLE for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses. Final diagnosis was based on EUS-FNA histology and follow-up at 1 year. Five unblinded examiners defined nCLE criteria for adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET) using a set of video sequences from 14 patients with confirmed pathology (Step 1). These criteria were retrospectively validated by four independent, blinded examiners using sequences from 32 patients (Step 2).
Results: nCLE criteria were described for adenocarcinoma (dark cell aggregates, irregular vessels with leakages of fluorescein), chronic pancreatitis (residual regular glandular pancreatic structures), and NET (black cell aggregates surrounded by vessels and fibrotic areas). These criteria correlated with the histological features of the corresponding lesions. In the validation review, a conclusive nCLE result was obtained in 75 % of cases (96 % correct). Statistical evaluation provided promising results, with high specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for all types of pancreatic masses.
Conclusion: Considering the low negative predictive value of EUS-FNA, nCLE could help to rule out malignancy after a previous inconclusive EUS-FNA. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings and to establish the role of nCLE in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01563133).
-
References
- 1 Nelsen EM, Buelher D, Soni AV et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms-solid and cystic: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 318-327
- 2 Iglesias-García J, Lariño-Noia J, Lindkvist B et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2015; 107: 221-228
- 3 Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJW, Possamai L et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 319-331
- 4 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lindkvist B, Lariño-Noia J et al. The role of EUS in relation to other imaging modalities in the differential diagnosis between mass forming chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis and ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012; 104: 315-321
- 5 Hartwig W, Schneider L, Diener MK et al. Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 5-20
- 6 Teubner D, Kiesslich R, Matsumoto T et al. Beyond standard image-enhanced endoscopy confocal endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24: 427-434
- 7 Gupta A, Attar BM, Koduru P et al. Utility of confocal laser endomicroscopy in identifying high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 369-377
- 8 Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB et al. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1049-1060
- 9 Slivka A, Gan I, Jamidar P et al. Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures: results of a prospective multicenter international study. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 282-290
- 10 Konda VJ, Meining A, Jamil L et al. In vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 1006-1013
- 11 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B et al. A novel approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 26-32
- 12 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B et al. In vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2603-2612
- 13 Giovannini M, Caillol F, Poizat F et al. Feasibility of intratumoral confocal microscopy under endoscopic ultrasound guidance. Endosc Ultrasound 2012; 1: 80-83
- 14 Kongkam P, Pittayanon R, Sampatanukul P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (ENES): a pilot study. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E17-E23
- 15 Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P et al. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1260-1266
- 16 Gincul R, Palazzo M, Pujol B et al. Contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 373-379
- 17 Petrone MC, Arcidiacono PG. Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes?. Endosc Ultrasound 2014; 3: 22-27