PDF herunterladen
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71(04): 317-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742362
Original Thoracic

Bleeding during Learning Curve of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: CUSUM Analysis Results

Alfonso Fiorelli 
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Roberto Cascone
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Annalisa Carlucci
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Giovanni Natale
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Antonio Noro
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Mary Bove
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
,
Mario Santini 
1   Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Background The management of intraoperative bleeding during thoracoscopic lobectomy is challenging, especially for non-experienced surgeons. We evaluated intraoperative bleeding in relation to learning curve of thoracoscopic lobectomy, the strategies to face it, the outcomes, and the target case number for gaining the technical proficiency.

Methods This was a retrospective single center study including consecutive patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Based on cumulative sum analysis, patients were divided into early and late experience groups, and the differences on surgical outcomes, with particular focus on vascular injury, were statistically compared.

Results Eight-three patients were evaluated. Cumulative sum charts showed a decreasing of operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay after the 49th, the 43th, and the 39th case, respectively. Early (n = 49) compared with late experience group (n = 34) was associated with higher conversion rate (p = 0.08), longer operative time (p <0.0001), greater blood loss (p <0.0001), higher transfusion rate (p = 0.01), higher postoperative air leak rate (p = 0.02), longer chest tube stay (p <0.0001), and hospitalization (p <0.0001). Six patients (7%) had intraoperative bleeding during early phase of learning curve, successfully treated by thoracoscopy in four cases. Patients with vascular injury (n = 6) compared with control group (n = 77) presented a longer operative time (p = 0.003), greater blood loss (p = 0.0001), and higher transfusion rate (p = 0.001); no significant differences were found regarding postoperative morbidity (p = 0.57), length of chest tube stay (p = 0.07), and hospitalization (p = 0.07).

Conclusion Technical proficiency was achieved after 50 procedures. All vascular injuries occurred in the early phase of learning curve; they were safely managed, without affecting surgical outcomes.

Keywords

surgery - complications - thoracoscopy - VATS - pulmonary artery - left upper lobectomy


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 09. März 2021

Angenommen: 24. November 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Februar 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2 (03) 244-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hennon MW, Demmy TL. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for locally advanced lung cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 1 (01) 37-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Caronia FP, Fiorelli A, Ruffini E, Nicolosi M, Santini M, Lo Monte AI. A comparative analysis of Pancoast tumour resection performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus standard open approaches. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014; 19 (03) 426-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yang CJ, Kumar A, Klapper JA. et al. A National analysis of long-term survival following thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (01) 163-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, Gaissert HA, Harpole DH, Wright CD. Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (02) 247-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ceppa DP, Kosinski AS, Berry MF. et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy has increasing benefit in patients with poor pulmonary function: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (03) 487-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 1 (01) 47-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferguson MK. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin 2008; 18 (03) 235-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Liu L, Mei J, He J. et al; International Interest Group on Bleeding during VATS Lung Surgery. International expert consensus on the management of bleeding during VATS lung surgery. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7 (23) 712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 205-213
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Gonzalez-Rivas D, Stupnik T, Fernandez R. et al. Intraoperative bleeding control by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49 (Suppl. 01) i17-i24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Yoshikawa R, Ohsawa F, Yazawa T, Matsuura N. Algorithm-based troubleshooting to manage bleeding during thoracoscopic anatomic pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11 (11) 4544-4550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Miyazaki T, Yamasaki N, Tsuchiya T. et al. Management of unexpected intraoperative bleeding during thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a single institutional experience. Surg Today 2016; 46 (08) 901-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wu CF, de la Mercedes T, Fernandez R. et al. Management of intra-operative major bleeding during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic resection: two-center experience. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (06) 1880-1889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Moroga T. et al. Totally thoracoscopic surgery and troubleshooting for bleeding in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (03) 994-999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Andersson SE, Ilonen IK, Pälli OH, Salo JA, Räsänen JV. Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27: 100362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stamenovic D, Messerschmidt A, Schneider T. Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29 (07) 914-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gezer S, Avcı A, Türktan M. Cusum analysis for learning curve of videothoracoscopic lobectomy. Open Med (Wars) 2016; 11 (01) 574-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Li X, Wang J, Ferguson MK. Competence versus mastery: the time course for developing proficiency in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (04) 1150-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Puri V, Gaissert HA, Wormuth DW. et al. Defining proficiency for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons participants performing thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (01) 202-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, Hang F, Cao S, Cao Y. Video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy for lung cancer: description of a learning curve. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017; 27 (07) 696-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lim TO, Soraya A, Ding LM, Morad Z. Assessing doctors' competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors' performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14 (03) 251-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Zhao H, Bu L, Yang F, Li J, Li Y, Wang J. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve. World J Surg 2010; 34 (10) 2368-2372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gonfiotti A, Bongiolatti S, Borgianni S. et al. Development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy program in a single institution: results before and after completion of the learning curve. J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 11 (01) 130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yan TD, Cao C, D'Amico TA. et al; International VATS Lobectomy Consensus Group. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 45 (04) 633-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McKenna Jr RJJR. Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2008; 18 (03) 275-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Schieman C, Seder CW, D'Amico TA, Grondin SC. General thoracic surgical training in North America: contrasting general thoracic surgery residencies in Canada and the United States. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156 (06) 2379-2387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mazzella A, Olland A, Falcoz PE, Renaud S, Santelmo N, Massard G. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: which is the learning curve of an experienced consultant?. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8 (09) 2444-2453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Divisi D, Bertolaccini L, Barone M. et al; Italian VATS Group. National adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Italian VATS register evaluation. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10 (01) 330-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cerfolio RJ, Bess KM, Wei B, Minnich DJ. Incidence, results, and our current intraoperative technique to control major vascular injuries during minimally invasive robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102 (02) 394-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar