RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113186
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreaticogastrostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent plus a double-pigtail plastic stent
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
10. August 2016 (online)
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic duct drainage remains one of the most technically challenging endosonography interventions. There is a lack of specific devices for the technique, and the question of which kind of stent should be used remains controversial: plastic (straight, single or double pigtail) or self-expanding metal [1] [2] [3] [4].
The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been used in different scenarios (transmural drainage of collections and EUS-guided anastomosis). There are various sizes of LAMS available, and some of them, specifically designed to be used in the bile duct, are small (e. g. 6 × 8 mm) [5].
To our knowledge, this is the first report to date of successful EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a LAMS plus a pigtail stent. A 44-year-old man, with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic duct stricture causing abdominal pain, was referred to our unit. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was attempted, but cannulation was unsuccessful. After a failed rendezvous, EUS-guided transluminal pancreatic duct drainage (pancreaticogastrostomy) was successfully performed using a biliary LAMS (6 × 8 mm, HotAXIOS; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) plus a double-pigtail stent, with the purpose of avoiding self-occlusion, food impaction, dislodgement, and migration ([Video 1]).
Qualität:
First, the dilated pancreatic duct (up to 5.6 mm) was punctured directly from the gastric wall, using a 19 G needle, and tract dilation was carried out using a 6 Fr cystotome over a 0.035-inch guidewire ([Fig. 1]). Second, a LAMS was inserted and deployed using the HotAXIOS system. All four steps of the delivery system were performed under EUS, endoscopic, and fluoroscopic guidance ([Fig. 2]). Finally, a double-pigtail plastic stent (7 Fr × 5 cm, Advanix; Boston Scientific) was advanced through the LAMS under endoscopic vision ([Fig. 3]). The total procedure duration was 48 minutes. The patient’s condition evolved satisfactorily without any adverse events.
The use of a LAMS plus a double-pigtail stent in EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage was technically feasible and safe, and reduced the potential risk of pancreatic fluid leak or stent migration. For these reasons, it should be considered as a new option in this scenario.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD
-
References
- 1 Chen YI, Saxena P, Ngamruengphong S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: technical approaches to a challenging procedure. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 192-193
- 2 Chapman CG, Waxman I, Siddiqui UD. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic duct drainage: the basics of when and how to perform EUS-guided pancreatic duct interventions. Clin Endosc 2016; 49: 161-167
- 3 Fujii-Lau LL, Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015; 22: 51-57
- 4 Will U, Reichel A, Fueldner F et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage for patients with symptomatic obstruction and enlargement of the pancreatic duct. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 13140-13151
- 5 Gornals JB, Consiglieri C, Gallarreta V et al. Single-session fluoroless endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and choledochoduodenostomy with a biliary lumen-apposing stent. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 418-419