CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2022; 31(01): 067-073
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742508
Special Section: Inclusive Digital Health
Working Group Contributions

Open Source Digital Health Software for Resilient, Accessible and Equitable Healthcare Systems

Contribution from the IMIA Open Source Working Group
Chris Paton
1   University of Oxford, United Kingdom
2   University of Otago, New Zealand
,
Jørn Braa
3   University of Oslo, Norway
,
Andrew Muhire
4   Ministry of Health, Rwanda
,
Luis Marco-Ruiz
5   Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Norway
,
Shinji Kobayashi
6   National Institute of Public Health, Japan
,
Hamish Fraser
7   Brown University, USA
,
Luis Falcón
8   GNU Solidario, Spain
,
Alvin Marcelo
9   University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines
› Author Affiliations

Summary

Objective: To assess the impact of open-source projects on making healthcare systems more resilient, accessible and equitable.

Methods: In response to the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) call for working group contributions for the IMIA Yearbook, the Open Source Working Group (OSWG) conducted a rapid review of current open source digital health projects to illustrate how they can contribute to making healthcare systems more resilient, accessible and equitable. We sought case studies from the OSWG membership to illustrate these three concepts and how open source software (OSS) addresses these concepts in the real world. These case studies are discussed against the background of literature identified through the rapid review.

Results: To illustrate the concept of resilience, we present case studies from the adoption of District Health Information Software version 2 (DHIS2) for managing the Covid pandemic in Rwanda, and the adoption of the OpenEHR open Health IT standard. To illustrate accessibility, we show how open source design systems for user interface design have been used by governments to ensure accessibility of digital health services for patients and healthy individuals, and by the OpenMRS community to standardise their user interface design. Finally, to illustrate the concept of equity, we describe the OpenWHO framework and two open source digital health projects, GNU Health and openIMIS, that both aim to reduce health inequities through the use of open source digital health software.

Conclusion: This review has demonstrated that open source software addresses many of the challenges involved in making healthcare more accessible, equitable and resilient in high and low income settings.



Publication History

Article published online:
02 June 2022

© 2022. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Haldane V, De Foo C, Abdalla SM, Jung AS, Tan M, Wu S, et al. Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nat Med 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980.
  • 2 Haldane V, Ong SE, Chuah FL, Legido-Quigley H. Health systems resilience: meaningful construct or catchphrase? Lancet 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1513.
  • 3 Thomas S, Sagan A, Larkin J, Cylus J, Figueras J, Karanikolos M. Strengthening health systems resilience: Key concepts and strategies. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2020.
  • 4 Kobayashi S, Falcón L, Fraser H, Braa J, Amarakoon P, Marcelo A, et al. Using Open Source, Open Data, and Civic Technology to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic and Infodemic. Yearb Med Inform 2021 Aug;30(1):38-43.
  • 5 Poppe O, Sæbø JI, Braa J. WHO digital health packages for disseminating data standards and data use practices. Int J Med Inform 2021 May;149:104422.
  • 6 Sebastian Garde, Ocean Health Systems. [No title] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/
  • 7 Ripple-Foundation/EtherCIS [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 7]; [Available from: https://gitter.im/Ripple-Foundation/EtherCIS]
  • 8 EHRbase – data is for life, not just for one system [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://ehrbase.org/
  • 9 Haarbrandt B, Schreiweis B, Rey S, Sax U, Scheithauer S, Rienhoff O, et al. HiGHmed Consortium, Marschollek M. HiGHmed - An Open Platform Approach to Enhance Care and Research across Institutional Boundaries. Methods Inf Med 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e66-e81.
  • 10 HIPAA Journal. Healthcare Data Breach Costs Fall to $380 Per Record [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.hipaajournal.com/healthcare-data-breach-costs-2017-8854/
  • 11 NSA. Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Feb/25/2002588479/-1/-1/0/CSI_EMBRACING_ZT_SECURITY_MODEL_UOO115131-21.PDF
  • 12 Paton C, Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM, English M, Warren J. Improving the Usability and Safety of Digital Health Systems: The Role of Predictive Human-Computer Interaction Modeling. J Med Internet Res 2021 May 27;23(5):e25281.
  • 13 Paton C, Bladonn M. Introduction to Digital Health. In: Textbook of Digital Health. University of Oxford; 2021. p. 7”16.
  • 14 Wolfe BA, Mamlin BW, Biondich PG, Fraser HS, Jazayeri D, Allen C, et al. The OpenMRS system: collaborating toward an open source EMR for developing countries. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006;2006:1146.
  • 15 Verma N, Mamlin B, Flowers J, Acharya S, Labrique A, Cullen T. OpenMRS as a global good: Impact, opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned from fifteen years of implementation. Int J Med Inform 2021 May;149:104405.
  • 16 Muinga N, Magare S, Monda J, Kamau O, Houston S, Fraser H, et al. Implementing an Open Source Electronic Health Record System in Kenyan Health Care Facilities: Case Study. JMIR Med Inform 2018 Apr 18;6(2):e22.
  • 17 Evensen H. Design principles for an online app development course used globally. Experiences from the DHIS2 ecosystem [Internet]. duo.uio.no; 2021. Available from: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/87086/8/finalThesis18.pdf
  • 18 Fessenden T. Design Systems 101 [Internet]. NNGroup.com. 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-systems-101/
  • 19 Cabinet Office. Directgov 2010 and beyond: revolution not evolution, a report by Martha Lane Fox [Internet]. GOV.UK; 2010 [cited 2021 Nov 15]; [Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/directgov-2010-and-beyond-revolution-not-evolution-a-report-by-martha-lane-fox]
  • 20 Central Digital and Data Office. Government Design Principles [Internet]. GOV.UK; 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/government-design-principles
  • 21 NHS. About the NHS website [Internet]. NHS.UK; 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/about-us/about-the-nhs-website/
  • 22 Hendry J. DTA abandons open source govt design system [Internet]. IT News 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.itnews.com.au/news/dta-abandons-open-source-govt-design-system-568669
  • 23 Design System AU. Design System AU [Internet]. Design System AU 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 15] Available from: https://designsystemau.org/
  • 24 Jackson C. Micro Frontends [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://martinfowler.com/articles/micro-frontends.html
  • 25 Carbon Design System [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/opensource/open/projects/carbon-design-system/
  • 26 Hogan J, Fraser HF, Mwangi A. Data Science for Decision Support in the HIV Care Cascade (No. R01-1R01AI167694). Grant award by National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
  • 27 Bacher I, Mankowski P, White C, Flowers J, Fraser HS. (n.d.). A New FHIR-based API for OpenMRS. Presented at the AMIA Clinical Informatics Conference, May 2021.
  • 28 Welcome to OpenWHO [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://openwho.org/
  • 29 Utunen H, George R, Ndiaye N, Tokar A, Attias M, Gamhewage G. Delivering WHO's Life-Saving Information in Real-Time During a Pandemic Through an Online Learning Platform: Evidence from Global Use. Stud Health Technol Inform 2021 May 27;281:969-973.
  • 30 open-source-communication-channel: Communication channel for open source community [Internet]. Github; [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://github.com/WorldHealthOrganization/open-source-communication-channel
  • 31 Fraser HS, Mugisha M, Remera E, Ngenzi J, Richards J, Santas X, et al. User Perceptions and Use of an Enhanced EHR with and without Clinical Alerts, in 54 Health Centers In Rwanda: Cross sectional survey. JMIR Med Inform 2022;(32305).
  • 32 Ojo AI. Validation of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. Healthc Inform Res 2017 Jan;23(1):60-6.
  • 33 Braa J, Sahay S. The DHIS2 Open Source Software Platform: Evolution Over Time and Space. In: Celi LAG, Fraser HSF, Nikore V, Osorio JS, Paik K. Global Health Informatics, Principles of eHealth and mHealth to Improve Quality of Care. MIT Press; 2017.